Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz
{"title":"探索3d打印氮化硅- peek复合材料在颈椎笼中的机械强度、抗菌性能和生物活性。","authors":"Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz","doi":"10.36922/ijb.2124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. <i>In vitro</i> cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</p>","PeriodicalId":48522,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioprinting","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.\",\"authors\":\"Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz\",\"doi\":\"10.36922/ijb.2124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. <i>In vitro</i> cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.
In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Bioprinting is a globally recognized publication that focuses on the advancements, scientific discoveries, and practical implementations of Bioprinting. Bioprinting, in simple terms, involves the utilization of 3D printing technology and materials that contain living cells or biological components to fabricate tissues or other biotechnological products. Our journal encompasses interdisciplinary research that spans across technology, science, and clinical applications within the expansive realm of Bioprinting.