应用光子计数与能量积分检测器CT对儿童高音高心脏CTA的辐射剂量比较分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Gladys M Arguello Fletes, Wei Zhou, LaDonna J Malone, Andrea I Fuentealba Cargill, Jason P Weinman, Lorna P Browne
{"title":"应用光子计数与能量积分检测器CT对儿童高音高心脏CTA的辐射剂量比较分析。","authors":"Gladys M Arguello Fletes, Wei Zhou, LaDonna J Malone, Andrea I Fuentealba Cargill, Jason P Weinman, Lorna P Browne","doi":"10.1007/s00247-025-06336-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown improved image quality in pediatric cardiac imaging using photon-counting detector CT (PCDCT). However, these studies did not evaluate image quality and radiation dose when utilizing the full spectral capabilities of PCDCT scanners. The full spectral capability of PCDCT scanners allows the generation of the entire array of mono-energetic reconstructions, virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, and iodine maps, which have potential advantages in evaluating complex congenital heart disease. For example, following complex congenital cardiac repairs, when distinguishing intraluminal or soft tissue calcifications from contrast, or when evaluating intrastent thrombus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch cardiac CT using full spectral PCDCT and dual-source energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, IRB-approved study analyzed high-pitch cardiac CTs from January 2021 to October 2023 in pediatric patients (< 18 years). Patients were scanned using either PCDCT with full spectral technique (\"QuantumPlus\") or EIDCT. Radiation doses were measured by CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also calculated, and image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis included unpaired T-test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney test, and kappa coefficients for interrater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred patients were evaluated, with 100 scanned on PCDCT and 100 on EIDCT. In the PCDCT scanner, 47/100 (47%) were male and 53/100 were female (53%) (P = 0.01). In the EIDCT scanner, 65/100 were male (65%) and 35/100 (35%) were female (P = 0.01). In the PCDCT scanner, 68/100 (68%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 32/100 (32%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In the EIDCT, 80/100 (80%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 20/100 (20%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In patients ≤ 12 months, the CNR were 31.61 in the PCDCT group and 32.14 in the EIDCT group (P = 0.39). For those > 12 months, CNR were 30.07 for PCDCT and 25.27 for EIDCT (P = 0.17). In patients ≤ 12 months, SNR was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in PCDCT, compared to EIDCT for the teres minor muscles, while in patients > 12 months, SNR was not significantly lower (P = 0.89); SNR was similar between scanners. Radiation doses were significantly higher for PCDCT across both age groups (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-pitch cardiac CT with PCDCT using spectral processing resulted in higher radiation doses and lower SNR in infants compared to EIDCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative radiation dose analysis in pediatric high-pitch cardiac CTA using photon-counting versus energy-integrating detector CT.\",\"authors\":\"Gladys M Arguello Fletes, Wei Zhou, LaDonna J Malone, Andrea I Fuentealba Cargill, Jason P Weinman, Lorna P Browne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-025-06336-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown improved image quality in pediatric cardiac imaging using photon-counting detector CT (PCDCT). However, these studies did not evaluate image quality and radiation dose when utilizing the full spectral capabilities of PCDCT scanners. The full spectral capability of PCDCT scanners allows the generation of the entire array of mono-energetic reconstructions, virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, and iodine maps, which have potential advantages in evaluating complex congenital heart disease. For example, following complex congenital cardiac repairs, when distinguishing intraluminal or soft tissue calcifications from contrast, or when evaluating intrastent thrombus.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch cardiac CT using full spectral PCDCT and dual-source energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, IRB-approved study analyzed high-pitch cardiac CTs from January 2021 to October 2023 in pediatric patients (< 18 years). Patients were scanned using either PCDCT with full spectral technique (\\\"QuantumPlus\\\") or EIDCT. Radiation doses were measured by CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also calculated, and image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis included unpaired T-test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney test, and kappa coefficients for interrater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred patients were evaluated, with 100 scanned on PCDCT and 100 on EIDCT. In the PCDCT scanner, 47/100 (47%) were male and 53/100 were female (53%) (P = 0.01). In the EIDCT scanner, 65/100 were male (65%) and 35/100 (35%) were female (P = 0.01). In the PCDCT scanner, 68/100 (68%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 32/100 (32%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In the EIDCT, 80/100 (80%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 20/100 (20%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In patients ≤ 12 months, the CNR were 31.61 in the PCDCT group and 32.14 in the EIDCT group (P = 0.39). For those > 12 months, CNR were 30.07 for PCDCT and 25.27 for EIDCT (P = 0.17). In patients ≤ 12 months, SNR was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in PCDCT, compared to EIDCT for the teres minor muscles, while in patients > 12 months, SNR was not significantly lower (P = 0.89); SNR was similar between scanners. Radiation doses were significantly higher for PCDCT across both age groups (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-pitch cardiac CT with PCDCT using spectral processing resulted in higher radiation doses and lower SNR in infants compared to EIDCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06336-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06336-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往的研究表明,使用光子计数检测器CT (PCDCT)可以提高儿童心脏成像的图像质量。然而,当利用PCDCT扫描仪的全光谱能力时,这些研究没有评估图像质量和辐射剂量。PCDCT扫描仪的全光谱能力允许生成整个单能量重建阵列,虚拟非对比(VNC)图像和碘图,这在评估复杂的先天性心脏病方面具有潜在的优势。例如,在复杂的先天性心脏修复后,在区分腔内或软组织钙化与造影剂时,或在评估血管内血栓时。目的:比较全谱PCDCT与双源能量积分检测器CT (EIDCT)高间距心脏CT的图像质量和辐射剂量。材料和方法:这项经irb批准的回顾性研究分析了2021年1月至2023年10月儿科患者的高音高心脏ct(结果:评估了200例患者,其中100例进行了PCDCT扫描,100例进行了EIDCT扫描。PCDCT扫描中男性占47/100(47%),女性占53/100 (53%)(P = 0.01)。在EIDCT扫描中,男性65/100(65%),女性35/100 (35%)(P = 0.01)。在PCDCT扫描中,68/100(68%)≤12个月(P = 0.05), 32/100(32%)≤12个月(P = 0.05)。EIDCT, 80/100 (80%) (P = 0.05)≤12个月,20/100 (20%)(P = 0.05) > 12个月。在≤12个月的患者中,PCDCT组的CNR为31.61,EIDCT组为32.14 (P = 0.39)。PCDCT组CNR为30.07,EIDCT组CNR为25.27 (P = 0.17)。≤12个月的患者,信噪比显著降低(P≤12个月,信噪比无显著降低(P = 0.89);不同扫描器的信噪比相似。结论:与EIDCT相比,使用频谱处理的高音高心脏CT与PCDCT相比,婴儿的辐射剂量更高,信噪比更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative radiation dose analysis in pediatric high-pitch cardiac CTA using photon-counting versus energy-integrating detector CT.

Background: Previous studies have shown improved image quality in pediatric cardiac imaging using photon-counting detector CT (PCDCT). However, these studies did not evaluate image quality and radiation dose when utilizing the full spectral capabilities of PCDCT scanners. The full spectral capability of PCDCT scanners allows the generation of the entire array of mono-energetic reconstructions, virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, and iodine maps, which have potential advantages in evaluating complex congenital heart disease. For example, following complex congenital cardiac repairs, when distinguishing intraluminal or soft tissue calcifications from contrast, or when evaluating intrastent thrombus.

Objective: To compare image quality and radiation dose between high-pitch cardiac CT using full spectral PCDCT and dual-source energy-integrating detector CT (EIDCT).

Materials and methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study analyzed high-pitch cardiac CTs from January 2021 to October 2023 in pediatric patients (< 18 years). Patients were scanned using either PCDCT with full spectral technique ("QuantumPlus") or EIDCT. Radiation doses were measured by CT dose index (CTDI) and dose-length product (DLP). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also calculated, and image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis included unpaired T-test, Shapiro-Wilk test, Mann-Whitney test, and kappa coefficients for interrater agreement.

Results: Two hundred patients were evaluated, with 100 scanned on PCDCT and 100 on EIDCT. In the PCDCT scanner, 47/100 (47%) were male and 53/100 were female (53%) (P = 0.01). In the EIDCT scanner, 65/100 were male (65%) and 35/100 (35%) were female (P = 0.01). In the PCDCT scanner, 68/100 (68%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 32/100 (32%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In the EIDCT, 80/100 (80%) (P = 0.05) were ≤ 12 months, and 20/100 (20%) (P = 0.05) were > 12 months. In patients ≤ 12 months, the CNR were 31.61 in the PCDCT group and 32.14 in the EIDCT group (P = 0.39). For those > 12 months, CNR were 30.07 for PCDCT and 25.27 for EIDCT (P = 0.17). In patients ≤ 12 months, SNR was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) in PCDCT, compared to EIDCT for the teres minor muscles, while in patients > 12 months, SNR was not significantly lower (P = 0.89); SNR was similar between scanners. Radiation doses were significantly higher for PCDCT across both age groups (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: High-pitch cardiac CT with PCDCT using spectral processing resulted in higher radiation doses and lower SNR in infants compared to EIDCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信