Dong Ho Lee, Heejin Cho, Su Jong Yu, Min Kyung Park, Yun Bin Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon
{"title":"通过检测慢性乙型肝炎患者早期肝细胞癌的替代监测改善预后。","authors":"Dong Ho Lee, Heejin Cho, Su Jong Yu, Min Kyung Park, Yun Bin Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon","doi":"10.5009/gnl240602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Current guidelines recommend biannual ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used when ultrasound is inadequate. The clinical impact of these alternative modalities remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHB patients undergoing regular HCC surveillance were classified into two groups: ultrasound-only and alternative surveillance (CT/MRI). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the Risk Estimation for HCC in CHB (REACH-B) score. Outcomes included 10-year overall survival (OS), HCC tumor size, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at diagnosis, and OS after HCC diagnosis. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,024 patients were included after propensity score matching to ensure balanced baseline characteristics, with 1,012 patients in each group. OS was similar (ultrasound-only 96.0% vs alternative 96.8%; p=0.379). HCC occurred in 66 patients in each group. Alternative surveillance detected smaller HCC tumors (1.6 cm vs 2.1 cm; p<0.001) and more BCLC stage 0 cases (alternative 71.2% vs ultrasound-only 42.4%; p=0.003). The OS after HCC diagnosis was higher with alternative surveillance (83.0% vs 67.0%; p=0.025). In high-risk patients (n=970), alternative surveillance increased the OS (97.3% vs 93.6%; p=0.029) and the OS after HCC diagnosis (83.0% vs 60.6%; p=0.010). No significant differences were observed in low-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT/MRI-based alternative surveillance led to earlier HCC detection and improved post-diagnosis survival, particularly in high-risk CHB patients, supporting its potential role as an alternative to ultrasound in selected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12885,"journal":{"name":"Gut and Liver","volume":" ","pages":"770-780"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Surveillance Improves Outcomes by Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Dong Ho Lee, Heejin Cho, Su Jong Yu, Min Kyung Park, Yun Bin Lee, Eun Ju Cho, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Yoon Jun Kim, Jung-Hwan Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.5009/gnl240602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Current guidelines recommend biannual ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used when ultrasound is inadequate. The clinical impact of these alternative modalities remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CHB patients undergoing regular HCC surveillance were classified into two groups: ultrasound-only and alternative surveillance (CT/MRI). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the Risk Estimation for HCC in CHB (REACH-B) score. Outcomes included 10-year overall survival (OS), HCC tumor size, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at diagnosis, and OS after HCC diagnosis. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,024 patients were included after propensity score matching to ensure balanced baseline characteristics, with 1,012 patients in each group. OS was similar (ultrasound-only 96.0% vs alternative 96.8%; p=0.379). HCC occurred in 66 patients in each group. Alternative surveillance detected smaller HCC tumors (1.6 cm vs 2.1 cm; p<0.001) and more BCLC stage 0 cases (alternative 71.2% vs ultrasound-only 42.4%; p=0.003). The OS after HCC diagnosis was higher with alternative surveillance (83.0% vs 67.0%; p=0.025). In high-risk patients (n=970), alternative surveillance increased the OS (97.3% vs 93.6%; p=0.029) and the OS after HCC diagnosis (83.0% vs 60.6%; p=0.010). No significant differences were observed in low-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CT/MRI-based alternative surveillance led to earlier HCC detection and improved post-diagnosis survival, particularly in high-risk CHB patients, supporting its potential role as an alternative to ultrasound in selected populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gut and Liver\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"770-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gut and Liver\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240602\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut and Liver","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl240602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alternative Surveillance Improves Outcomes by Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.
Background/aims: Current guidelines recommend biannual ultrasound for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. However, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used when ultrasound is inadequate. The clinical impact of these alternative modalities remains unclear.
Methods: CHB patients undergoing regular HCC surveillance were classified into two groups: ultrasound-only and alternative surveillance (CT/MRI). Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups using the Risk Estimation for HCC in CHB (REACH-B) score. Outcomes included 10-year overall survival (OS), HCC tumor size, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage at diagnosis, and OS after HCC diagnosis. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics.
Results: A total of 2,024 patients were included after propensity score matching to ensure balanced baseline characteristics, with 1,012 patients in each group. OS was similar (ultrasound-only 96.0% vs alternative 96.8%; p=0.379). HCC occurred in 66 patients in each group. Alternative surveillance detected smaller HCC tumors (1.6 cm vs 2.1 cm; p<0.001) and more BCLC stage 0 cases (alternative 71.2% vs ultrasound-only 42.4%; p=0.003). The OS after HCC diagnosis was higher with alternative surveillance (83.0% vs 67.0%; p=0.025). In high-risk patients (n=970), alternative surveillance increased the OS (97.3% vs 93.6%; p=0.029) and the OS after HCC diagnosis (83.0% vs 60.6%; p=0.010). No significant differences were observed in low-risk patients.
Conclusions: CT/MRI-based alternative surveillance led to earlier HCC detection and improved post-diagnosis survival, particularly in high-risk CHB patients, supporting its potential role as an alternative to ultrasound in selected populations.
期刊介绍:
Gut and Liver is an international journal of gastroenterology, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract, liver, biliary tree, pancreas, motility, and neurogastroenterology. Gut and Liver delivers up-to-date, authoritative papers on both clinical and research-based topics in gastroenterology. The Journal publishes original articles, case reports, brief communications, letters to the editor and invited review articles in the field of gastroenterology. The Journal is operated by internationally renowned editorial boards and designed to provide a global opportunity to promote academic developments in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Gut and Liver is jointly owned and operated by 8 affiliated societies in the field of gastroenterology, namely: the Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer.