探索3d打印氮化硅- peek复合材料在颈椎笼中的机械强度、抗菌性能和生物活性。

IF 6 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
International Journal of Bioprinting Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI:10.36922/ijb.2124
Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz
{"title":"探索3d打印氮化硅- peek复合材料在颈椎笼中的机械强度、抗菌性能和生物活性。","authors":"Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz","doi":"10.36922/ijb.2124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. <i>In vitro</i> cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</p>","PeriodicalId":48522,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioprinting","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.\",\"authors\":\"Cemile Basgul, Paul DeSantis, Tabitha Derr, Noreen J Hickok, Ryan M Bock, Steven M Kurtz\",\"doi\":\"10.36922/ijb.2124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i>. <i>In vitro</i> cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub>-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406975/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Bioprinting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2124\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.2124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们的目标是评估聚醚醚酮(PEEK)和氮化硅(Si3N4)聚合物复合材料用于抗菌三维(3D)打印颈椎笼的适用性。通用笼设计(PEEK和15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK)是3d打印的,包括固体和多孔笼设计。笼子按照ASTM F2077进行静态压缩、压缩剪切和扭转测试。用表皮葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌分别接种原丝和复合丝进行抑菌试验。使用MC3T3-E1小鼠成骨前细胞进行体外细胞测试,测量细胞增殖、累积矿化和成骨活性。3d打印的PEEK和Si3N4-PEEK保持架在所有设计中都表现出足够的机械强度,压缩强度超过14.7 kN,压缩剪切强度超过6.9 kN。与PEEK相比,Si3N4-PEEK的细菌粘附水平显著降低,降低了93.9% (1.21 log),并增强了细胞增殖。Si3N4-PEEK将允许定制制造3d打印脊柱植入物,与未填充的PEEK或金属合金相比,可以降低感染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.

Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.

Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.

Exploring the mechanical strength, antimicrobial performance, and bioactivity of 3D-printed silicon nitride-PEEK composites in cervical spinal cages.

In this study, our goal was to assess the suitability of a polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and silicon nitride (Si3N4) polymer composite for antimicrobial three-dimensional (3D)-printed cervical cages. Generic cage designs (PEEK and 15 vol.% Si3N4-PEEK) were 3D-printed, including solid and porous cage designs. Cages were tested in static compression, compression shear, and torsion per ASTM F2077. For antibacterial testing, virgin and composite filament samples were inoculated with Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. In vitro cell testing was conducted using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts, where cell proliferation, cumulative mineralization, and osteogenic activity were measured. The 3D-printed PEEK and Si3N4-PEEK cages exhibited adequate mechanical strength for all designs, exceeding 14.7 kN in compression and 6.9 kN in compression shear. Si3N4-PEEK exhibited significantly lower bacterial adhesion levels, with a 93.9% reduction (1.21 log), and enhanced cell proliferation when compared to PEEK. Si3N4-PEEK would allow for custom fabrication of 3D-printed spinal implants that reduce the risk of infection compared to unfilled PEEK or metallic alloys.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bioprinting is a globally recognized publication that focuses on the advancements, scientific discoveries, and practical implementations of Bioprinting. Bioprinting, in simple terms, involves the utilization of 3D printing technology and materials that contain living cells or biological components to fabricate tissues or other biotechnological products. Our journal encompasses interdisciplinary research that spans across technology, science, and clinical applications within the expansive realm of Bioprinting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信