{"title":"超声引导下皮质类固醇注射、射频消融及其联合治疗顽固性足底筋膜炎的比较疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Çile Aktan, Cemil Aktan","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (PF) refers to persistent heel pain lasting ≥ 6 months despite appropriate conservative management, including physical therapy, orthotics, and pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injection (CI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and their combination in patients with recalcitrant PF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 156 patients with ultrasonographically confirmed plantar fasciitis, experiencing heel pain for at least 6 months and unresponsive to ≥ 3 months of standard conservative therapy, were included; 52 received RFA, 50 received CI, and 54 underwent combined therapy. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional status (Foot Function Index [FFI], Roles and Maudsley score [RMS]), plantar fascia thickness (PFT), and relapse rates at 12 months were assessed. Within-group and between-group differences were assessed using appropriate nonparametric tests, and relapse rates were compared accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treatment modalities improved VAS, FFI, RMS, and PFT at 6 months (p < 0.001). VAS declined from 6.73 to 6.81 at baseline to 1.62 in the RFA group and 1.83 in the combined group, whereas remaining at 6.56 in the CI group. FFI dropped from ∼52 to 21.50 and 17.57 in the RFA and combined groups but remained at 46.62 in the CI. PFT decreased from ∼6.2 mm to 3.29, 2.71, and 2.95 mm, respectively. Relapse occurred in 12 (23.1%), 19 (38.0%), and 8 (14.8%) patients in the RFA, CI, and combined groups. Between-group differences were significant at 6 months (p < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CI and RFA are effective in recalcitrant PF, but their combination provides superior and more durable improvements in pain, function, and fascia morphology, with the lowest relapse rates. Ultrasound-guided combined therapy suggests a safe, practical, and effective treatment option for patients unresponsive to conservative measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Their Combination for Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Çile Aktan, Cemil Aktan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jfa2.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (PF) refers to persistent heel pain lasting ≥ 6 months despite appropriate conservative management, including physical therapy, orthotics, and pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injection (CI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and their combination in patients with recalcitrant PF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, a total of 156 patients with ultrasonographically confirmed plantar fasciitis, experiencing heel pain for at least 6 months and unresponsive to ≥ 3 months of standard conservative therapy, were included; 52 received RFA, 50 received CI, and 54 underwent combined therapy. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional status (Foot Function Index [FFI], Roles and Maudsley score [RMS]), plantar fascia thickness (PFT), and relapse rates at 12 months were assessed. Within-group and between-group differences were assessed using appropriate nonparametric tests, and relapse rates were compared accordingly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All treatment modalities improved VAS, FFI, RMS, and PFT at 6 months (p < 0.001). VAS declined from 6.73 to 6.81 at baseline to 1.62 in the RFA group and 1.83 in the combined group, whereas remaining at 6.56 in the CI group. FFI dropped from ∼52 to 21.50 and 17.57 in the RFA and combined groups but remained at 46.62 in the CI. PFT decreased from ∼6.2 mm to 3.29, 2.71, and 2.95 mm, respectively. Relapse occurred in 12 (23.1%), 19 (38.0%), and 8 (14.8%) patients in the RFA, CI, and combined groups. Between-group differences were significant at 6 months (p < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CI and RFA are effective in recalcitrant PF, but their combination provides superior and more durable improvements in pain, function, and fascia morphology, with the lowest relapse rates. Ultrasound-guided combined therapy suggests a safe, practical, and effective treatment option for patients unresponsive to conservative measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12411256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70080\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70080","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Their Combination for Recalcitrant Plantar Fasciitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background: Recalcitrant plantar fasciitis (PF) refers to persistent heel pain lasting ≥ 6 months despite appropriate conservative management, including physical therapy, orthotics, and pharmacological interventions. This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of corticosteroid injection (CI), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and their combination in patients with recalcitrant PF.
Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 156 patients with ultrasonographically confirmed plantar fasciitis, experiencing heel pain for at least 6 months and unresponsive to ≥ 3 months of standard conservative therapy, were included; 52 received RFA, 50 received CI, and 54 underwent combined therapy. Pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional status (Foot Function Index [FFI], Roles and Maudsley score [RMS]), plantar fascia thickness (PFT), and relapse rates at 12 months were assessed. Within-group and between-group differences were assessed using appropriate nonparametric tests, and relapse rates were compared accordingly.
Results: All treatment modalities improved VAS, FFI, RMS, and PFT at 6 months (p < 0.001). VAS declined from 6.73 to 6.81 at baseline to 1.62 in the RFA group and 1.83 in the combined group, whereas remaining at 6.56 in the CI group. FFI dropped from ∼52 to 21.50 and 17.57 in the RFA and combined groups but remained at 46.62 in the CI. PFT decreased from ∼6.2 mm to 3.29, 2.71, and 2.95 mm, respectively. Relapse occurred in 12 (23.1%), 19 (38.0%), and 8 (14.8%) patients in the RFA, CI, and combined groups. Between-group differences were significant at 6 months (p < 0.001). No major adverse events were observed.
Conclusion: Both CI and RFA are effective in recalcitrant PF, but their combination provides superior and more durable improvements in pain, function, and fascia morphology, with the lowest relapse rates. Ultrasound-guided combined therapy suggests a safe, practical, and effective treatment option for patients unresponsive to conservative measures.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders.
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care.
The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care.
The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.