Sofie Van Wesemael, Elke Vlemincx, Nina Goossens, Remco Baggen, Sim Klaps, Katleen Bogaerts, Lotte Janssens
{"title":"剧本驱动的情绪意象对健康个体姿势控制的影响。","authors":"Sofie Van Wesemael, Elke Vlemincx, Nina Goossens, Remco Baggen, Sim Klaps, Katleen Bogaerts, Lotte Janssens","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although emotions and postural control are strongly intertwined, more research is necessary to understand this intricate relationship. Therefore, we examined the effect of script-driven emotional imagery on postural control in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four healthy participants (50 % female, median age=27) imagined three emotional imagery scripts (hostile, acceptance, relaxation) in upright standing without visual input while center of pressure (CoP) was measured (mean sway, sway velocity, , and standard deviation in antero-posterior and medio-lateral directions, and sway path and area). After each script, valence, arousal, and dominance were rated with the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) to check whether emotion induction was successful. Effects of emotional imagery on CoP and SAM were analyzed through mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotions were successfully induced; participants felt less pleasant (p < 0.0001), more aroused (p < 0.0001), and less in control (p < 0.0001) during hostile compared to acceptance and relaxation scripts. Inducing emotions did not affect CoP (p > 0.05), with the exception of antero-posterior CoP sway, which was significantly smaller during relaxation compared to acceptance scripts (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although emotions were successfully induced, they minimally affected postural control in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings suggest that healthy individuals may adopt flexible postural compensation strategies to successfully adjust for emotion-induced perturbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of script-driven emotional imagery on postural control in healthy individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Van Wesemael, Elke Vlemincx, Nina Goossens, Remco Baggen, Sim Klaps, Katleen Bogaerts, Lotte Janssens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although emotions and postural control are strongly intertwined, more research is necessary to understand this intricate relationship. Therefore, we examined the effect of script-driven emotional imagery on postural control in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-four healthy participants (50 % female, median age=27) imagined three emotional imagery scripts (hostile, acceptance, relaxation) in upright standing without visual input while center of pressure (CoP) was measured (mean sway, sway velocity, , and standard deviation in antero-posterior and medio-lateral directions, and sway path and area). After each script, valence, arousal, and dominance were rated with the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) to check whether emotion induction was successful. Effects of emotional imagery on CoP and SAM were analyzed through mixed models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotions were successfully induced; participants felt less pleasant (p < 0.0001), more aroused (p < 0.0001), and less in control (p < 0.0001) during hostile compared to acceptance and relaxation scripts. Inducing emotions did not affect CoP (p > 0.05), with the exception of antero-posterior CoP sway, which was significantly smaller during relaxation compared to acceptance scripts (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although emotions were successfully induced, they minimally affected postural control in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>These findings suggest that healthy individuals may adopt flexible postural compensation strategies to successfully adjust for emotion-induced perturbations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of script-driven emotional imagery on postural control in healthy individuals.
Objective: Although emotions and postural control are strongly intertwined, more research is necessary to understand this intricate relationship. Therefore, we examined the effect of script-driven emotional imagery on postural control in healthy individuals.
Methods: Forty-four healthy participants (50 % female, median age=27) imagined three emotional imagery scripts (hostile, acceptance, relaxation) in upright standing without visual input while center of pressure (CoP) was measured (mean sway, sway velocity, , and standard deviation in antero-posterior and medio-lateral directions, and sway path and area). After each script, valence, arousal, and dominance were rated with the Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) to check whether emotion induction was successful. Effects of emotional imagery on CoP and SAM were analyzed through mixed models.
Results: Emotions were successfully induced; participants felt less pleasant (p < 0.0001), more aroused (p < 0.0001), and less in control (p < 0.0001) during hostile compared to acceptance and relaxation scripts. Inducing emotions did not affect CoP (p > 0.05), with the exception of antero-posterior CoP sway, which was significantly smaller during relaxation compared to acceptance scripts (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: Although emotions were successfully induced, they minimally affected postural control in healthy individuals.
Significance: These findings suggest that healthy individuals may adopt flexible postural compensation strategies to successfully adjust for emotion-induced perturbations.