Chia-Hsin Wu, Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Eric J Hunter
{"title":"话音质量应变尺寸的声学度量:范围综述。","authors":"Chia-Hsin Wu, Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Eric J Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strained voice quality-commonly referred to as vocal strain-is a hallmark of functional voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia and is often associated with vocal fatigue and laryngeal hyperfunction. Although listeners describe it as excessive vocal effort, strained voice quality frequently overlaps perceptually with breathiness and roughness, complicating reliable assessment. Despite its clinical relevance, no standardized acoustic definition of strained voice quality has been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to identify and summarize the voice acoustic parameters reported in the literature to quantify the strain dimension of voice quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review with systematic elements was conducted using four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science) covering 1996 to 2024. Of 311 identified records, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included definitions of vocal strain, perceptual assessment tools, acoustic metrics, and methodological details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strain was consistently treated as a perceptual attribute of voice quality, often described as the impression of excessive effort. Common acoustic metrics included cepstral peak prominence (CPP), spectral slope, low-to-high (L/H) spectral ratio, and relative fundamental frequency (RFF). While several measures showed moderate-to-strong correlations with perceptual ratings of strain, methodological variability across studies limited direct comparisons and interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>Strained voice quality is perceptually complex and acoustically multifaceted. While no single metric reliably captures its full scope, acoustic measures-particularly spectral and cepstral features-can complement perceptual assessments. A multimodal approach that integrates listener-based impressions, acoustic analysis, and, where possible, physiological data is recommended to improve diagnostic consistency and guide future research into strain-sensitive voice assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Hsin Wu, Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva, Eric J Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strained voice quality-commonly referred to as vocal strain-is a hallmark of functional voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia and is often associated with vocal fatigue and laryngeal hyperfunction. Although listeners describe it as excessive vocal effort, strained voice quality frequently overlaps perceptually with breathiness and roughness, complicating reliable assessment. Despite its clinical relevance, no standardized acoustic definition of strained voice quality has been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to identify and summarize the voice acoustic parameters reported in the literature to quantify the strain dimension of voice quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review with systematic elements was conducted using four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science) covering 1996 to 2024. Of 311 identified records, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included definitions of vocal strain, perceptual assessment tools, acoustic metrics, and methodological details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strain was consistently treated as a perceptual attribute of voice quality, often described as the impression of excessive effort. Common acoustic metrics included cepstral peak prominence (CPP), spectral slope, low-to-high (L/H) spectral ratio, and relative fundamental frequency (RFF). While several measures showed moderate-to-strong correlations with perceptual ratings of strain, methodological variability across studies limited direct comparisons and interpretability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendations: </strong>Strained voice quality is perceptually complex and acoustically multifaceted. While no single metric reliably captures its full scope, acoustic measures-particularly spectral and cepstral features-can complement perceptual assessments. A multimodal approach that integrates listener-based impressions, acoustic analysis, and, where possible, physiological data is recommended to improve diagnostic consistency and guide future research into strain-sensitive voice assessment tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.08.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:声质紧张通常被称为声带紧张,是功能性声音障碍如肌肉紧张性发声障碍的标志,通常与声带疲劳和喉部功能亢进有关。尽管听众将其描述为声音过度用力,但紧张的音质在感知上经常与呼吸和粗糙重叠,使可靠的评估变得复杂。尽管具有临床意义,但没有建立张力语音质量的标准化声学定义。目的:本综述旨在识别和总结文献中报道的语音声学参数,以量化语音质量的应变维度。方法:采用ScienceDirect、PubMed、Virtual Health Library和Web of Science四个数据库对1996 - 2024年的文献进行系统要素的范围综述。在311个确定的记录中,有13个符合纳入标准。提取的数据包括声音张力的定义、感知评估工具、声学指标和方法细节。结果:张力一直被视为语音质量的感知属性,通常被描述为过度努力的印象。常用的声学指标包括倒谱峰突出(CPP)、谱斜率、低-高(L/H)谱比和相对基频(RFF)。虽然有几种测量方法显示了与应变感知等级的中强相关性,但研究方法的可变性限制了直接比较和可解释性。结论和建议:紧张的音质在感知上是复杂的,在声学上是多方面的。虽然没有单一的度量标准可以可靠地捕捉到它的全部范围,但声学测量——特别是频谱和倒谱特征——可以补充感知评估。建议采用一种多模态方法,将基于听者的印象、声学分析和可能的生理数据结合起来,以提高诊断的一致性,并指导未来对应变敏感语音评估工具的研究。
Acoustic Metrics of the Strain Dimension of Voice Quality: A Scoping Review.
Background: Strained voice quality-commonly referred to as vocal strain-is a hallmark of functional voice disorders such as muscle tension dysphonia and is often associated with vocal fatigue and laryngeal hyperfunction. Although listeners describe it as excessive vocal effort, strained voice quality frequently overlaps perceptually with breathiness and roughness, complicating reliable assessment. Despite its clinical relevance, no standardized acoustic definition of strained voice quality has been established.
Purpose: This review aims to identify and summarize the voice acoustic parameters reported in the literature to quantify the strain dimension of voice quality.
Methods: A scoping review with systematic elements was conducted using four databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Science) covering 1996 to 2024. Of 311 identified records, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Extracted data included definitions of vocal strain, perceptual assessment tools, acoustic metrics, and methodological details.
Results: Strain was consistently treated as a perceptual attribute of voice quality, often described as the impression of excessive effort. Common acoustic metrics included cepstral peak prominence (CPP), spectral slope, low-to-high (L/H) spectral ratio, and relative fundamental frequency (RFF). While several measures showed moderate-to-strong correlations with perceptual ratings of strain, methodological variability across studies limited direct comparisons and interpretability.
Conclusion and recommendations: Strained voice quality is perceptually complex and acoustically multifaceted. While no single metric reliably captures its full scope, acoustic measures-particularly spectral and cepstral features-can complement perceptual assessments. A multimodal approach that integrates listener-based impressions, acoustic analysis, and, where possible, physiological data is recommended to improve diagnostic consistency and guide future research into strain-sensitive voice assessment tools.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.