人羊膜异体移植治疗糖尿病足溃疡和静脉足溃疡的回顾性评价。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
David Kay, Marta Sandres-Corwin, Michael Bayever, Harry H Matundan
{"title":"人羊膜异体移植治疗糖尿病足溃疡和静脉足溃疡的回顾性评价。","authors":"David Kay, Marta Sandres-Corwin, Michael Bayever, Harry H Matundan","doi":"10.7547/24-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of wound care algorithms for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs) treated by a mobile wound clinic. Most patients requiring home treatment performed worse with the standard of care (SOC) compared to those in traditional outpatient clinics, especially chronic wounds associated with multiple comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on one year's data from patient records of a mobile wound clinic (July 2022 - June 2023) involving patients suffering from DFU and VLU. Patients were divided into a control group receiving SOC with debridement and a group receiving SOC plus placental-based tissue grafts. The wound area and depth were assessed weekly. The SOC plus grafting group was monitored for the duration and number of graft applications per wound. Wounds were also scored for granulation-epithelialization (G+E) and eschar-slough (E+S). Statistical analysis included paired t-tests and ANOVA for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the interventional group, the average reduction in wound area was 39%, compared to a 10% reduction in the SOC with debridement cohort (p < 0.05). The average wound depth decreased by 33% in the interventional group and by 2% in the SOC with debridement cohort (p<0.05). The interventional group improved their positive wound scores by 8% (G+E), while negative wound scores decreased by 55% (E+S) compared to SOC with debridement patients. The mean grafting period was 94 days (±10 days) per patient, with a mean of 15 grafts (±2.6) applied per wound.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite severe comorbidities, we observed improved wound healing in a home-based care setting for most DFU and VLU patients who underwent SOC with debridement and grafting compared to SOC with debridement alone. Patients receiving SOC alone showed poorer performance at home compared to those receiving SOC plus grafting, consistently showing improvement over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Evaluation of Human Amniotic Allografts for Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers Treated by an In-Home Mobile Wound Clinic.\",\"authors\":\"David Kay, Marta Sandres-Corwin, Michael Bayever, Harry H Matundan\",\"doi\":\"10.7547/24-210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective is to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of wound care algorithms for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs) treated by a mobile wound clinic. Most patients requiring home treatment performed worse with the standard of care (SOC) compared to those in traditional outpatient clinics, especially chronic wounds associated with multiple comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on one year's data from patient records of a mobile wound clinic (July 2022 - June 2023) involving patients suffering from DFU and VLU. Patients were divided into a control group receiving SOC with debridement and a group receiving SOC plus placental-based tissue grafts. The wound area and depth were assessed weekly. The SOC plus grafting group was monitored for the duration and number of graft applications per wound. Wounds were also scored for granulation-epithelialization (G+E) and eschar-slough (E+S). Statistical analysis included paired t-tests and ANOVA for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the interventional group, the average reduction in wound area was 39%, compared to a 10% reduction in the SOC with debridement cohort (p < 0.05). The average wound depth decreased by 33% in the interventional group and by 2% in the SOC with debridement cohort (p<0.05). The interventional group improved their positive wound scores by 8% (G+E), while negative wound scores decreased by 55% (E+S) compared to SOC with debridement patients. The mean grafting period was 94 days (±10 days) per patient, with a mean of 15 grafts (±2.6) applied per wound.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite severe comorbidities, we observed improved wound healing in a home-based care setting for most DFU and VLU patients who underwent SOC with debridement and grafting compared to SOC with debridement alone. Patients receiving SOC alone showed poorer performance at home compared to those receiving SOC plus grafting, consistently showing improvement over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/24-210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的是评估由流动伤口诊所治疗的糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)和静脉性腿溃疡(VLUs)的伤口护理算法的疗效差异。与传统门诊相比,大多数需要家庭治疗的患者在标准护理(SOC)方面的表现更差,特别是与多种合并症相关的慢性伤口。方法:回顾性分析某流动伤口诊所(2022年7月- 2023年6月)一年内DFU和VLU患者的病历资料。患者被分为对照组和对照组,前者接受SOC并清创,后者接受SOC加胎盘组织移植。每周评估伤口面积和深度。监测SOC +移植组的持续时间和每个创面的移植次数。同时对伤口进行肉芽上皮化(G+E)和痂皮(E+S)评分。统计分析采用配对t检验和方差分析进行多重比较。结果:介入组创面面积平均减少39%,而清创组创面面积平均减少10% (p < 0.05)。结论:尽管存在严重的合并症,但我们观察到,在家庭护理环境中,大多数DFU和VLU患者接受SOC联合清创和移植的伤口愈合情况比单独清创的SOC有所改善。与接受SOC +移植的患者相比,单独接受SOC的患者在家中表现较差,但随着时间的推移持续表现出改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Evaluation of Human Amniotic Allografts for Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Venous Leg Ulcers Treated by an In-Home Mobile Wound Clinic.

Background: The objective is to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of wound care algorithms for diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and venous leg ulcers (VLUs) treated by a mobile wound clinic. Most patients requiring home treatment performed worse with the standard of care (SOC) compared to those in traditional outpatient clinics, especially chronic wounds associated with multiple comorbidities.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on one year's data from patient records of a mobile wound clinic (July 2022 - June 2023) involving patients suffering from DFU and VLU. Patients were divided into a control group receiving SOC with debridement and a group receiving SOC plus placental-based tissue grafts. The wound area and depth were assessed weekly. The SOC plus grafting group was monitored for the duration and number of graft applications per wound. Wounds were also scored for granulation-epithelialization (G+E) and eschar-slough (E+S). Statistical analysis included paired t-tests and ANOVA for multiple comparisons.

Results: In the interventional group, the average reduction in wound area was 39%, compared to a 10% reduction in the SOC with debridement cohort (p < 0.05). The average wound depth decreased by 33% in the interventional group and by 2% in the SOC with debridement cohort (p<0.05). The interventional group improved their positive wound scores by 8% (G+E), while negative wound scores decreased by 55% (E+S) compared to SOC with debridement patients. The mean grafting period was 94 days (±10 days) per patient, with a mean of 15 grafts (±2.6) applied per wound.

Conclusion: Despite severe comorbidities, we observed improved wound healing in a home-based care setting for most DFU and VLU patients who underwent SOC with debridement and grafting compared to SOC with debridement alone. Patients receiving SOC alone showed poorer performance at home compared to those receiving SOC plus grafting, consistently showing improvement over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信