基于时间序列特征提取和机器学习的震颤表型鉴别

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Verena Häring, Veronika Selzam, Juan Francisco Martin‐Rodriguez, Petra Schwingenschuh, Gertrúd Tamás, Linda Köhler, Jan Raethjen, Steffen Paschen, Franziska Goltz, Eoin Mulroy, Anna Latorre, Pablo Mir, Rick C. Helmich, Kailash P. Bhatia, Jens Volkmann, Robert Peach, Sebastian R. Schreglmann
{"title":"基于时间序列特征提取和机器学习的震颤表型鉴别","authors":"Verena Häring, Veronika Selzam, Juan Francisco Martin‐Rodriguez, Petra Schwingenschuh, Gertrúd Tamás, Linda Köhler, Jan Raethjen, Steffen Paschen, Franziska Goltz, Eoin Mulroy, Anna Latorre, Pablo Mir, Rick C. Helmich, Kailash P. Bhatia, Jens Volkmann, Robert Peach, Sebastian R. Schreglmann","doi":"10.1002/mds.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundThe clinical diagnosis of tremor disorders depends on the interpretation of subtle movement characteristics, signs, and symptoms. Given the absence of a universally accepted biomarker, differentiation between essential tremor (ET) and tremor‐dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently proves to be non‐trivial.ObjectiveTo identify generalizable tremor characteristics to differentiate ET and PD using feature extraction and machine learning (ML).MethodsHand accelerometer recordings from 414 patients, clinically diagnosed at six academic centers, formed an exploratory (158 ET, 172 PD) and a validation dataset (30 ET, 54 PD). Established, standardized tremor characteristics were assessed for their cross‐center accuracy and validity. Supervised ML was applied to massive higher‐order feature extraction of the same recordings to achieve optimal stratification and mechanistic exploration.ResultsWhile classic tremor characteristics did not consistently differentiate between conditions across centers, the feature combination identified via our ML approach was successfully validated. In comparison with the tremor stability index (TSI), feature‐based analysis provided better classification accuracy (81.8% vs. 70.4%), sensitivity (86.4% vs. 70.8%), and specificity (76.6% vs. 70.2%), substantially improving disease stratification. The interpretation of identified features indicates fundamentally different dynamics in tremor‐generating circuits: while different discrete but stable signal states in PD indicate several central oscillators, signal characteristics in ET point towards a singular pacemaker.ConclusionThis study establishes the use of feature‐based ML as a powerful method to explore accelerometry‐derived tremor signals. The combination of hypothesis‐free, data‐driven analyses and a large, multicenter dataset represents a relevant step towards big data analysis in tremor disorders. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phenotypical Differentiation of Tremor Using Time Series Feature Extraction and Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Verena Häring, Veronika Selzam, Juan Francisco Martin‐Rodriguez, Petra Schwingenschuh, Gertrúd Tamás, Linda Köhler, Jan Raethjen, Steffen Paschen, Franziska Goltz, Eoin Mulroy, Anna Latorre, Pablo Mir, Rick C. Helmich, Kailash P. Bhatia, Jens Volkmann, Robert Peach, Sebastian R. Schreglmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundThe clinical diagnosis of tremor disorders depends on the interpretation of subtle movement characteristics, signs, and symptoms. Given the absence of a universally accepted biomarker, differentiation between essential tremor (ET) and tremor‐dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently proves to be non‐trivial.ObjectiveTo identify generalizable tremor characteristics to differentiate ET and PD using feature extraction and machine learning (ML).MethodsHand accelerometer recordings from 414 patients, clinically diagnosed at six academic centers, formed an exploratory (158 ET, 172 PD) and a validation dataset (30 ET, 54 PD). Established, standardized tremor characteristics were assessed for their cross‐center accuracy and validity. Supervised ML was applied to massive higher‐order feature extraction of the same recordings to achieve optimal stratification and mechanistic exploration.ResultsWhile classic tremor characteristics did not consistently differentiate between conditions across centers, the feature combination identified via our ML approach was successfully validated. In comparison with the tremor stability index (TSI), feature‐based analysis provided better classification accuracy (81.8% vs. 70.4%), sensitivity (86.4% vs. 70.8%), and specificity (76.6% vs. 70.2%), substantially improving disease stratification. The interpretation of identified features indicates fundamentally different dynamics in tremor‐generating circuits: while different discrete but stable signal states in PD indicate several central oscillators, signal characteristics in ET point towards a singular pacemaker.ConclusionThis study establishes the use of feature‐based ML as a powerful method to explore accelerometry‐derived tremor signals. The combination of hypothesis‐free, data‐driven analyses and a large, multicenter dataset represents a relevant step towards big data analysis in tremor disorders. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70032\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景震颤障碍的临床诊断依赖于对细微运动特征、体征和症状的解释。由于缺乏普遍接受的生物标志物,原发性震颤(ET)和震颤主导型帕金森病(PD)之间的区分经常被证明是非常重要的。目的利用特征提取和机器学习(ML)技术鉴别震颤特征以区分ET和PD。方法来自6个学术中心临床诊断的414例患者的手加速度计记录,形成探索性(158 ET, 172 PD)和验证性数据集(30 ET, 54 PD)。已建立的标准化震颤特征评估其跨中心准确性和有效性。监督式机器学习应用于相同录音的大量高阶特征提取,以实现最佳分层和机制探索。结果:虽然经典的震颤特征不能一致地区分不同中心的条件,但通过我们的机器学习方法确定的特征组合已成功验证。与震颤稳定指数(TSI)相比,基于特征的分析提供了更好的分类准确率(81.8% vs. 70.4%)、灵敏度(86.4% vs. 70.8%)和特异性(76.6% vs. 70.2%),大大改善了疾病分层。对已识别特征的解释表明,震颤产生电路的动力学特性根本不同:PD中不同的离散但稳定的信号状态表明有几个中心振荡器,而ET中的信号特征指向一个单一的起搏器。结论本研究建立了基于特征的机器学习作为一种有效的方法来探索由加速度计产生的震颤信号。无假设、数据驱动的分析与大型、多中心数据集的结合代表了震颤障碍大数据分析的相关步骤。©2025作者。Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表国际帕金森和运动障碍学会出版的《运动障碍》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phenotypical Differentiation of Tremor Using Time Series Feature Extraction and Machine Learning
BackgroundThe clinical diagnosis of tremor disorders depends on the interpretation of subtle movement characteristics, signs, and symptoms. Given the absence of a universally accepted biomarker, differentiation between essential tremor (ET) and tremor‐dominant Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently proves to be non‐trivial.ObjectiveTo identify generalizable tremor characteristics to differentiate ET and PD using feature extraction and machine learning (ML).MethodsHand accelerometer recordings from 414 patients, clinically diagnosed at six academic centers, formed an exploratory (158 ET, 172 PD) and a validation dataset (30 ET, 54 PD). Established, standardized tremor characteristics were assessed for their cross‐center accuracy and validity. Supervised ML was applied to massive higher‐order feature extraction of the same recordings to achieve optimal stratification and mechanistic exploration.ResultsWhile classic tremor characteristics did not consistently differentiate between conditions across centers, the feature combination identified via our ML approach was successfully validated. In comparison with the tremor stability index (TSI), feature‐based analysis provided better classification accuracy (81.8% vs. 70.4%), sensitivity (86.4% vs. 70.8%), and specificity (76.6% vs. 70.2%), substantially improving disease stratification. The interpretation of identified features indicates fundamentally different dynamics in tremor‐generating circuits: while different discrete but stable signal states in PD indicate several central oscillators, signal characteristics in ET point towards a singular pacemaker.ConclusionThis study establishes the use of feature‐based ML as a powerful method to explore accelerometry‐derived tremor signals. The combination of hypothesis‐free, data‐driven analyses and a large, multicenter dataset represents a relevant step towards big data analysis in tremor disorders. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信