儿童和青少年轻度腿长差异的步态不对称。

IF 2.4
Florian Dobler, Jana Ender, Harald Lengnick, Nathalie Alexander
{"title":"儿童和青少年轻度腿长差异的步态不对称。","authors":"Florian Dobler, Jana Ender, Harald Lengnick, Nathalie Alexander","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common orthopedic condition, yet its clinical significance remains debated. While severe LLD is typically managed surgically, the impact of mild LLD (< 2 cm) on gait asymmetry in children is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between mild LLD (< 2 cm) and gait asymmetries in children and adolescents and to compare these asymmetries to those observed in typically developing children (TDC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gait data from 475 patients (13.1 ± 2.3 years) were analyzed retrospectively. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3D motion analysis during barefoot level walking. Patients were categorized into four LLD groups (1-4 mm, 5-9 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-20 mm). Differences in gait asymmetries and relationships to LLD magnitude were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping ANOVA and regression. Differences in spatial-temporal parameters were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Clinical relevance of asymmetries was judged using normal asymmetry ranges of 40 TDC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased LLD was associated with greater pelvic obliquity, hip adduction, and internal hip rotation on the longer leg side, as well as increased hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and delayed heel rise. These gait asymmetries became clinically relevant compared to TDC at LLD ≥ 1 cm. Kinetic asymmetry differences were negligible.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Mild LLD < 1 cm does not significantly affect gait, while LLD ≥ 1 cm induces clinically relevant asymmetries, particularly in pelvic obliquity. These findings support the use of non-operative interventions, such as shoe lifts, for LLD exceeding 1 cm to mitigate gait asymmetries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait asymmetries in children and adolescents with mild leg length discrepancy.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Dobler, Jana Ender, Harald Lengnick, Nathalie Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common orthopedic condition, yet its clinical significance remains debated. While severe LLD is typically managed surgically, the impact of mild LLD (< 2 cm) on gait asymmetry in children is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>This study aims to assess the relationship between mild LLD (< 2 cm) and gait asymmetries in children and adolescents and to compare these asymmetries to those observed in typically developing children (TDC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gait data from 475 patients (13.1 ± 2.3 years) were analyzed retrospectively. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3D motion analysis during barefoot level walking. Patients were categorized into four LLD groups (1-4 mm, 5-9 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-20 mm). Differences in gait asymmetries and relationships to LLD magnitude were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping ANOVA and regression. Differences in spatial-temporal parameters were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Clinical relevance of asymmetries was judged using normal asymmetry ranges of 40 TDC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increased LLD was associated with greater pelvic obliquity, hip adduction, and internal hip rotation on the longer leg side, as well as increased hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and delayed heel rise. These gait asymmetries became clinically relevant compared to TDC at LLD ≥ 1 cm. Kinetic asymmetry differences were negligible.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Mild LLD < 1 cm does not significantly affect gait, while LLD ≥ 1 cm induces clinically relevant asymmetries, particularly in pelvic obliquity. These findings support the use of non-operative interventions, such as shoe lifts, for LLD exceeding 1 cm to mitigate gait asymmetries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.08.078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腿长差异(LLD)是一种常见的骨科疾病,但其临床意义仍有争议。虽然严重的LLD通常通过手术治疗,但轻度LLD(< 2 cm)对儿童步态不对称的影响尚不清楚。研究问题:本研究旨在评估儿童和青少年轻度LLD(< 2 cm)与步态不对称之间的关系,并将这些不对称与典型发育儿童(TDC)观察到的不对称进行比较。方法:回顾性分析475例患者(13.1 ± 2.3年)的步态数据。利用三维运动分析收集赤脚水平行走时的运动学和动力学数据。患者分为4组LLD(1-4 mm, 5-9 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-20 mm)。采用统计参数映射方差分析和回归分析步态不对称的差异及其与LLD大小的关系。采用单因素方差分析分析时空参数差异。以40 TDC的正常不对称范围判断不对称的临床意义。结果:LLD升高与更大的骨盆倾斜、髋关节内收、较长腿侧髋关节内旋以及髋屈曲、膝关节屈曲、踝关节背屈和脚跟上升延迟有关。与LLD≥ 1 cm的TDC相比,这些步态不对称具有临床相关性。动力学不对称差异可以忽略不计。意义:轻度LLD
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gait asymmetries in children and adolescents with mild leg length discrepancy.

Background: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common orthopedic condition, yet its clinical significance remains debated. While severe LLD is typically managed surgically, the impact of mild LLD (< 2 cm) on gait asymmetry in children is not well understood.

Research question: This study aims to assess the relationship between mild LLD (< 2 cm) and gait asymmetries in children and adolescents and to compare these asymmetries to those observed in typically developing children (TDC).

Methods: Gait data from 475 patients (13.1 ± 2.3 years) were analyzed retrospectively. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using 3D motion analysis during barefoot level walking. Patients were categorized into four LLD groups (1-4 mm, 5-9 mm, 10-14 mm, 15-20 mm). Differences in gait asymmetries and relationships to LLD magnitude were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping ANOVA and regression. Differences in spatial-temporal parameters were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Clinical relevance of asymmetries was judged using normal asymmetry ranges of 40 TDC.

Results: Increased LLD was associated with greater pelvic obliquity, hip adduction, and internal hip rotation on the longer leg side, as well as increased hip flexion, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, and delayed heel rise. These gait asymmetries became clinically relevant compared to TDC at LLD ≥ 1 cm. Kinetic asymmetry differences were negligible.

Significance: Mild LLD < 1 cm does not significantly affect gait, while LLD ≥ 1 cm induces clinically relevant asymmetries, particularly in pelvic obliquity. These findings support the use of non-operative interventions, such as shoe lifts, for LLD exceeding 1 cm to mitigate gait asymmetries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信