Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Virginia Martínez-Ruiz, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto, Amira Bouzalmate-Hajjaj, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Paloma Masso-Guijarro
{"title":"患者和公众参与一项随机研究:地中海饮食试验中参与者经历的定性研究。","authors":"Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Virginia Martínez-Ruiz, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto, Amira Bouzalmate-Hajjaj, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Paloma Masso-Guijarro","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) based on Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) have reported that higher adherence is associated with better health outcomes. Our aim was to describe the perspectives and experiences of older adults in a MedDiet RCT for cardiovascular disease prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three focus groups on 25 participants from a MedDiet RCT, aged from 63 to 76 years old, were conducted after a conference on patient and public involvement in research at the University of Granada (Spain). Each focus group, comprising 8-10 participants, was audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were motivated by research team commitment during follow-up, improved health status and chronic disease management, weight loss, and enhanced health literacy. Health benefits among cohabitants were highlighted by female participants. A more personalized counselling and transparency with disclosure of the results of their tests and on-going study findings were missed. Participants were willing to collaborate in the dissemination of findings. Involving patients in RCTs would align the interventions with their needs and health conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of an RCT, participants could join the research team, identifying key questions, planning study design, contributing to the intervention protocol, and helping disseminate results by selecting the best platforms for sharing findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and public involvement in a randomized study: a qualitative study of participants' experiences in a Mediterranean Diet trial.\",\"authors\":\"Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Virginia Martínez-Ruiz, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto, Amira Bouzalmate-Hajjaj, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Paloma Masso-Guijarro\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) based on Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) have reported that higher adherence is associated with better health outcomes. Our aim was to describe the perspectives and experiences of older adults in a MedDiet RCT for cardiovascular disease prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three focus groups on 25 participants from a MedDiet RCT, aged from 63 to 76 years old, were conducted after a conference on patient and public involvement in research at the University of Granada (Spain). Each focus group, comprising 8-10 participants, was audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were motivated by research team commitment during follow-up, improved health status and chronic disease management, weight loss, and enhanced health literacy. Health benefits among cohabitants were highlighted by female participants. A more personalized counselling and transparency with disclosure of the results of their tests and on-going study findings were missed. Participants were willing to collaborate in the dissemination of findings. Involving patients in RCTs would align the interventions with their needs and health conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the context of an RCT, participants could join the research team, identifying key questions, planning study design, contributing to the intervention protocol, and helping disseminate results by selecting the best platforms for sharing findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:基于地中海饮食(MedDiet)的随机临床试验(rct)已经报道,更高的依从性与更好的健康结果相关。我们的目的是描述MedDiet随机对照试验中老年人预防心血管疾病的观点和经验。方法:在西班牙格拉纳达大学(University of Granada)举行的患者和公众参与研究会议后,对来自MedDiet随机对照试验的25名参与者进行了三个焦点小组,年龄从63岁到76岁。每个焦点小组由8-10名参与者组成,录音、转录并进行主题分析。结果:参与者在随访期间受到研究团队承诺的激励,健康状况和慢性疾病管理得到改善,体重减轻,健康素养得到提高。女性参与者强调了同居者的健康益处。他们错过了更加个性化的咨询和透明度,披露了他们的测试结果和正在进行的研究结果。与会者愿意在传播调查结果方面进行合作。让患者参与随机对照试验将使干预措施与他们的需求和健康状况保持一致。结论:在随机对照试验的背景下,参与者可以加入研究团队,确定关键问题,规划研究设计,参与干预方案,并通过选择最佳平台来分享结果,帮助传播结果。
Patient and public involvement in a randomized study: a qualitative study of participants' experiences in a Mediterranean Diet trial.
Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) based on Mediterranean Diet (MedDiet) have reported that higher adherence is associated with better health outcomes. Our aim was to describe the perspectives and experiences of older adults in a MedDiet RCT for cardiovascular disease prevention.
Methods: Three focus groups on 25 participants from a MedDiet RCT, aged from 63 to 76 years old, were conducted after a conference on patient and public involvement in research at the University of Granada (Spain). Each focus group, comprising 8-10 participants, was audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed.
Results: Participants were motivated by research team commitment during follow-up, improved health status and chronic disease management, weight loss, and enhanced health literacy. Health benefits among cohabitants were highlighted by female participants. A more personalized counselling and transparency with disclosure of the results of their tests and on-going study findings were missed. Participants were willing to collaborate in the dissemination of findings. Involving patients in RCTs would align the interventions with their needs and health conditions.
Conclusion: In the context of an RCT, participants could join the research team, identifying key questions, planning study design, contributing to the intervention protocol, and helping disseminate results by selecting the best platforms for sharing findings.