主动上肢治疗对脑瘫儿童手部功能、个人目标实现和自我护理的影响:网络荟萃分析。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea Burgess, Mark D Chatfield, Diana Hermith-Ramirez, Michelle Jackman, Megan Thorley, Sarah Reedman, Roslyn N Boyd, Leanne Sakzewski
{"title":"主动上肢治疗对脑瘫儿童手部功能、个人目标实现和自我护理的影响:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Andrea Burgess, Mark D Chatfield, Diana Hermith-Ramirez, Michelle Jackman, Megan Thorley, Sarah Reedman, Roslyn N Boyd, Leanne Sakzewski","doi":"10.1111/dmcn.16476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare active upper-limb therapies for children with cerebral palsy using a network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this systematic review, five electronic databases were searched up to 2nd September 2024. Outcomes pertaining to improved hand use (Assisting Hand Assessment, AHA), goal attainment (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM), and self-care were analysed with therapies classified into 15 discrete categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials (n = 1629) was performed. Compared with control, treatment effect on hand function (AHA mean difference, standard error) was greater for bimanual therapy (BiM: 4.6, 1.0), modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT; 4.0, 1.0), goal-directed therapy (GDT; 3.8, 1.6), action observation (4.9, 1.1), and mCIMT + intensive (7.4, 2.5). For COPM performance, treatment effect was greater for cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP; 5.9, 1.4), BiM (3.3, 0.4), mCIMT (2.5, 0.5), GDT (2.3, 0.7), mirror therapy (2.6, 1.2), and mCIMT + GDT (4.2, 1.1). For self-care, treatment effect (standardized mean difference, standard error) was greater for BiM (0.39, 0.10), mCIMT (0.37, 0.08), and mCIMT + GDT (0.43, 0.32).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BiM and mCIMT were confirmed as effective interventions for hand function, self-care, and individual goal achievement. Mirror therapy, CO-OP, and four different combination approaches feature single studies, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias, requiring further clinical trials to confirm efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50587,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Active upper-limb therapies for hand function, individual goal achievement, and self-care in children with cerebral palsy: A network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Burgess, Mark D Chatfield, Diana Hermith-Ramirez, Michelle Jackman, Megan Thorley, Sarah Reedman, Roslyn N Boyd, Leanne Sakzewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmcn.16476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare active upper-limb therapies for children with cerebral palsy using a network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this systematic review, five electronic databases were searched up to 2nd September 2024. Outcomes pertaining to improved hand use (Assisting Hand Assessment, AHA), goal attainment (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM), and self-care were analysed with therapies classified into 15 discrete categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials (n = 1629) was performed. Compared with control, treatment effect on hand function (AHA mean difference, standard error) was greater for bimanual therapy (BiM: 4.6, 1.0), modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT; 4.0, 1.0), goal-directed therapy (GDT; 3.8, 1.6), action observation (4.9, 1.1), and mCIMT + intensive (7.4, 2.5). For COPM performance, treatment effect was greater for cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP; 5.9, 1.4), BiM (3.3, 0.4), mCIMT (2.5, 0.5), GDT (2.3, 0.7), mirror therapy (2.6, 1.2), and mCIMT + GDT (4.2, 1.1). For self-care, treatment effect (standardized mean difference, standard error) was greater for BiM (0.39, 0.10), mCIMT (0.37, 0.08), and mCIMT + GDT (0.43, 0.32).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>BiM and mCIMT were confirmed as effective interventions for hand function, self-care, and individual goal achievement. Mirror therapy, CO-OP, and four different combination approaches feature single studies, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias, requiring further clinical trials to confirm efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50587,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16476\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16476","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过网络荟萃分析比较脑瘫儿童主动上肢治疗。方法:检索截至2024年9月2日的5个电子数据库。有关改善手部使用(辅助手部评估,AHA)、目标实现(加拿大职业绩效测量,COPM)和自我护理的结果被分析,治疗方法被分为15个独立的类别。结果:对48项随机对照试验(n = 1629)进行定量分析。与对照组相比,双手疗法(BiM: 4.6, 1.0)、改良约束诱导运动疗法(mCIMT; 4.0, 1.0)、目标导向疗法(GDT; 3.8, 1.6)、动作观察(4.9,1.1)和mCIMT +强化(7.4,2.5)对手部功能的治疗效果(AHA平均差值,标准误差)更大。对于COPM绩效,认知取向对职业绩效的治疗效果更大(CO-OP; 5.9, 1.4), BiM (3.3, 0.4), mCIMT (2.5, 0.5), GDT(2.3, 0.7),镜像治疗(2.6,1.2),mCIMT + GDT(4.2, 1.1)。在自我保健方面,BiM(0.39, 0.10)、mCIMT(0.37, 0.08)和mCIMT + GDT(0.43, 0.32)的治疗效果(标准化平均差,标准误差)更大。解释:BiM和mCIMT被证实是手部功能、自我保健和个人目标实现的有效干预措施。镜像疗法、CO-OP和四种不同的联合疗法的特点是研究单一、样本量小、偏倚风险高,需要进一步的临床试验来证实疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Active upper-limb therapies for hand function, individual goal achievement, and self-care in children with cerebral palsy: A network meta-analysis.

Aim: To compare active upper-limb therapies for children with cerebral palsy using a network meta-analysis.

Method: For this systematic review, five electronic databases were searched up to 2nd September 2024. Outcomes pertaining to improved hand use (Assisting Hand Assessment, AHA), goal attainment (Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, COPM), and self-care were analysed with therapies classified into 15 discrete categories.

Results: Quantitative analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials (n = 1629) was performed. Compared with control, treatment effect on hand function (AHA mean difference, standard error) was greater for bimanual therapy (BiM: 4.6, 1.0), modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT; 4.0, 1.0), goal-directed therapy (GDT; 3.8, 1.6), action observation (4.9, 1.1), and mCIMT + intensive (7.4, 2.5). For COPM performance, treatment effect was greater for cognitive orientation to occupational performance (CO-OP; 5.9, 1.4), BiM (3.3, 0.4), mCIMT (2.5, 0.5), GDT (2.3, 0.7), mirror therapy (2.6, 1.2), and mCIMT + GDT (4.2, 1.1). For self-care, treatment effect (standardized mean difference, standard error) was greater for BiM (0.39, 0.10), mCIMT (0.37, 0.08), and mCIMT + GDT (0.43, 0.32).

Interpretation: BiM and mCIMT were confirmed as effective interventions for hand function, self-care, and individual goal achievement. Mirror therapy, CO-OP, and four different combination approaches feature single studies, small sample sizes, and high risk of bias, requiring further clinical trials to confirm efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
13.20%
发文量
338
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Wiley-Blackwell is pleased to publish Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology (DMCN), a Mac Keith Press publication and official journal of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) and the British Paediatric Neurology Association (BPNA). For over 50 years, DMCN has defined the field of paediatric neurology and neurodisability and is one of the world’s leading journals in the whole field of paediatrics. DMCN disseminates a range of information worldwide to improve the lives of disabled children and their families. The high quality of published articles is maintained by expert review, including independent statistical assessment, before acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信