目标试验模拟复制随机临床试验使用注册数据在多发性硬化症。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Antoine Gavoille, Mikail Nourredine, Fabien Rollot, Romain Casey, Guillaume Mathey, Anne Kerbrat, Jonathan Ciron, Jérôme De Sèze, Bruno Stankoff, Elisabeth Maillart, Aurelie Ruet, Pierre Labauge, Arnaud Kwiatkowski, Helene Zephir, Caroline Papeix, Gilles Defer, Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Thibault Moreau, David-Axel Laplaud, Eric Berger, Pierre Clavelou, Eric Thouvenot, Olivier Heinzlef, Jean Pelletier, Abdullatif Al Khedr, Olivier Casez, Bertrand Bourre, Abir Wahab, Laurent Magy, Solène Moulin, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché, Ines Doghri, Mariana Sarov, Karolina Hankiewicz, Corinne Pottier, Amélie Dos Santos, Eric Manchon, Maia Tchikviladze, Muriel Rabilloud, Fabien Subtil, Sandra Vukusic
{"title":"目标试验模拟复制随机临床试验使用注册数据在多发性硬化症。","authors":"Antoine Gavoille, Mikail Nourredine, Fabien Rollot, Romain Casey, Guillaume Mathey, Anne Kerbrat, Jonathan Ciron, Jérôme De Sèze, Bruno Stankoff, Elisabeth Maillart, Aurelie Ruet, Pierre Labauge, Arnaud Kwiatkowski, Helene Zephir, Caroline Papeix, Gilles Defer, Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Thibault Moreau, David-Axel Laplaud, Eric Berger, Pierre Clavelou, Eric Thouvenot, Olivier Heinzlef, Jean Pelletier, Abdullatif Al Khedr, Olivier Casez, Bertrand Bourre, Abir Wahab, Laurent Magy, Solène Moulin, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché, Ines Doghri, Mariana Sarov, Karolina Hankiewicz, Corinne Pottier, Amélie Dos Santos, Eric Manchon, Maia Tchikviladze, Muriel Rabilloud, Fabien Subtil, Sandra Vukusic","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-336762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTarget trial emulation (TTE) offers a formal framework for causal inference using observational data, but its validity must be evaluated in each research domain by replicating randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to replicate eight RCTs evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using French registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted using data extracted in December 2023 from the <i>Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques</i> (OFSEP) database. For each emulated trial, patients were included when they initiated one of the DMT evaluated in the corresponding RCT and met its inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were the annualised relapse rate and 3-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression. Radiological outcomes were new/enlarged T2-lesions and new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions on a brain MRI. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the treatment effect adjusted for confounding factors between groups and corrected for censoring and missing outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 111 patients were included in eight emulated trials: ASSESS (fingolimod vs glatiramer acetate), BEYOND (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), CONFIRM (dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs glatiramer acetate), OPERA (ocrelizumab vs interferon beta), REGARD (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), RIFUND-MS (rituximab vs DMF), TENERE (teriflunomide vs interferon beta) and TRANSFORMS (fingolimod vs interferon beta). Treatment effects estimated in emulated trials were concordant with RCT findings in seven of eight trials for relapse rate, and in all six trials assessing disability progression. Radiological outcomes were more challenging to replicate; concordance was achieved in three of five trials for new T2-lesions, and one of four trials for new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined use of a TTE methodology and high-quality registry data is a valid tool to evaluate treatment effectiveness in MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target trial emulation to replicate randomised clinical trials using registry data in multiple sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Antoine Gavoille, Mikail Nourredine, Fabien Rollot, Romain Casey, Guillaume Mathey, Anne Kerbrat, Jonathan Ciron, Jérôme De Sèze, Bruno Stankoff, Elisabeth Maillart, Aurelie Ruet, Pierre Labauge, Arnaud Kwiatkowski, Helene Zephir, Caroline Papeix, Gilles Defer, Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Thibault Moreau, David-Axel Laplaud, Eric Berger, Pierre Clavelou, Eric Thouvenot, Olivier Heinzlef, Jean Pelletier, Abdullatif Al Khedr, Olivier Casez, Bertrand Bourre, Abir Wahab, Laurent Magy, Solène Moulin, Jean-Philippe Camdessanché, Ines Doghri, Mariana Sarov, Karolina Hankiewicz, Corinne Pottier, Amélie Dos Santos, Eric Manchon, Maia Tchikviladze, Muriel Rabilloud, Fabien Subtil, Sandra Vukusic\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2025-336762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundTarget trial emulation (TTE) offers a formal framework for causal inference using observational data, but its validity must be evaluated in each research domain by replicating randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to replicate eight RCTs evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using French registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted using data extracted in December 2023 from the <i>Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques</i> (OFSEP) database. For each emulated trial, patients were included when they initiated one of the DMT evaluated in the corresponding RCT and met its inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were the annualised relapse rate and 3-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression. Radiological outcomes were new/enlarged T2-lesions and new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions on a brain MRI. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the treatment effect adjusted for confounding factors between groups and corrected for censoring and missing outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 111 patients were included in eight emulated trials: ASSESS (fingolimod vs glatiramer acetate), BEYOND (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), CONFIRM (dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs glatiramer acetate), OPERA (ocrelizumab vs interferon beta), REGARD (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), RIFUND-MS (rituximab vs DMF), TENERE (teriflunomide vs interferon beta) and TRANSFORMS (fingolimod vs interferon beta). Treatment effects estimated in emulated trials were concordant with RCT findings in seven of eight trials for relapse rate, and in all six trials assessing disability progression. Radiological outcomes were more challenging to replicate; concordance was achieved in three of five trials for new T2-lesions, and one of four trials for new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined use of a TTE methodology and high-quality registry data is a valid tool to evaluate treatment effectiveness in MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-336762\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-336762","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标试验模拟(TTE)为使用观察数据进行因果推理提供了一个正式的框架,但其有效性必须通过重复随机临床试验(RCTs)在每个研究领域进行评估。我们的目的是重复8项随机对照试验,使用法国注册数据评估多发性硬化症(MS)疾病改善疗法(dmt)的疗效。方法:这项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究使用的数据于2023年12月从法国医学观察中心(OFSEP)数据库中提取。对于每个模拟试验,当患者启动相应RCT中评估的DMT之一并符合其纳入标准时,患者被纳入。临床结果是年复发率和3个月确认的扩展残疾状态量表进展。影像学结果为脑MRI上新的/扩大的t2病变和新的钆增强的t1病变。使用目标最大似然估计器来估计治疗效果,对组间混杂因素进行调整,并对审查和缺失的结果评估进行校正。结果:14 111例患者被纳入8项模拟试验:评估(芬戈莫德vs醋酸格拉替雷默)、BEYOND(干扰素β vs醋酸格拉替雷默)、CONFIRM(富马酸二甲酯(DMF) vs醋酸格拉替雷默)、OPERA(奥克雷单抗vs β干扰素)、REGARD (β干扰素vs醋酸格拉替雷默)、rifundm(利妥昔单抗vs DMF)、TENERE(特氟米特vs β干扰素)和TRANSFORMS(芬戈莫德vs β干扰素)。模拟试验中估计的治疗效果与8项复发率试验中的7项和所有6项评估残疾进展的试验中的RCT结果一致。影像学结果更难以复制;新发t2病变的5项试验中有3项达到了一致性,新发钆增强t1病变的4项试验中有1项达到了一致性。结论:结合TTE方法和高质量的注册数据是评估多发性硬化症治疗效果的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Target trial emulation to replicate randomised clinical trials using registry data in multiple sclerosis.

BackgroundTarget trial emulation (TTE) offers a formal framework for causal inference using observational data, but its validity must be evaluated in each research domain by replicating randomised clinical trials (RCTs). We aimed to replicate eight RCTs evaluating the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) using French registry data.

Methods: This multicentre, retrospective, observational study was conducted using data extracted in December 2023 from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP) database. For each emulated trial, patients were included when they initiated one of the DMT evaluated in the corresponding RCT and met its inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were the annualised relapse rate and 3-month confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale progression. Radiological outcomes were new/enlarged T2-lesions and new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions on a brain MRI. A targeted maximum likelihood estimator was used to estimate the treatment effect adjusted for confounding factors between groups and corrected for censoring and missing outcome assessment.

Results: 14 111 patients were included in eight emulated trials: ASSESS (fingolimod vs glatiramer acetate), BEYOND (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), CONFIRM (dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs glatiramer acetate), OPERA (ocrelizumab vs interferon beta), REGARD (interferon beta vs glatiramer acetate), RIFUND-MS (rituximab vs DMF), TENERE (teriflunomide vs interferon beta) and TRANSFORMS (fingolimod vs interferon beta). Treatment effects estimated in emulated trials were concordant with RCT findings in seven of eight trials for relapse rate, and in all six trials assessing disability progression. Radiological outcomes were more challenging to replicate; concordance was achieved in three of five trials for new T2-lesions, and one of four trials for new gadolinium-enhanced T1-lesions.

Conclusion: The combined use of a TTE methodology and high-quality registry data is a valid tool to evaluate treatment effectiveness in MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信