鼻过敏试验诊断准确性的解释。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Fejzo Džafić, Ademir Ahmetović, Nur Čoloman, Ismail Džafić, Maida Šljivić Husejnović
{"title":"鼻过敏试验诊断准确性的解释。","authors":"Fejzo Džafić, Ademir Ahmetović, Nur Čoloman, Ismail Džafić, Maida Šljivić Husejnović","doi":"10.1159/000548221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent health concern. In Europe, 20-40% of the population is affected. Diagnostic methods include skin tests, measurement of serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), nasal smear for eosinophils, and inhalation provocation tests. The introduction of the nasal allergy test has simplified allergen testing for the direct determination of specific IgE on the nasal mucosa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study conducted from 2010 to 2012 included 102 participants diagnosed with AR and 60 control participants without persistent AR, based on medical history and physical examination. Participants from both groups underwent a nasal test using prepared inhalant allergy panels. Specific IgE was tested using the ELISA processor Hytec 288. The aim of the study was to interpret diagnostic accuracy measures for each allergen panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nasal allergy test demonstrated sensitivity above 75 %, and specificity approaching 90 %. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.25 %, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 71 %. The positive likelihood ratio ranged from 3.75 to 34.59, indicating that a positive result was 10.23 times more likely in patients than in controls. A negative likelihood ratio was 0.25, suggesting that participants in the control group were four times more likely to yield a negative result than allergic individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nasal allergy test is recommended due to its simplicity, minimal risk profile compared to conventional tests, and high diagnostic reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpretation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Nasal Allergy Test.\",\"authors\":\"Fejzo Džafić, Ademir Ahmetović, Nur Čoloman, Ismail Džafić, Maida Šljivić Husejnović\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent health concern. In Europe, 20-40% of the population is affected. Diagnostic methods include skin tests, measurement of serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), nasal smear for eosinophils, and inhalation provocation tests. The introduction of the nasal allergy test has simplified allergen testing for the direct determination of specific IgE on the nasal mucosa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study conducted from 2010 to 2012 included 102 participants diagnosed with AR and 60 control participants without persistent AR, based on medical history and physical examination. Participants from both groups underwent a nasal test using prepared inhalant allergy panels. Specific IgE was tested using the ELISA processor Hytec 288. The aim of the study was to interpret diagnostic accuracy measures for each allergen panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The nasal allergy test demonstrated sensitivity above 75 %, and specificity approaching 90 %. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.25 %, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 71 %. The positive likelihood ratio ranged from 3.75 to 34.59, indicating that a positive result was 10.23 times more likely in patients than in controls. A negative likelihood ratio was 0.25, suggesting that participants in the control group were four times more likely to yield a negative result than allergic individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nasal allergy test is recommended due to its simplicity, minimal risk profile compared to conventional tests, and high diagnostic reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一种普遍存在的健康问题。在欧洲,20-40%的人口受到影响。诊断方法包括皮肤试验、血清免疫球蛋白E (IgE)测定、嗜酸性粒细胞鼻涂片和吸入激发试验。鼻过敏试验的引入简化了直接测定鼻黏膜特异性IgE的过敏原试验。方法:基于病史和体格检查,2010 - 2012年进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了102名诊断为AR的参与者和60名无持续性AR的对照组。两组的参与者都使用准备好的吸入剂过敏小组进行了鼻腔测试。采用ELISA处理程序Hytec 288检测特异性IgE。该研究的目的是解释每个过敏原小组的诊断准确性措施。结果:鼻变态反应试验敏感性在75%以上,特异性接近90%。阳性预测值(PPV) 91.25%,阴性预测值(NPV) 71%。阳性似然比为3.75 ~ 34.59,表明患者阳性的可能性是对照组的10.23倍。负似然比为0.25,表明对照组的参与者产生阴性结果的可能性是过敏个体的四倍。结论:鼻过敏试验简便,与常规试验相比风险最小,诊断可靠性高,值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpretation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Nasal Allergy Test.

Introduction: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent health concern. In Europe, 20-40% of the population is affected. Diagnostic methods include skin tests, measurement of serum immunoglobulin E (IgE), nasal smear for eosinophils, and inhalation provocation tests. The introduction of the nasal allergy test has simplified allergen testing for the direct determination of specific IgE on the nasal mucosa.

Methods: A prospective study conducted from 2010 to 2012 included 102 participants diagnosed with AR and 60 control participants without persistent AR, based on medical history and physical examination. Participants from both groups underwent a nasal test using prepared inhalant allergy panels. Specific IgE was tested using the ELISA processor Hytec 288. The aim of the study was to interpret diagnostic accuracy measures for each allergen panel.

Results: The nasal allergy test demonstrated sensitivity above 75 %, and specificity approaching 90 %. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.25 %, while the negative predictive value (NPV) was 71 %. The positive likelihood ratio ranged from 3.75 to 34.59, indicating that a positive result was 10.23 times more likely in patients than in controls. A negative likelihood ratio was 0.25, suggesting that participants in the control group were four times more likely to yield a negative result than allergic individuals.

Conclusion: The nasal allergy test is recommended due to its simplicity, minimal risk profile compared to conventional tests, and high diagnostic reliability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信