响度和声音类别:它们在形成对声景的知觉和生理反应中的独特作用。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
eNeuro Pub Date : 2025-09-25 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1523/ENEURO.0146-25.2025
Mercede Erfanian, Tin Oberman, Maria Chait, Jian Kang
{"title":"响度和声音类别:它们在形成对声景的知觉和生理反应中的独特作用。","authors":"Mercede Erfanian, Tin Oberman, Maria Chait, Jian Kang","doi":"10.1523/ENEURO.0146-25.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When compared with nature sounds, exposure to mechanical sounds evokes higher levels of perceptual and physiological arousal, prompting the recruitment of attentional and physiological resources to elicit adaptive responses. However, it is unclear whether these attributes are solely related to the sound intensity of mechanical sounds, since in most real-world scenarios, mechanical sounds are present at high intensities or if other acoustic or semantic factors are also at play. We measured the skin conductance response (SCR), reflecting sympathetic nervous system activity as well as the pleasantness and eventfulness of the soundscape across two passive and active listening tasks in healthy subjects (<i>N</i> = 25; 14 females, 11 males). The auditory stimuli were divided into two categories, nature and mechanical sounds, and were manipulated to vary in three perceived loudness levels. As expected, we found that the sound category influenced perceived soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness. SCR was analyzed by taking the mean level across the stimulus epoch and also by quantifying its dynamics. We found that mean SCR was modulated by loudness only. SCR rise-time (a measure of the time it takes the skin response to increase from the baseline to its maximum value) correlated significantly with soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness for nature and mechanical sounds. This study highlights the importance of considering both the loudness level and sound category in evaluating the perceptual soundscape, and it identifies SCR as a valuable tool for such assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11617,"journal":{"name":"eNeuro","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loudness and Sound Category: Their Distinct Roles in Shaping Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Soundscapes.\",\"authors\":\"Mercede Erfanian, Tin Oberman, Maria Chait, Jian Kang\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/ENEURO.0146-25.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When compared with nature sounds, exposure to mechanical sounds evokes higher levels of perceptual and physiological arousal, prompting the recruitment of attentional and physiological resources to elicit adaptive responses. However, it is unclear whether these attributes are solely related to the sound intensity of mechanical sounds, since in most real-world scenarios, mechanical sounds are present at high intensities or if other acoustic or semantic factors are also at play. We measured the skin conductance response (SCR), reflecting sympathetic nervous system activity as well as the pleasantness and eventfulness of the soundscape across two passive and active listening tasks in healthy subjects (<i>N</i> = 25; 14 females, 11 males). The auditory stimuli were divided into two categories, nature and mechanical sounds, and were manipulated to vary in three perceived loudness levels. As expected, we found that the sound category influenced perceived soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness. SCR was analyzed by taking the mean level across the stimulus epoch and also by quantifying its dynamics. We found that mean SCR was modulated by loudness only. SCR rise-time (a measure of the time it takes the skin response to increase from the baseline to its maximum value) correlated significantly with soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness for nature and mechanical sounds. This study highlights the importance of considering both the loudness level and sound category in evaluating the perceptual soundscape, and it identifies SCR as a valuable tool for such assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eNeuro\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eNeuro\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0146-25.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eNeuro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0146-25.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与自然声音相比,接触机械声音会唤起更高水平的感知和生理唤醒,促使注意力和生理资源的募集,以引发适应性反应。然而,目前尚不清楚这些属性是否仅与机械声音的声音强度有关,因为在大多数现实世界中,机械声音以高强度存在,或者其他声学或语义因素也在起作用。我们测量了25名健康受试者的皮肤电导反应(SCR),反映了交感神经系统(SNS)的活动,以及在被动和主动聆听任务中所听到的声音景观的愉悦性和事件性(N = 25; 14名女性,11名男性)。听觉刺激被分为两类,自然声音和机械声音,并被操纵在三个感知的响度水平上变化。正如预期的那样,我们发现声音类别影响感知的音景愉悦性和事件性。SCR的分析方法是取整个刺激时期的平均水平,并对其动态进行量化。我们发现平均SCR仅由响度调制。SCR上升时间(皮肤反应从基线增加到最大值所需时间的测量)与自然和机械声音的音景愉悦性和事件性显著相关。本研究强调了在评估感知音景时考虑响度水平和声音类别的重要性,强调了SCR作为此类评估的有价值工具。虽然响亮的机械声音通常被认为比自然声音更令人不愉快,但目前尚不清楚这种反应是由于声音本身还是声音的来源。这项研究通过使用皮肤电导反应来解开这些影响,皮肤电导反应是人体自动无意识反应的一个窗口,揭示了声音是生理唤醒的关键驱动因素。然而,听者对音景的愉悦感或事件感的主观感知也会显著影响这种反应。这些发现强调了物理声音特性和感知经验在塑造我们对日常声音环境的反应之间的动态关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loudness and Sound Category: Their Distinct Roles in Shaping Perceptual and Physiological Responses to Soundscapes.

When compared with nature sounds, exposure to mechanical sounds evokes higher levels of perceptual and physiological arousal, prompting the recruitment of attentional and physiological resources to elicit adaptive responses. However, it is unclear whether these attributes are solely related to the sound intensity of mechanical sounds, since in most real-world scenarios, mechanical sounds are present at high intensities or if other acoustic or semantic factors are also at play. We measured the skin conductance response (SCR), reflecting sympathetic nervous system activity as well as the pleasantness and eventfulness of the soundscape across two passive and active listening tasks in healthy subjects (N = 25; 14 females, 11 males). The auditory stimuli were divided into two categories, nature and mechanical sounds, and were manipulated to vary in three perceived loudness levels. As expected, we found that the sound category influenced perceived soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness. SCR was analyzed by taking the mean level across the stimulus epoch and also by quantifying its dynamics. We found that mean SCR was modulated by loudness only. SCR rise-time (a measure of the time it takes the skin response to increase from the baseline to its maximum value) correlated significantly with soundscape pleasantness and eventfulness for nature and mechanical sounds. This study highlights the importance of considering both the loudness level and sound category in evaluating the perceptual soundscape, and it identifies SCR as a valuable tool for such assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eNeuro
eNeuro Neuroscience-General Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
486
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An open-access journal from the Society for Neuroscience, eNeuro publishes high-quality, broad-based, peer-reviewed research focused solely on the field of neuroscience. eNeuro embodies an emerging scientific vision that offers a new experience for authors and readers, all in support of the Society’s mission to advance understanding of the brain and nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信