南加州结构消防员候选人比德尔体能测试(BPAT)的尝试表现。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/LGER1776
Robert G Lockie, Joseph M Dulla, Jennifer Meloni, Kristina A Ross, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Tomas J Ruvalcaba
{"title":"南加州结构消防员候选人比德尔体能测试(BPAT)的尝试表现。","authors":"Robert G Lockie, Joseph M Dulla, Jennifer Meloni, Kristina A Ross, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Tomas J Ruvalcaba","doi":"10.70252/LGER1776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) is a job task simulation that must be completed in ≤9:34 min:s by structural firefighter candidates to be accepted to a fire training academy. This study investigated the influence of prior attempts on BPAT time. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 1435 male and 72 female candidates. All participants received equivalent instruction on how to complete the BPAT which incorporated: dry hose drag; charged hose drag; halyard raise; roof walk; attic crawl; roof ventilation; victim removal; ladder removal and carry; stair climb with hose bundle; crawling search; stair climb with air bottles; and hose hoist. Candidates in the dataset were split into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni post hoc, compared groups in BPAT time (all times combined and passing times only; <i>p</i>≤0.05). All candidates who failed to meet time requirements, did not finish, or were disqualified, were recorded. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd attempt groups were significantly (<i>p</i>≤0.007) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups when considering all and passing times. The percentage of candidates that did not pass the BPAT relative to their attempt group was: 1st = 13%; 2nd = 6%; 3rd = 7%; 4th = 2%; 5th = 0%; ≥6th = <1%. Most candidates passed the BPAT. However, BPAT practice based on previous attempts generally led to faster times and more candidates passing. It could be beneficial for candidates to attend practice courses and fitness training sessions to improve BPAT performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 8","pages":"895-909"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates.\",\"authors\":\"Robert G Lockie, Joseph M Dulla, Jennifer Meloni, Kristina A Ross, Robin M Orr, J Jay Dawes, Tomas J Ruvalcaba\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/LGER1776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) is a job task simulation that must be completed in ≤9:34 min:s by structural firefighter candidates to be accepted to a fire training academy. This study investigated the influence of prior attempts on BPAT time. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 1435 male and 72 female candidates. All participants received equivalent instruction on how to complete the BPAT which incorporated: dry hose drag; charged hose drag; halyard raise; roof walk; attic crawl; roof ventilation; victim removal; ladder removal and carry; stair climb with hose bundle; crawling search; stair climb with air bottles; and hose hoist. Candidates in the dataset were split into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni post hoc, compared groups in BPAT time (all times combined and passing times only; <i>p</i>≤0.05). All candidates who failed to meet time requirements, did not finish, or were disqualified, were recorded. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd attempt groups were significantly (<i>p</i>≤0.007) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups when considering all and passing times. The percentage of candidates that did not pass the BPAT relative to their attempt group was: 1st = 13%; 2nd = 6%; 3rd = 7%; 4th = 2%; 5th = 0%; ≥6th = <1%. Most candidates passed the BPAT. However, BPAT practice based on previous attempts generally led to faster times and more candidates passing. It could be beneficial for candidates to attend practice courses and fitness training sessions to improve BPAT performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"895-909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12408076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/LGER1776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/LGER1776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比德尔体能测试(BPAT)是一项工作任务模拟,应聘者必须在≤9:34 min:s的时间内完成,才能被消防培训学院录取。本研究探讨了先前尝试对BPAT时间的影响。回顾性分析了1435名男性和72名女性候选人。所有参与者都接受了关于如何完成BPAT的同等指导,其中包括:干软管阻力;充气软管阻力;吊索提高;屋顶走;阁楼爬行;屋顶通风;受害者去除;梯子拆卸和搬运;带软管包的爬楼梯;爬行搜索;用气瓶爬楼梯;软管提升机。数据集中的候选者被分成第1、2、3、4、5和≥6次尝试组。采用Bonferroni post hoc的单因素方差分析比较各组BPAT时间(所有时间合并和仅通过时间;p≤0.05)。所有未达到时间要求、未完成或被取消资格的考生都将被记录在案。考虑所有时间和通过时间,第1、2、3次尝试组显著(p≤0.007)慢于第4、5、≥6次尝试组。未通过BPAT考试的考生相对于他们的尝试组的百分比是:1 = 13%;2 = 6%;第3 = 7%;4 = 2%;5 = 0%;≥6 =
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates.

Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates.

Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) Performance by Attempt in Southern California Structural Firefighter Candidates.

The Biddle Physical Ability Test (BPAT) is a job task simulation that must be completed in ≤9:34 min:s by structural firefighter candidates to be accepted to a fire training academy. This study investigated the influence of prior attempts on BPAT time. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 1435 male and 72 female candidates. All participants received equivalent instruction on how to complete the BPAT which incorporated: dry hose drag; charged hose drag; halyard raise; roof walk; attic crawl; roof ventilation; victim removal; ladder removal and carry; stair climb with hose bundle; crawling search; stair climb with air bottles; and hose hoist. Candidates in the dataset were split into 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups. A one-way ANOVA, with Bonferroni post hoc, compared groups in BPAT time (all times combined and passing times only; p≤0.05). All candidates who failed to meet time requirements, did not finish, or were disqualified, were recorded. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd attempt groups were significantly (p≤0.007) slower than the 4th, 5th, and ≥6th attempt groups when considering all and passing times. The percentage of candidates that did not pass the BPAT relative to their attempt group was: 1st = 13%; 2nd = 6%; 3rd = 7%; 4th = 2%; 5th = 0%; ≥6th = <1%. Most candidates passed the BPAT. However, BPAT practice based on previous attempts generally led to faster times and more candidates passing. It could be beneficial for candidates to attend practice courses and fitness training sessions to improve BPAT performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信