Polina Shabes, Waseem Garabet, Sven Tilhein, Hubert Schelzig, Julian-Dario Rembe
{"title":"局部干燥剂化学清创期间的疼痛感知和处理:一个病例系列分析。","authors":"Polina Shabes, Waseem Garabet, Sven Tilhein, Hubert Schelzig, Julian-Dario Rembe","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2025.0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A new topical desiccating agent (TDA; DEBRICHEM, DEBx Medical BV, the Netherlands) based on methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has proved to be an effective biofilm- and necrosis-removing chemical debridement option. However, its application can be temporarily accompanied by sharp pain perception, depending on the individual patient. This study aimed to assess application-associated pain and two strategies to manage this.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centre, retrospective, case-series study design was used to assess pain associated with MSA/DMSO treatment. To lower pain sensation during the application, two different local anaesthetic procedures were applied using either an anaesthetic cream or a form of tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) before, during and at five minutes after treatment. Overall wound pain, pain during dressing change in general and during the last change, as well as during the last sharp debridement were assessed. Additionally, baseline pain medication, medication during treatment and local anaesthetic management before MSA/DMSO application were recorded. Patients with peripheral neuropathy were excluded from the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients treated with TDA were identified. Application lasted 20 minutes before treatment. Chemical debridement was associated with individual pain during application (VAS range 0-10). However, using adequate management, pain could be effectively reduced with no significant difference between pain ratings for TDA and the usually applied sharp debridement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accompanying pain during (chemical) TDA debridement was well managed using ready-to-use anaesthetic approaches. It demonstrated no increased overall pain perception compared with sharp debridement and, in some individual cases, even lower pain ratings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 9","pages":"747-752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain perception and management during chemical debridement with a topical desiccating agent: a case-series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Polina Shabes, Waseem Garabet, Sven Tilhein, Hubert Schelzig, Julian-Dario Rembe\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2025.0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A new topical desiccating agent (TDA; DEBRICHEM, DEBx Medical BV, the Netherlands) based on methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has proved to be an effective biofilm- and necrosis-removing chemical debridement option. However, its application can be temporarily accompanied by sharp pain perception, depending on the individual patient. This study aimed to assess application-associated pain and two strategies to manage this.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A single-centre, retrospective, case-series study design was used to assess pain associated with MSA/DMSO treatment. To lower pain sensation during the application, two different local anaesthetic procedures were applied using either an anaesthetic cream or a form of tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) before, during and at five minutes after treatment. Overall wound pain, pain during dressing change in general and during the last change, as well as during the last sharp debridement were assessed. Additionally, baseline pain medication, medication during treatment and local anaesthetic management before MSA/DMSO application were recorded. Patients with peripheral neuropathy were excluded from the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients treated with TDA were identified. Application lasted 20 minutes before treatment. Chemical debridement was associated with individual pain during application (VAS range 0-10). However, using adequate management, pain could be effectively reduced with no significant difference between pain ratings for TDA and the usually applied sharp debridement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accompanying pain during (chemical) TDA debridement was well managed using ready-to-use anaesthetic approaches. It demonstrated no increased overall pain perception compared with sharp debridement and, in some individual cases, even lower pain ratings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"747-752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:一种基于甲磺酸(MSA)和二甲基亚砜(DMSO)的新型局部干燥剂(TDA; DEBRICHEM, DEBx Medical BV,荷兰)已被证明是一种有效的生物膜和坏死清除化学清创选择。然而,它的应用可以暂时伴随着尖锐的疼痛感,这取决于个体患者。本研究旨在评估应用相关的疼痛和两种策略来管理它。方法:采用单中心、回顾性、病例系列研究设计来评估与MSA/DMSO治疗相关的疼痛。为了在应用过程中降低疼痛感,采用两种不同的局部麻醉程序,使用麻醉膏或肿胀局部麻醉(TLA)。在治疗前、治疗中和治疗后5分钟,采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)对疼痛进行评估。评估了总体伤口疼痛、换药时的疼痛、换药时的疼痛、最后一次换药时的疼痛以及最后一次急剧清创时的疼痛。此外,记录基线疼痛用药、治疗期间用药和应用MSA/DMSO前的局麻管理情况。周围神经病变患者被排除在分析之外。结果:共有20例患者接受TDA治疗。敷药时间为20分钟。化学清创与应用期间个体疼痛相关(VAS范围0-10)。然而,通过适当的管理,疼痛可以有效地减轻,TDA和通常应用的尖锐清创的疼痛等级之间没有显着差异。结论:化学TDA清创过程中伴随的疼痛采用即用麻醉方法处理得很好。与急剧清创相比,它没有增加整体疼痛感,在某些个别情况下,甚至更低的疼痛评分。
Pain perception and management during chemical debridement with a topical desiccating agent: a case-series analysis.
Objective: A new topical desiccating agent (TDA; DEBRICHEM, DEBx Medical BV, the Netherlands) based on methanesulfonic acid (MSA) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has proved to be an effective biofilm- and necrosis-removing chemical debridement option. However, its application can be temporarily accompanied by sharp pain perception, depending on the individual patient. This study aimed to assess application-associated pain and two strategies to manage this.
Method: A single-centre, retrospective, case-series study design was used to assess pain associated with MSA/DMSO treatment. To lower pain sensation during the application, two different local anaesthetic procedures were applied using either an anaesthetic cream or a form of tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) before, during and at five minutes after treatment. Overall wound pain, pain during dressing change in general and during the last change, as well as during the last sharp debridement were assessed. Additionally, baseline pain medication, medication during treatment and local anaesthetic management before MSA/DMSO application were recorded. Patients with peripheral neuropathy were excluded from the analyses.
Results: A total of 20 patients treated with TDA were identified. Application lasted 20 minutes before treatment. Chemical debridement was associated with individual pain during application (VAS range 0-10). However, using adequate management, pain could be effectively reduced with no significant difference between pain ratings for TDA and the usually applied sharp debridement.
Conclusion: Accompanying pain during (chemical) TDA debridement was well managed using ready-to-use anaesthetic approaches. It demonstrated no increased overall pain perception compared with sharp debridement and, in some individual cases, even lower pain ratings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.