孕妇口腔急症对症治疗的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yanjun Diao, Jinbiao Han, Yongle Shi, Xuan Xie, Yazhou He, Lin Xue, Xian Liu, Xuefeng Zhang
{"title":"孕妇口腔急症对症治疗的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Yanjun Diao, Jinbiao Han, Yongle Shi, Xuan Xie, Yazhou He, Lin Xue, Xian Liu, Xuefeng Zhang","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6546019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of symptomatic treatments - encompassing both active and conservative treatments - for oral emergencies during pregnancy on two key aspects: first, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes; second, the symptom relief rates of oral emergencies during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Pregnant women with oral emergencies(n=118) who visited the Emergency Department of West China Hospital of Stomatology of Sichuan University, from January 34 2024 to June 2024, were included in the study. These pregnant women received symptomatic treatment for their oral emergencies. The active treatment group (n=55) consisted of pregnant women who received invasive oral interventions, while the conservative treatment group (n=63) comprised those undergoing non-invasive interventions. Data encompassed pregnant women characteristics (age, educational attainment), clinical variables, diagnostic classifications, therapeutic interventions, symptom relief status (complete/partial/no relief) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study demonstrated that the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies during pregnancy was 4.24% (5/118). Although a significantly lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was observed in this study (4.24%) compared to the general population (p<0.001), the statistical power of this finding remains limited Following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies, 78.81% (93/118) of pregnant women achieved complete or partial relief. Specifically, 78.18% (43/55) in the active treatment group experienced complete symptom relief, compared with 17.46% (11/63) in the conservative treatment group, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, symptomatic treatment strategies (encompassing both active and conservative treatment) for oral emergencies during pregnancy were demonstrated to be safe and effective.Furthermore, active treatment demonstrated significant superiority over conservative treatment in achieving complete relief of symptoms for oral emergencies during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies in pregnant women: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yanjun Diao, Jinbiao Han, Yongle Shi, Xuan Xie, Yazhou He, Lin Xue, Xian Liu, Xuefeng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b6546019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of symptomatic treatments - encompassing both active and conservative treatments - for oral emergencies during pregnancy on two key aspects: first, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes; second, the symptom relief rates of oral emergencies during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Pregnant women with oral emergencies(n=118) who visited the Emergency Department of West China Hospital of Stomatology of Sichuan University, from January 34 2024 to June 2024, were included in the study. These pregnant women received symptomatic treatment for their oral emergencies. The active treatment group (n=55) consisted of pregnant women who received invasive oral interventions, while the conservative treatment group (n=63) comprised those undergoing non-invasive interventions. Data encompassed pregnant women characteristics (age, educational attainment), clinical variables, diagnostic classifications, therapeutic interventions, symptom relief status (complete/partial/no relief) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of this study demonstrated that the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies during pregnancy was 4.24% (5/118). Although a significantly lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was observed in this study (4.24%) compared to the general population (p<0.001), the statistical power of this finding remains limited Following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies, 78.81% (93/118) of pregnant women achieved complete or partial relief. Specifically, 78.18% (43/55) in the active treatment group experienced complete symptom relief, compared with 17.46% (11/63) in the conservative treatment group, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, symptomatic treatment strategies (encompassing both active and conservative treatment) for oral emergencies during pregnancy were demonstrated to be safe and effective.Furthermore, active treatment demonstrated significant superiority over conservative treatment in achieving complete relief of symptoms for oral emergencies during pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6546019\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6546019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是研究对症治疗的安全性和有效性,包括积极和保守治疗,在两个关键方面:第一,不良妊娠结局的发生率;二是妊娠期口腔急症的症状缓解率。方法与材料:选取于2024年1月34日至2024年6月在四川大学华西口腔医院急诊科就诊的口腔急诊孕妇118例为研究对象。这些孕妇因口腔急症而接受对症治疗。积极治疗组(n=55)为接受有创口腔干预的孕妇,保守治疗组(n=63)为接受无创口腔干预的孕妇。数据包括孕妇特征(年龄、受教育程度)、临床变量、诊断分类、治疗干预、症状缓解状态(完全/部分/无缓解)和不良妊娠结局。结果:本研究结果显示,妊娠期口腔急症对症治疗后不良妊娠结局发生率为4.24%(5/118)。尽管与一般人群相比,本研究中观察到的不良妊娠结局发生率明显较低(4.24%)(结论:在本研究的局限性内,对妊娠期间口腔紧急情况的对症治疗策略(包括积极和保守治疗)被证明是安全有效的。此外,积极治疗在完全缓解妊娠期口腔急症症状方面优于保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies in pregnant women: a retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of symptomatic treatments - encompassing both active and conservative treatments - for oral emergencies during pregnancy on two key aspects: first, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes; second, the symptom relief rates of oral emergencies during pregnancy.

Method and materials: Pregnant women with oral emergencies(n=118) who visited the Emergency Department of West China Hospital of Stomatology of Sichuan University, from January 34 2024 to June 2024, were included in the study. These pregnant women received symptomatic treatment for their oral emergencies. The active treatment group (n=55) consisted of pregnant women who received invasive oral interventions, while the conservative treatment group (n=63) comprised those undergoing non-invasive interventions. Data encompassed pregnant women characteristics (age, educational attainment), clinical variables, diagnostic classifications, therapeutic interventions, symptom relief status (complete/partial/no relief) and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Results: The results of this study demonstrated that the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies during pregnancy was 4.24% (5/118). Although a significantly lower incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was observed in this study (4.24%) compared to the general population (p<0.001), the statistical power of this finding remains limited Following symptomatic treatment for oral emergencies, 78.81% (93/118) of pregnant women achieved complete or partial relief. Specifically, 78.18% (43/55) in the active treatment group experienced complete symptom relief, compared with 17.46% (11/63) in the conservative treatment group, and this difference was statistically significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, symptomatic treatment strategies (encompassing both active and conservative treatment) for oral emergencies during pregnancy were demonstrated to be safe and effective.Furthermore, active treatment demonstrated significant superiority over conservative treatment in achieving complete relief of symptoms for oral emergencies during pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quintessence international
Quintessence international 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信