Sarah Mendorf, Konstantin G Heimrich, Hannah M Mühlhammer, Tino Prell, Aline Schönenberg
{"title":"社区居住老年人生活质量的年龄相关轨迹:来自欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的结果。","authors":"Sarah Mendorf, Konstantin G Heimrich, Hannah M Mühlhammer, Tino Prell, Aline Schönenberg","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous longitudinal studies have identified numerous factors influencing quality of life (QoL) in people of older age (PoA). However, most of these studies focus on group-level trends and fail to consider individual QoL trajectories or age-specific patterns over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated longitudinal changes in QoL among community-dwelling older adults using five waves (2010-2019) of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (easySHARE). Clinically relevant changes were defined via the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We applied linear regression and linear mixed models (LMM) to explore predictors of QoL trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analyses showed that 2481 PoA (19.7%) experienced stable QoL between waves, based on changes below the MCID threshold of 3.18 points. The remaining participants exhibited consistent improvements or declines, with 1,701 different longitudinal patterns of QoL identified across the five time points. These individual patterns were further examined using LMM. LMM showed that the random effect of ID had the strongest impact on QoL across the five waves, suggesting highly individual QoL patterns. The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore the importance of individual-level analyses in aging research. While QoL may appear stable at the group level, individual trajectories vary considerably. This has important implications for the use of QoL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials, particularly in geriatric populations. Notably, age alone did not significantly influence QoL over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1632607"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mendorf, Konstantin G Heimrich, Hannah M Mühlhammer, Tino Prell, Aline Schönenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous longitudinal studies have identified numerous factors influencing quality of life (QoL) in people of older age (PoA). However, most of these studies focus on group-level trends and fail to consider individual QoL trajectories or age-specific patterns over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated longitudinal changes in QoL among community-dwelling older adults using five waves (2010-2019) of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (easySHARE). Clinically relevant changes were defined via the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We applied linear regression and linear mixed models (LMM) to explore predictors of QoL trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive analyses showed that 2481 PoA (19.7%) experienced stable QoL between waves, based on changes below the MCID threshold of 3.18 points. The remaining participants exhibited consistent improvements or declines, with 1,701 different longitudinal patterns of QoL identified across the five time points. These individual patterns were further examined using LMM. LMM showed that the random effect of ID had the strongest impact on QoL across the five waves, suggesting highly individual QoL patterns. The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore the importance of individual-level analyses in aging research. While QoL may appear stable at the group level, individual trajectories vary considerably. This has important implications for the use of QoL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials, particularly in geriatric populations. Notably, age alone did not significantly influence QoL over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1632607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12405344/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632607\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1632607","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Age-related trajectories of quality of life in community dwelling older adults: findings from the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).
Introduction: Previous longitudinal studies have identified numerous factors influencing quality of life (QoL) in people of older age (PoA). However, most of these studies focus on group-level trends and fail to consider individual QoL trajectories or age-specific patterns over time.
Methods: We investigated longitudinal changes in QoL among community-dwelling older adults using five waves (2010-2019) of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (easySHARE). Clinically relevant changes were defined via the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). We applied linear regression and linear mixed models (LMM) to explore predictors of QoL trajectories.
Results: Descriptive analyses showed that 2481 PoA (19.7%) experienced stable QoL between waves, based on changes below the MCID threshold of 3.18 points. The remaining participants exhibited consistent improvements or declines, with 1,701 different longitudinal patterns of QoL identified across the five time points. These individual patterns were further examined using LMM. LMM showed that the random effect of ID had the strongest impact on QoL across the five waves, suggesting highly individual QoL patterns. The influence of age was less significant compared to ID and decreased significantly after the addition of covariates.
Conclusion: Our findings underscore the importance of individual-level analyses in aging research. While QoL may appear stable at the group level, individual trajectories vary considerably. This has important implications for the use of QoL as a primary endpoint in clinical trials, particularly in geriatric populations. Notably, age alone did not significantly influence QoL over time.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.