通过文献计量学方法分析精神障碍的伦理维度:趋势和重点研究领域。

IF 1.4 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of Yeungnam medical science Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.12701/jyms.2025.42.54
Bo Wang, Oyyappan Duraipandi
{"title":"通过文献计量学方法分析精神障碍的伦理维度:趋势和重点研究领域。","authors":"Bo Wang, Oyyappan Duraipandi","doi":"10.12701/jyms.2025.42.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore key ethical issues related to mental disorders through a bibliometric and cluster-based content analysis of existing academic literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Scopus database (Elsevier) up to December 31, 2024, using ethics-and mental disorder-related keywords. The search was limited to English-language journal articles in medicine, psychology, neuroscience, and other related fields. After title and abstract screening, 1,271 articles were included (κ=0.907). Bibliometric analyses including keyword co-occurrence, citation coupling, and country/author mapping were performed using VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) and Gephi (Gephi Consortium). A cluster-based content analysis was used to interpret the thematic structure of the field. The annual publication volume showed an upward fluctuating trend, with increasing scholarly attention post-1994. Coauthor networks revealed weak centralization, and the core author group remained underdeveloped. Research has been geographically concentrated in North America and Western Europe, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Keyword analysis identified six major thematic clusters: (1) conceptual foundations and policy frameworks in mental health ethics, (2) ethical challenges in psychiatric care, (3) research ethics, (4) patient autonomy and rights, (5) end-of-life decision-making and palliative ethics, and (6) neuroethics and emerging biomedical technologies. Recent popular topics include artificial intelligence, epistemic injustice, and medical aid for the dying. This study maps the intellectual structure and evolving focus of the ethical discourse on mental health. These findings highlight the need for ethically responsive frameworks that address patient autonomy, technological advancement, and global equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":74020,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","volume":"42 ","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing ethical dimensions of mental disorders: trends and key research areas through bibliometric methods.\",\"authors\":\"Bo Wang, Oyyappan Duraipandi\",\"doi\":\"10.12701/jyms.2025.42.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to explore key ethical issues related to mental disorders through a bibliometric and cluster-based content analysis of existing academic literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Scopus database (Elsevier) up to December 31, 2024, using ethics-and mental disorder-related keywords. The search was limited to English-language journal articles in medicine, psychology, neuroscience, and other related fields. After title and abstract screening, 1,271 articles were included (κ=0.907). Bibliometric analyses including keyword co-occurrence, citation coupling, and country/author mapping were performed using VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) and Gephi (Gephi Consortium). A cluster-based content analysis was used to interpret the thematic structure of the field. The annual publication volume showed an upward fluctuating trend, with increasing scholarly attention post-1994. Coauthor networks revealed weak centralization, and the core author group remained underdeveloped. Research has been geographically concentrated in North America and Western Europe, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Keyword analysis identified six major thematic clusters: (1) conceptual foundations and policy frameworks in mental health ethics, (2) ethical challenges in psychiatric care, (3) research ethics, (4) patient autonomy and rights, (5) end-of-life decision-making and palliative ethics, and (6) neuroethics and emerging biomedical technologies. Recent popular topics include artificial intelligence, epistemic injustice, and medical aid for the dying. This study maps the intellectual structure and evolving focus of the ethical discourse on mental health. These findings highlight the need for ethically responsive frameworks that address patient autonomy, technological advancement, and global equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Yeungnam medical science\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Yeungnam medical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2025.42.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Yeungnam medical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2025.42.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过文献计量学和基于聚类的现有学术文献内容分析,探讨与精神障碍相关的关键伦理问题。在截止到2024年12月31日的Scopus数据库(Elsevier)中,使用伦理学和精神障碍相关的关键词进行了全面的文献检索。搜索仅限于医学、心理学、神经科学和其他相关领域的英文期刊文章。经过标题和摘要筛选,共纳入1271篇文献(κ=0.907)。使用VOSviewer(莱顿大学科学技术研究中心)和Gephi (Gephi联盟)进行文献计量学分析,包括关键词共现、引文耦合和国家/作者映射。使用基于聚类的内容分析来解释该领域的主题结构。年度出版物数量呈上升波动趋势,1994年以后的学术关注日益增加。共同作者网络集中化程度较弱,核心作者群体发展滞后。研究在地理上集中在北美和西欧,特别是在美国、英国和加拿大。关键词分析确定了六大主题集群:(1)心理健康伦理的概念基础和政策框架,(2)精神科护理的伦理挑战,(3)研究伦理,(4)患者自主权和权利,(5)临终决策和姑息治疗伦理,(6)神经伦理学和新兴生物医学技术。最近的热门话题包括人工智能、认知不公和临终医疗救助。本研究描绘了心理健康伦理话语的智力结构和演变焦点。这些发现突出表明,需要建立符合伦理道德的框架,以解决患者自主、技术进步和全球公平问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing ethical dimensions of mental disorders: trends and key research areas through bibliometric methods.

This study aimed to explore key ethical issues related to mental disorders through a bibliometric and cluster-based content analysis of existing academic literature. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the Scopus database (Elsevier) up to December 31, 2024, using ethics-and mental disorder-related keywords. The search was limited to English-language journal articles in medicine, psychology, neuroscience, and other related fields. After title and abstract screening, 1,271 articles were included (κ=0.907). Bibliometric analyses including keyword co-occurrence, citation coupling, and country/author mapping were performed using VOSviewer (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University) and Gephi (Gephi Consortium). A cluster-based content analysis was used to interpret the thematic structure of the field. The annual publication volume showed an upward fluctuating trend, with increasing scholarly attention post-1994. Coauthor networks revealed weak centralization, and the core author group remained underdeveloped. Research has been geographically concentrated in North America and Western Europe, particularly in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Keyword analysis identified six major thematic clusters: (1) conceptual foundations and policy frameworks in mental health ethics, (2) ethical challenges in psychiatric care, (3) research ethics, (4) patient autonomy and rights, (5) end-of-life decision-making and palliative ethics, and (6) neuroethics and emerging biomedical technologies. Recent popular topics include artificial intelligence, epistemic injustice, and medical aid for the dying. This study maps the intellectual structure and evolving focus of the ethical discourse on mental health. These findings highlight the need for ethically responsive frameworks that address patient autonomy, technological advancement, and global equity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信