2019冠状病毒病的经验教训:高等教育接受电子学习技术

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Griffin Pitts, Viktoria Marcus, Sanaz Motamedi
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病的经验教训:高等教育接受电子学习技术","authors":"Griffin Pitts, Viktoria Marcus, Sanaz Motamedi","doi":"10.1177/00187208251372863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study investigates students' acceptance of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining differences between voluntary and involuntary use contexts.BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, universities shifted to online instruction for an extended period. E-learning became mandatory to use and was met with varying degrees of acceptance by students, whose educational expectations and experiences were altered. By 2022, institutions began transitioning to optional e-learning use, creating a natural setting to examine technology acceptance under both voluntary and involuntary conditions.MethodThis study employed a two-phase approach, first validating an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) incorporating seven factors derived from focus groups. Second, conducting multigroup analysis of acceptance between voluntary and involuntary users. Data was collected through surveys from 908 undergraduate students.ResultsPLS-SEM analysis revealed strong explanatory power (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .463-.731) for the extended TAM framework. Compatibility demonstrated the strongest effect on perceived usefulness, while information quality and system quality influenced both perceived usefulness and ease of use. Multigroup analysis revealed significant contextual differences in students' acceptance. Perceived ease of use more strongly influenced behavioral intention for voluntary users, while perceived usefulness had stronger effects for involuntary users.ConclusionThe extended TAM framework significantly predicted e-learning acceptance in both voluntary and involuntary contexts. Significant differences between usage scenarios were identified, extending TAM's applicability to crisis situations.ApplicationThis study provides insights for postpandemic educational technology implementation, emphasizing system quality and alignment with learning preferences. Practitioners should consider differences in adoption contexts when working to facilitate acceptance among both voluntary and mandatory users.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"187208251372863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned From COVID-19: Acceptance of E-Learning Technologies in Higher Education.\",\"authors\":\"Griffin Pitts, Viktoria Marcus, Sanaz Motamedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00187208251372863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study investigates students' acceptance of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining differences between voluntary and involuntary use contexts.BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, universities shifted to online instruction for an extended period. E-learning became mandatory to use and was met with varying degrees of acceptance by students, whose educational expectations and experiences were altered. By 2022, institutions began transitioning to optional e-learning use, creating a natural setting to examine technology acceptance under both voluntary and involuntary conditions.MethodThis study employed a two-phase approach, first validating an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) incorporating seven factors derived from focus groups. Second, conducting multigroup analysis of acceptance between voluntary and involuntary users. Data was collected through surveys from 908 undergraduate students.ResultsPLS-SEM analysis revealed strong explanatory power (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = .463-.731) for the extended TAM framework. Compatibility demonstrated the strongest effect on perceived usefulness, while information quality and system quality influenced both perceived usefulness and ease of use. Multigroup analysis revealed significant contextual differences in students' acceptance. Perceived ease of use more strongly influenced behavioral intention for voluntary users, while perceived usefulness had stronger effects for involuntary users.ConclusionThe extended TAM framework significantly predicted e-learning acceptance in both voluntary and involuntary contexts. Significant differences between usage scenarios were identified, extending TAM's applicability to crisis situations.ApplicationThis study provides insights for postpandemic educational technology implementation, emphasizing system quality and alignment with learning preferences. Practitioners should consider differences in adoption contexts when working to facilitate acceptance among both voluntary and mandatory users.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Factors\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"187208251372863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Factors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251372863\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208251372863","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究调查了2019冠状病毒病疫情期间学生接受电子学习的情况,考察了自愿和非自愿使用电子学习的情况之间的差异。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,大学在很长一段时间内转向在线教学。电子学习成为强制性使用,并在不同程度上得到学生的接受,他们的教育期望和经历发生了变化。到2022年,各院校开始过渡到可选的电子学习使用,创造了一个自然的环境来检查自愿和非自愿条件下的技术接受程度。方法本研究采用两阶段方法,首先验证一个扩展的技术接受模型(TAM),该模型包含来自焦点小组的七个因素。第二,对自愿用户和非自愿用户的接受度进行多群体分析。通过对908名本科生的调查收集数据。结果spls - sem分析显示,扩展TAM框架具有很强的解释力(R2 = .463 ~ .731)。兼容性对感知有用性的影响最大,而信息质量和系统质量对感知有用性和易用性都有影响。多组分析显示,学生的接受程度存在显著的语境差异。感知易用性对自愿用户的行为意向影响更大,而感知有用性对非自愿用户的行为意向影响更大。结论扩展的TAM框架显著预测了自愿和非自愿情境下的电子学习接受度。识别了使用场景之间的显著差异,扩展了TAM对危机情况的适用性。本研究为大流行后的教育技术实施提供了见解,强调系统质量和与学习偏好的一致性。在努力促进自愿用户和强制用户之间的接受时,从业者应该考虑采用环境的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons Learned From COVID-19: Acceptance of E-Learning Technologies in Higher Education.

ObjectiveThis study investigates students' acceptance of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining differences between voluntary and involuntary use contexts.BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, universities shifted to online instruction for an extended period. E-learning became mandatory to use and was met with varying degrees of acceptance by students, whose educational expectations and experiences were altered. By 2022, institutions began transitioning to optional e-learning use, creating a natural setting to examine technology acceptance under both voluntary and involuntary conditions.MethodThis study employed a two-phase approach, first validating an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) incorporating seven factors derived from focus groups. Second, conducting multigroup analysis of acceptance between voluntary and involuntary users. Data was collected through surveys from 908 undergraduate students.ResultsPLS-SEM analysis revealed strong explanatory power (R2 = .463-.731) for the extended TAM framework. Compatibility demonstrated the strongest effect on perceived usefulness, while information quality and system quality influenced both perceived usefulness and ease of use. Multigroup analysis revealed significant contextual differences in students' acceptance. Perceived ease of use more strongly influenced behavioral intention for voluntary users, while perceived usefulness had stronger effects for involuntary users.ConclusionThe extended TAM framework significantly predicted e-learning acceptance in both voluntary and involuntary contexts. Significant differences between usage scenarios were identified, extending TAM's applicability to crisis situations.ApplicationThis study provides insights for postpandemic educational technology implementation, emphasizing system quality and alignment with learning preferences. Practitioners should consider differences in adoption contexts when working to facilitate acceptance among both voluntary and mandatory users.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信