{"title":"中国非/最小化透视消融治疗阵发性房颤的多中心实践:PAF-ICE试验","authors":"Yunhe Wang, Deyong Long, Fangyi Xiao, Minglong Chen, Xingpeng Liu, Jidong Zhang, Yumei Xue, Jie Fan, Haixiong Wang, Mengzuo Wu, Rui Wang, Jia Li, Tao He, Weili Ge, Xiaobo Huang, Ruhong Jiang, Qiang Liu, Zuwen Zhang, Guosheng Fu, Chenyang Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, but its effectiveness and safety still lack multicenter evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICE-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation compared with the traditional fluoroscopy-guided approach in patients with paroxysmal AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 448 patients with paroxysmal AF, from 15 centers in China, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a non/minimized-fluoroscopy group (n = 223) and a traditional approach group (n = 225). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7) months, 184 of 223 patients (82.5%) in the non/minimized-fluoroscopy group and 189 of 225 (84.0%) in the traditional approach group remained free from arrhythmia. Cox analysis showed a HR of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 to 1.164); P = 0.858, demonstrating the noninferiority of the non/minimized-fluoroscopy approach. The primary safety endpoint did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (P = 0.975). This protocol enabled near zero-radiation procedures (mean <1 mGy) in 7 of 15 centers (46.7%), and radiation-free AF ablation in 125 of 223 patients (56.1%), significantly reducing x-ray exposure and operator radiation protection equipment usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE-combined non/minimized-fluoroscopy AF ablation was noninferior in effectiveness compared to traditional AF ablation, with no significant difference in safety endpoints, indicating its potential of widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":73529,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Asia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Practice of Non/Minimized Fluoroscopy Ablation for Paroxysmal AF in China: The PAF-ICE Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yunhe Wang, Deyong Long, Fangyi Xiao, Minglong Chen, Xingpeng Liu, Jidong Zhang, Yumei Xue, Jie Fan, Haixiong Wang, Mengzuo Wu, Rui Wang, Jia Li, Tao He, Weili Ge, Xiaobo Huang, Ruhong Jiang, Qiang Liu, Zuwen Zhang, Guosheng Fu, Chenyang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, but its effectiveness and safety still lack multicenter evidence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICE-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation compared with the traditional fluoroscopy-guided approach in patients with paroxysmal AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 448 patients with paroxysmal AF, from 15 centers in China, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a non/minimized-fluoroscopy group (n = 223) and a traditional approach group (n = 225). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and other serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7) months, 184 of 223 patients (82.5%) in the non/minimized-fluoroscopy group and 189 of 225 (84.0%) in the traditional approach group remained free from arrhythmia. Cox analysis showed a HR of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 to 1.164); P = 0.858, demonstrating the noninferiority of the non/minimized-fluoroscopy approach. The primary safety endpoint did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (P = 0.975). This protocol enabled near zero-radiation procedures (mean <1 mGy) in 7 of 15 centers (46.7%), and radiation-free AF ablation in 125 of 223 patients (56.1%), significantly reducing x-ray exposure and operator radiation protection equipment usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE-combined non/minimized-fluoroscopy AF ablation was noninferior in effectiveness compared to traditional AF ablation, with no significant difference in safety endpoints, indicating its potential of widespread adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Asia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2025.07.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multicenter Practice of Non/Minimized Fluoroscopy Ablation for Paroxysmal AF in China: The PAF-ICE Trial.
Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been reported, but its effectiveness and safety still lack multicenter evidence.
Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICE-guided non/minimized-fluoroscopy catheter ablation compared with the traditional fluoroscopy-guided approach in patients with paroxysmal AF.
Methods: A total of 448 patients with paroxysmal AF, from 15 centers in China, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a non/minimized-fluoroscopy group (n = 223) and a traditional approach group (n = 225). The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF recurrence after a single ablation procedure. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of death from any cause, stroke or transient ischemic attack, and other serious adverse events.
Results: Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients. After a median follow-up of 12.2 (Q1-Q3: 8.8-17.7) months, 184 of 223 patients (82.5%) in the non/minimized-fluoroscopy group and 189 of 225 (84.0%) in the traditional approach group remained free from arrhythmia. Cox analysis showed a HR of 0.949 (95% CI: 0.774 to 1.164); P = 0.858, demonstrating the noninferiority of the non/minimized-fluoroscopy approach. The primary safety endpoint did not differ significantly in the 2 groups (P = 0.975). This protocol enabled near zero-radiation procedures (mean <1 mGy) in 7 of 15 centers (46.7%), and radiation-free AF ablation in 125 of 223 patients (56.1%), significantly reducing x-ray exposure and operator radiation protection equipment usage.
Conclusions: ICE-combined non/minimized-fluoroscopy AF ablation was noninferior in effectiveness compared to traditional AF ablation, with no significant difference in safety endpoints, indicating its potential of widespread adoption.