使用可解释的表格先前数据拟合的基于网络的MRI放射组学模型评估前列腺癌的前列腺外展。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Bai-Chuan Liu, Xiao-Hui Ding, Hong-Hao Xu, Xu Bai, Xiao-Jing Zhang, Meng-Qiu Cui, Ai-Tao Guo, Xue-Tao Mu, Li-Zhi Xie, Huan-Huan Kang, Shao-Peng Zhou, Jian Zhao, Bao-Jun Wang, Hai-Yi Wang
{"title":"使用可解释的表格先前数据拟合的基于网络的MRI放射组学模型评估前列腺癌的前列腺外展。","authors":"Bai-Chuan Liu, Xiao-Hui Ding, Hong-Hao Xu, Xu Bai, Xiao-Jing Zhang, Meng-Qiu Cui, Ai-Tao Guo, Xue-Tao Mu, Li-Zhi Xie, Huan-Huan Kang, Shao-Peng Zhou, Jian Zhao, Bao-Jun Wang, Hai-Yi Wang","doi":"10.1002/jmri.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI assessment for extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa) is challenging due to limited accuracy and interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop an interpretable Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN)-based radiomics model to evaluate EPE using MRI and explore its integration with radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Five hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Four hundred and eleven patients from center 1 (mean age 67 ± 7 years) formed training (287 patients) and internal test (124 patients) sets, and 102 patients from center 2 (mean age 66 ± 6 years) were assigned as an external test set.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>Three Tesla, fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging using single-shot echo planar imaging.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Radiomics features were extracted from T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and the TabRadiomics model was developed using TabPFN. Three machine learning models served as baseline comparisons: support vector machine, random forest, and categorical boosting. Two radiologists (with > 1500 and > 500 prostate MRI interpretations, respectively) independently evaluated EPE grade on MRI. Artificial intelligence (AI)-modified EPE grading algorithms incorporating the TabRadiomics model with radiologists' interpretations of curvilinear contact length and frank EPE were simulated.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Delong test, and McNemar test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TabRadiomics model performed comparably to machine learning models in both internal and external tests, with AUCs of 0.806 (95% CI, 0.727-0.884) and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.770-0.912), respectively. AI-modified algorithms showed significantly higher accuracies compared with the less experienced reader in internal testing, with up to 34.7% of interpretations requiring no radiologist input. However, no difference was observed in both readers in the external test set.</p><p><strong>Data conclusions: </strong>The TabRadiomics model demonstrated high performance in EPE assessment and may improve clinical assessment in PCa.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative Assessment of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Using an Interpretable Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network-Based Radiomics Model From MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Bai-Chuan Liu, Xiao-Hui Ding, Hong-Hao Xu, Xu Bai, Xiao-Jing Zhang, Meng-Qiu Cui, Ai-Tao Guo, Xue-Tao Mu, Li-Zhi Xie, Huan-Huan Kang, Shao-Peng Zhou, Jian Zhao, Bao-Jun Wang, Hai-Yi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.70111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MRI assessment for extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa) is challenging due to limited accuracy and interobserver agreement.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop an interpretable Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN)-based radiomics model to evaluate EPE using MRI and explore its integration with radiologists' assessments.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Five hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Four hundred and eleven patients from center 1 (mean age 67 ± 7 years) formed training (287 patients) and internal test (124 patients) sets, and 102 patients from center 2 (mean age 66 ± 6 years) were assigned as an external test set.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>Three Tesla, fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging using single-shot echo planar imaging.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>Radiomics features were extracted from T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and the TabRadiomics model was developed using TabPFN. Three machine learning models served as baseline comparisons: support vector machine, random forest, and categorical boosting. Two radiologists (with > 1500 and > 500 prostate MRI interpretations, respectively) independently evaluated EPE grade on MRI. Artificial intelligence (AI)-modified EPE grading algorithms incorporating the TabRadiomics model with radiologists' interpretations of curvilinear contact length and frank EPE were simulated.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Delong test, and McNemar test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TabRadiomics model performed comparably to machine learning models in both internal and external tests, with AUCs of 0.806 (95% CI, 0.727-0.884) and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.770-0.912), respectively. AI-modified algorithms showed significantly higher accuracies compared with the less experienced reader in internal testing, with up to 34.7% of interpretations requiring no radiologist input. However, no difference was observed in both readers in the external test set.</p><p><strong>Data conclusions: </strong>The TabRadiomics model demonstrated high performance in EPE assessment and may improve clinical assessment in PCa.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>4.</p><p><strong>Technical efficacy: </strong>Stage 2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.70111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前列腺癌(PCa)的前列腺外展(EPE)的MRI评估由于有限的准确性和观察者之间的一致性而具有挑战性。目的:建立一个可解释的基于TabPFN的放射组学模型,用于MRI评估EPE,并探讨其与放射科医生评估的整合。研究类型:回顾性。人群:513例连续接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者。来自中心1的111例患者(平均年龄67±7岁)组成训练组(287例)和内部测试组(124例),来自中心2的102例患者(平均年龄66±6岁)被分配为外部测试组。场强/序列:三特斯拉,快速自旋回波t2加权成像(T2WI)和单次回波平面成像扩散加权成像。评估:从T2WI和表观扩散系数图中提取放射组学特征,并使用TabPFN建立TabRadiomics模型。三种机器学习模型作为基线比较:支持向量机、随机森林和分类增强。两名放射科医生(分别有>500和bbb500前列腺MRI解释)独立评估MRI上的EPE分级。将TabRadiomics模型与放射科医生对曲线接触长度和坦率EPE的解释相结合的人工智能(AI)改进的EPE分级算法进行了模拟。统计学检验:受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)、Delong检验、McNemar检验。结果:TabRadiomics模型在内部和外部测试中的表现与机器学习模型相当,auc分别为0.806 (95% CI, 0.727-0.884)和0.842 (95% CI, 0.770-0.912)。在内部测试中,与经验不足的读者相比,人工智能修改的算法显示出更高的准确性,高达34.7%的解读不需要放射科医生的输入。然而,在外部测试集中,两种阅读器没有观察到差异。数据结论:TabRadiomics模型在EPE评估中表现出高性能,并可能改善PCa的临床评估。证据等级:4。技术功效:第二阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative Assessment of Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer Using an Interpretable Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Network-Based Radiomics Model From MRI.

Background: MRI assessment for extraprostatic extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa) is challenging due to limited accuracy and interobserver agreement.

Purpose: To develop an interpretable Tabular Prior-data Fitted Network (TabPFN)-based radiomics model to evaluate EPE using MRI and explore its integration with radiologists' assessments.

Study type: Retrospective.

Population: Five hundred and thirteen consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Four hundred and eleven patients from center 1 (mean age 67 ± 7 years) formed training (287 patients) and internal test (124 patients) sets, and 102 patients from center 2 (mean age 66 ± 6 years) were assigned as an external test set.

Field strength/sequence: Three Tesla, fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging using single-shot echo planar imaging.

Assessment: Radiomics features were extracted from T2WI and apparent diffusion coefficient maps, and the TabRadiomics model was developed using TabPFN. Three machine learning models served as baseline comparisons: support vector machine, random forest, and categorical boosting. Two radiologists (with > 1500 and > 500 prostate MRI interpretations, respectively) independently evaluated EPE grade on MRI. Artificial intelligence (AI)-modified EPE grading algorithms incorporating the TabRadiomics model with radiologists' interpretations of curvilinear contact length and frank EPE were simulated.

Statistical tests: Receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Delong test, and McNemar test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: The TabRadiomics model performed comparably to machine learning models in both internal and external tests, with AUCs of 0.806 (95% CI, 0.727-0.884) and 0.842 (95% CI, 0.770-0.912), respectively. AI-modified algorithms showed significantly higher accuracies compared with the less experienced reader in internal testing, with up to 34.7% of interpretations requiring no radiologist input. However, no difference was observed in both readers in the external test set.

Data conclusions: The TabRadiomics model demonstrated high performance in EPE assessment and may improve clinical assessment in PCa.

Evidence level: 4.

Technical efficacy: Stage 2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信