Cailing Ye, Yaqiong Chen, Jiahao Chen, Zhongcheng Chen, Wensi Chen, Suqing Zhao, Bo Hu, Zhaoxia Li
{"title":"一种新的肝细胞癌经动脉化疗栓塞模型的预后价值。","authors":"Cailing Ye, Yaqiong Chen, Jiahao Chen, Zhongcheng Chen, Wensi Chen, Suqing Zhao, Bo Hu, Zhaoxia Li","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Accurate prognosis prediction and risk stratification are crucial for individualized treatment. We sought to develop a novel prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary clinical and laboratory factors for estimating individual prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 180 HCC patients treated with TACE were used to identify the risk factors and generate prognostic models by Cox regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated by comparing it with the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) and Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A prognosis model (PI score), which consisted of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and TNM stage, was constructed. The PI scores of each patient were calculated, and the patients were divided into subgroups based on their PI scores. The OS rate of patients in the low-risk group (PI < 0.87) was better than that of the patients in the high-risk group (PI ≥ 0.87), <i>p</i> < 0.001. Patients were then further divided into four stages: early stage (PI ≤ 0.49), middle stage (0.49 < PI ≤ 0.87), advanced stage (0.87 < PI ≤ 1.48), and end stage (PI > 1.48). There were statistically significant differences between the OS rates of the four groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for PI score (0.746, 0.643–0.783) was higher than those of TNM (0.699, 0.620–0.763) and BCLC (0.692, 0.617–0.760).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The PI score had excellent predictive value for HCC patients undergoing TACE and was superior to TNM and BCLC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":"39 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Value of a Novel Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization\",\"authors\":\"Cailing Ye, Yaqiong Chen, Jiahao Chen, Zhongcheng Chen, Wensi Chen, Suqing Zhao, Bo Hu, Zhaoxia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcla.70095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Accurate prognosis prediction and risk stratification are crucial for individualized treatment. We sought to develop a novel prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary clinical and laboratory factors for estimating individual prognosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 180 HCC patients treated with TACE were used to identify the risk factors and generate prognostic models by Cox regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated by comparing it with the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) and Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prognosis model (PI score), which consisted of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and TNM stage, was constructed. The PI scores of each patient were calculated, and the patients were divided into subgroups based on their PI scores. The OS rate of patients in the low-risk group (PI < 0.87) was better than that of the patients in the high-risk group (PI ≥ 0.87), <i>p</i> < 0.001. Patients were then further divided into four stages: early stage (PI ≤ 0.49), middle stage (0.49 < PI ≤ 0.87), advanced stage (0.87 < PI ≤ 1.48), and end stage (PI > 1.48). There were statistically significant differences between the OS rates of the four groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for PI score (0.746, 0.643–0.783) was higher than those of TNM (0.699, 0.620–0.763) and BCLC (0.692, 0.617–0.760).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The PI score had excellent predictive value for HCC patients undergoing TACE and was superior to TNM and BCLC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"volume\":\"39 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcla.70095\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.70095\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcla.70095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic Value of a Novel Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization
Background
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Accurate prognosis prediction and risk stratification are crucial for individualized treatment. We sought to develop a novel prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary clinical and laboratory factors for estimating individual prognosis.
Methods
A total of 180 HCC patients treated with TACE were used to identify the risk factors and generate prognostic models by Cox regression analyses. Model performance was evaluated by comparing it with the Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) and Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer (BCLC) staging systems.
Results
A prognosis model (PI score), which consisted of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and TNM stage, was constructed. The PI scores of each patient were calculated, and the patients were divided into subgroups based on their PI scores. The OS rate of patients in the low-risk group (PI < 0.87) was better than that of the patients in the high-risk group (PI ≥ 0.87), p < 0.001. Patients were then further divided into four stages: early stage (PI ≤ 0.49), middle stage (0.49 < PI ≤ 0.87), advanced stage (0.87 < PI ≤ 1.48), and end stage (PI > 1.48). There were statistically significant differences between the OS rates of the four groups (p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for PI score (0.746, 0.643–0.783) was higher than those of TNM (0.699, 0.620–0.763) and BCLC (0.692, 0.617–0.760).
Conclusions
The PI score had excellent predictive value for HCC patients undergoing TACE and was superior to TNM and BCLC.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.