Letizia Li Piani , Giovanna Esposito , Eva Negri , Irene La Vecchia , Vittoria Sterpi , Claudia Santucci , Rossella Bonzi , Carlo La Vecchia , Edgardo Somigliana , Paola Viganò , Fabio Parazzini
{"title":"新鲜循环中颗粒物(PM2.5, PM10)暴露与辅助生殖技术结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Letizia Li Piani , Giovanna Esposito , Eva Negri , Irene La Vecchia , Vittoria Sterpi , Claudia Santucci , Rossella Bonzi , Carlo La Vecchia , Edgardo Somigliana , Paola Viganò , Fabio Parazzini","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several studies have assessed the relationship between exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and ≤10 μm (PM<sub>10</sub>) and assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates, with controversial findings. This review aimed to consolidate the current evidence from fresh ART cycles and explore sources of heterogeneity across studies. The outcomes of interest were biochemical and clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Four exposure timeframes were considered: T0 (within 90 days before starting the stimulation protocol), T1 (from the first day of stimulation protocol to oocyte retrieval), T2 (from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer), and T3 (from embryo transfer to pregnancy).</div><div>Database searches were conducted on PubMed/Medline and Embase up to April 2025, using a combination of MeSH/Emtree and generic terms relating to ART patients and air pollution exposure. Fourteen studies, involving 333,438 cycles, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were conducted between 2010 and 2024 primarily in China (10/14), while 3 were from the USA and one from Korea. We estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> for biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births, using random-effects meta-analytic models.</div><div>The pooled RRs for 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increment in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> at T0 were respectively 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91–1.04) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.02) for biochemical pregnancy; for clinical pregnancy they were respectively 0.98 (95%CI: 0.96–1.01) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–1.00). All other findings were close to unity. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies for selected outcomes and exposure periods for both pollutants.</div><div>This systematic review found no significant association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> exposure and ART outcomes after fresh embryo transfer for any of the four exposure windows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"361 ","pages":"Article 121518"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in fresh cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Letizia Li Piani , Giovanna Esposito , Eva Negri , Irene La Vecchia , Vittoria Sterpi , Claudia Santucci , Rossella Bonzi , Carlo La Vecchia , Edgardo Somigliana , Paola Viganò , Fabio Parazzini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Several studies have assessed the relationship between exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and ≤10 μm (PM<sub>10</sub>) and assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates, with controversial findings. This review aimed to consolidate the current evidence from fresh ART cycles and explore sources of heterogeneity across studies. The outcomes of interest were biochemical and clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Four exposure timeframes were considered: T0 (within 90 days before starting the stimulation protocol), T1 (from the first day of stimulation protocol to oocyte retrieval), T2 (from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer), and T3 (from embryo transfer to pregnancy).</div><div>Database searches were conducted on PubMed/Medline and Embase up to April 2025, using a combination of MeSH/Emtree and generic terms relating to ART patients and air pollution exposure. Fourteen studies, involving 333,438 cycles, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were conducted between 2010 and 2024 primarily in China (10/14), while 3 were from the USA and one from Korea. We estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> for biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births, using random-effects meta-analytic models.</div><div>The pooled RRs for 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increment in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> at T0 were respectively 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91–1.04) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.02) for biochemical pregnancy; for clinical pregnancy they were respectively 0.98 (95%CI: 0.96–1.01) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–1.00). All other findings were close to unity. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies for selected outcomes and exposure periods for both pollutants.</div><div>This systematic review found no significant association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> exposure and ART outcomes after fresh embryo transfer for any of the four exposure windows.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment\",\"volume\":\"361 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025004935\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231025004935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10) exposure and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in fresh cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Several studies have assessed the relationship between exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ≤10 μm (PM10) and assisted reproduction technology (ART) success rates, with controversial findings. This review aimed to consolidate the current evidence from fresh ART cycles and explore sources of heterogeneity across studies. The outcomes of interest were biochemical and clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Four exposure timeframes were considered: T0 (within 90 days before starting the stimulation protocol), T1 (from the first day of stimulation protocol to oocyte retrieval), T2 (from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer), and T3 (from embryo transfer to pregnancy).
Database searches were conducted on PubMed/Medline and Embase up to April 2025, using a combination of MeSH/Emtree and generic terms relating to ART patients and air pollution exposure. Fourteen studies, involving 333,438 cycles, were included in the meta-analysis. The studies were conducted between 2010 and 2024 primarily in China (10/14), while 3 were from the USA and one from Korea. We estimated pooled relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for a 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 and PM10 for biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live births, using random-effects meta-analytic models.
The pooled RRs for 10 μg/m3 increment in PM2.5 and PM10 at T0 were respectively 0.97 (95%CI: 0.91–1.04) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95–1.02) for biochemical pregnancy; for clinical pregnancy they were respectively 0.98 (95%CI: 0.96–1.01) and 0.99 (95%CI: 0.98–1.00). All other findings were close to unity. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies for selected outcomes and exposure periods for both pollutants.
This systematic review found no significant association between PM2.5 and PM10 exposure and ART outcomes after fresh embryo transfer for any of the four exposure windows.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.