Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi
{"title":"在速度的统治下:弹道训练提高长期力量训练运动员的快速发力。","authors":"Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rapid force production relies upon neuromuscular mechanisms differing from those underlying maximal strength. In chronically strength-trained individuals, specific adaptations in rapid force variables (RFVs)-both absolute and normalized to maximal force capacity-following resistance training with ballistic versus controlled contractions remain underexplored. Therefore, we examined whether improvements in maximal propulsive power (MaxPP) coincide with RFV responses, specifically, rate of force development (RFD) and impulse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten elite athletes (female n = 5) underwent maximal-intended-velocity (MIV) training and were compared with 10 (female n = 5) elite athletes performing moderate-velocity (MOV) training lasting 4 weeks. One-maximum repetition (1RM), MaxPP, and RFVs (RFD and impulse) were assessed at baseline and following 4 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant increases in 1RM (MIV: +13.9 kg, P < .001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < .001). Although absolute MaxPP, RFD, and impulse improved in both groups, only the MIV group showed significant enhancements when normalized to 1RM (MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = .002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = .004; impulse: +5% 1RM·s, P = .01). In contrast, MOV training reduced normalized MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04) and RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02), with no significant change in impulse. A positive association was observed between improvements in MaxPP and RFD (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings recognize ballistic contractions as the primary driver of improvements in RFVs among chronically strength-trained individuals. The parallel increase in MaxPP and RFD underscores the intrinsic relationship between the physiological capacity for rapid force generation and the resultant contraction speed, with the velocity demands placed on the neuromuscular system during resistance training governing these adaptations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Reign of Velocity: Ballistic Training Enhances Rapid Force Production in Chronically Strength-Trained Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Rapid force production relies upon neuromuscular mechanisms differing from those underlying maximal strength. In chronically strength-trained individuals, specific adaptations in rapid force variables (RFVs)-both absolute and normalized to maximal force capacity-following resistance training with ballistic versus controlled contractions remain underexplored. Therefore, we examined whether improvements in maximal propulsive power (MaxPP) coincide with RFV responses, specifically, rate of force development (RFD) and impulse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten elite athletes (female n = 5) underwent maximal-intended-velocity (MIV) training and were compared with 10 (female n = 5) elite athletes performing moderate-velocity (MOV) training lasting 4 weeks. One-maximum repetition (1RM), MaxPP, and RFVs (RFD and impulse) were assessed at baseline and following 4 weeks of training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups exhibited significant increases in 1RM (MIV: +13.9 kg, P < .001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < .001). Although absolute MaxPP, RFD, and impulse improved in both groups, only the MIV group showed significant enhancements when normalized to 1RM (MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = .002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = .004; impulse: +5% 1RM·s, P = .01). In contrast, MOV training reduced normalized MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04) and RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02), with no significant change in impulse. A positive association was observed between improvements in MaxPP and RFD (P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings recognize ballistic contractions as the primary driver of improvements in RFVs among chronically strength-trained individuals. The parallel increase in MaxPP and RFD underscores the intrinsic relationship between the physiological capacity for rapid force generation and the resultant contraction speed, with the velocity demands placed on the neuromuscular system during resistance training governing these adaptations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2025-0115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:快速的力量产生依赖于不同于潜在的最大力量的神经肌肉机制。在长期力量训练的个体中,快速力量变量(rfv)的特定适应-绝对和标准化到最大力量-在弹道与控制收缩的阻力训练之后仍然没有得到充分的研究。因此,我们研究了最大推进功率(MaxPP)的提高是否与RFV响应一致,特别是力发展率(RFD)和冲量。方法:10名优秀运动员(女n = 5)进行最大预期速度(MIV)训练,与10名优秀运动员(女n = 5)进行为期4周的中速(MOV)训练进行比较。在基线和训练4周后评估一次最大重复(1RM)、MaxPP和rfv (RFD和冲量)。结果:两组1RM均显著升高(MIV: +13.9 kg, P < 0.001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < 0.001)。虽然两组的绝对MaxPP、RFD和冲量均有改善,但只有MIV组在归一化到1RM时有显著增强(MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = 0.002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = 0.004;冲量:+5% 1RM·s, P = 0.01)。相比之下,MOV训练降低了归一化MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04)和RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02),但冲量没有显著变化。MaxPP的改善与RFD呈正相关(P < 0.01)。结论:这些发现承认弹道收缩是长期力量训练个体中rfv改善的主要驱动因素。MaxPP和RFD的平行增加强调了快速产生力量的生理能力与由此产生的收缩速度之间的内在关系,而在阻力训练中对神经肌肉系统的速度要求控制了这些适应。
In the Reign of Velocity: Ballistic Training Enhances Rapid Force Production in Chronically Strength-Trained Athletes.
Purpose: Rapid force production relies upon neuromuscular mechanisms differing from those underlying maximal strength. In chronically strength-trained individuals, specific adaptations in rapid force variables (RFVs)-both absolute and normalized to maximal force capacity-following resistance training with ballistic versus controlled contractions remain underexplored. Therefore, we examined whether improvements in maximal propulsive power (MaxPP) coincide with RFV responses, specifically, rate of force development (RFD) and impulse.
Methods: Ten elite athletes (female n = 5) underwent maximal-intended-velocity (MIV) training and were compared with 10 (female n = 5) elite athletes performing moderate-velocity (MOV) training lasting 4 weeks. One-maximum repetition (1RM), MaxPP, and RFVs (RFD and impulse) were assessed at baseline and following 4 weeks of training.
Results: Both groups exhibited significant increases in 1RM (MIV: +13.9 kg, P < .001; MOV: +14.4 kg, P < .001). Although absolute MaxPP, RFD, and impulse improved in both groups, only the MIV group showed significant enhancements when normalized to 1RM (MaxPP: +13 W %1RM-1, P = .002; RFD: +61% 1RM·s-1, P = .004; impulse: +5% 1RM·s, P = .01). In contrast, MOV training reduced normalized MaxPP (-3 W %1RM-1, P = .04) and RFD (-15% 1RM·s-1, P = .02), with no significant change in impulse. A positive association was observed between improvements in MaxPP and RFD (P < .01).
Conclusions: These findings recognize ballistic contractions as the primary driver of improvements in RFVs among chronically strength-trained individuals. The parallel increase in MaxPP and RFD underscores the intrinsic relationship between the physiological capacity for rapid force generation and the resultant contraction speed, with the velocity demands placed on the neuromuscular system during resistance training governing these adaptations.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.