绘制美国学校的月经健康和卫生进展:系统的政策审查和各州的比较。

IF 2.9 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in reproductive health Pub Date : 2025-08-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frph.2025.1589772
April M Ballard, Emily Wallace, Pranitha Kaza, Shannon Self-Brown, Matthew C Freeman, Bethany A Caruso
{"title":"绘制美国学校的月经健康和卫生进展:系统的政策审查和各州的比较。","authors":"April M Ballard, Emily Wallace, Pranitha Kaza, Shannon Self-Brown, Matthew C Freeman, Bethany A Caruso","doi":"10.3389/frph.2025.1589772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) policy initiatives have emerged as a key strategy to improve adolescent MHH, particularly through the expansion of state-level legislation aimed at increasing access to menstrual materials in K-12 schools in the United States (US). However, limited research has evaluated the implementation or effectiveness of these policies, and efforts to rigorously track and characterize existing policies remain limited. This study systematically reviewed and characterized state-level policies concerning menstrual material access in K-12 schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of all 50 US state government websites and legal databases to identify relevant legislation. Using MHH domains covered by the indicators recommended by the Global MHH Monitoring Group, we characterized policies. We also estimated policy reach by state and overall using National Center for Education Statistics enrollment data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 32 (64%) US states have enacted policies since 2017, which have the potential to improve MHH for approximately nine million, or 34%, of K-12 students. Most policies lack comprehensive coverage of essential MHH domains, including only three of the seven MHH domains on average.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight the need for more rigorous research to evaluate the effectiveness of different policies and identify the best strategies for implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73103,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in reproductive health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1589772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping menstrual health and hygiene progress in US schools: a systematic policy review and comparison across states.\",\"authors\":\"April M Ballard, Emily Wallace, Pranitha Kaza, Shannon Self-Brown, Matthew C Freeman, Bethany A Caruso\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frph.2025.1589772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) policy initiatives have emerged as a key strategy to improve adolescent MHH, particularly through the expansion of state-level legislation aimed at increasing access to menstrual materials in K-12 schools in the United States (US). However, limited research has evaluated the implementation or effectiveness of these policies, and efforts to rigorously track and characterize existing policies remain limited. This study systematically reviewed and characterized state-level policies concerning menstrual material access in K-12 schools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of all 50 US state government websites and legal databases to identify relevant legislation. Using MHH domains covered by the indicators recommended by the Global MHH Monitoring Group, we characterized policies. We also estimated policy reach by state and overall using National Center for Education Statistics enrollment data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 32 (64%) US states have enacted policies since 2017, which have the potential to improve MHH for approximately nine million, or 34%, of K-12 students. Most policies lack comprehensive coverage of essential MHH domains, including only three of the seven MHH domains on average.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight the need for more rigorous research to evaluate the effectiveness of different policies and identify the best strategies for implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in reproductive health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1589772\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1589772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2025.1589772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:月经健康和卫生政策举措已成为改善青少年月经健康和卫生的一项关键战略,特别是通过扩大州一级的立法,旨在增加美国K-12学校获得月经用品的机会。然而,有限的研究评估了这些政策的执行或有效性,严格跟踪和描述现有政策的努力仍然有限。本研究系统地回顾和描述了有关K-12学校月经材料获取的州级政策。方法:我们对美国所有50个州政府网站和法律数据库进行了全面的检索,以确定相关立法。利用全球卫生保健监测小组建议的指标所涵盖的卫生保健领域,我们对政策进行了描述。我们还利用国家教育统计中心的入学数据估计了各州和总体的政策覆盖面。结果:我们发现,自2017年以来,32个(64%)美国州制定了政策,这些政策有可能改善约900万(34%)K-12学生的MHH。大多数政策缺乏对基本卫生保健领域的全面覆盖,平均只包括七个卫生保健领域中的三个。讨论:这些发现突出表明,需要进行更严格的研究,以评估不同政策的有效性,并确定最佳的实施战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mapping menstrual health and hygiene progress in US schools: a systematic policy review and comparison across states.

Mapping menstrual health and hygiene progress in US schools: a systematic policy review and comparison across states.

Mapping menstrual health and hygiene progress in US schools: a systematic policy review and comparison across states.

Introduction: Menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) policy initiatives have emerged as a key strategy to improve adolescent MHH, particularly through the expansion of state-level legislation aimed at increasing access to menstrual materials in K-12 schools in the United States (US). However, limited research has evaluated the implementation or effectiveness of these policies, and efforts to rigorously track and characterize existing policies remain limited. This study systematically reviewed and characterized state-level policies concerning menstrual material access in K-12 schools.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of all 50 US state government websites and legal databases to identify relevant legislation. Using MHH domains covered by the indicators recommended by the Global MHH Monitoring Group, we characterized policies. We also estimated policy reach by state and overall using National Center for Education Statistics enrollment data.

Results: We found that 32 (64%) US states have enacted policies since 2017, which have the potential to improve MHH for approximately nine million, or 34%, of K-12 students. Most policies lack comprehensive coverage of essential MHH domains, including only three of the seven MHH domains on average.

Discussion: These findings highlight the need for more rigorous research to evaluate the effectiveness of different policies and identify the best strategies for implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信