个人护理产品中阿伏苯宗(丁基甲氧基二苯甲酰甲烷)毒理学数据和人体暴露评估的综合审查。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Critical Reviews in Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1080/10408444.2025.2535394
Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Carl D'Ruiz, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash
{"title":"个人护理产品中阿伏苯宗(丁基甲氧基二苯甲酰甲烷)毒理学数据和人体暴露评估的综合审查。","authors":"Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Carl D'Ruiz, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash","doi":"10.1080/10408444.2025.2535394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) was conducted to assess its safety as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations. Avobenzone has a suitable safety profile without any clear markers of toxicity or endpoints of concern. There are sufficient clinical studies and <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies in animal models to assess avobenzone's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties, supportive of its long history of safe use. No harmonized dermal absorption value was available, but the clinical data indicate low percutaneous absorption of avobenzone in humans (≤0.59% of the applied dose). There were no data to characterize the distribution of avobenzone; however, four tentative metabolites of avobenzone have been identified, and limited excretion in urine was demonstrated in human biomonitoring studies. Avobenzone generally did not cause dermal irritation or sensitization, but indications of photoallergy have been reported in clinical case studies. The acute toxicity profile indicated that avobenzone has minimal toxicity. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for general toxicity from a rat dietary subchronic toxicity study was 450 mg/kg/day. There was no evidence of avobenzone effects on immune tissues or the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid systems. Although there were no formal 2-year carcinogenicity studies for avobenzone, a 90-day dietary exposure study in rats did not show any increase in hyperplasia of any tissue or evidence of cytotoxicity, and avobenzone has not shown any indication of genotoxicity either <i>in vitro</i> or <i>in vivo</i>. Together, this indicates that key events for modes of action for avobenzone are absent and carcinogenicity in humans is unlikely. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of exposure (defined as the ratio of NOAEL to SED) greater than 100 were obtained for avobenzone. Therefore, the available data show that avobenzone is unlikely to pose a risk to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to the permitted maximum usage levels in the United States and Canada, which is 3%.</p>","PeriodicalId":10869,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"662-692"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive review of avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly G Norman, Lewis E Kaufman, Carl D'Ruiz, Linda Loretz, Alexandra Kowcz, Samuel M Cohen, Anthony R Scialli, Alan R Boobis, David Jacobson-Kram, Rita Schoeny, Thomas J Rosol, Gary M Williams, Norbert E Kaminski, F Peter Guengerich, J F Nash\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408444.2025.2535394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) was conducted to assess its safety as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations. Avobenzone has a suitable safety profile without any clear markers of toxicity or endpoints of concern. There are sufficient clinical studies and <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies in animal models to assess avobenzone's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties, supportive of its long history of safe use. No harmonized dermal absorption value was available, but the clinical data indicate low percutaneous absorption of avobenzone in humans (≤0.59% of the applied dose). There were no data to characterize the distribution of avobenzone; however, four tentative metabolites of avobenzone have been identified, and limited excretion in urine was demonstrated in human biomonitoring studies. Avobenzone generally did not cause dermal irritation or sensitization, but indications of photoallergy have been reported in clinical case studies. The acute toxicity profile indicated that avobenzone has minimal toxicity. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for general toxicity from a rat dietary subchronic toxicity study was 450 mg/kg/day. There was no evidence of avobenzone effects on immune tissues or the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid systems. Although there were no formal 2-year carcinogenicity studies for avobenzone, a 90-day dietary exposure study in rats did not show any increase in hyperplasia of any tissue or evidence of cytotoxicity, and avobenzone has not shown any indication of genotoxicity either <i>in vitro</i> or <i>in vivo</i>. Together, this indicates that key events for modes of action for avobenzone are absent and carcinogenicity in humans is unlikely. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of exposure (defined as the ratio of NOAEL to SED) greater than 100 were obtained for avobenzone. Therefore, the available data show that avobenzone is unlikely to pose a risk to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to the permitted maximum usage levels in the United States and Canada, which is 3%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"662-692\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Reviews in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2025.2535394\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408444.2025.2535394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对紫外线过滤剂阿伏苯宗(丁基甲氧基二苯甲酰甲烷)的现有毒性和人体暴露数据进行了全面审查,以评估其目前用于非处方防晒霜配方的安全性。阿伏苯宗具有适当的安全性,没有任何明确的毒性标记或关注的终点。有足够的临床研究和动物模型的体外和体内毒性研究来评估阿伏苯宗的药代动力学、药效学和潜在的毒理学特性,支持其长期安全使用的历史。没有统一的皮肤吸收值,但临床数据表明阿伏苯宗在人体中的经皮吸收低(≤0.59%的应用剂量)。没有资料表征阿伏苯宗的分布;然而,已经鉴定出阿伏苯宗的四种代谢物,并且在人体生物监测研究中证实了尿中有限的排泄。阿伏苯宗一般不会引起皮肤刺激或致敏,但在临床病例研究中报告了光过敏的指征。急性毒性谱显示阿伏苯宗毒性极小。在一项大鼠饮食亚慢性毒性研究中,一般毒性的未观察到不良反应水平(NOAEL)为450 mg/kg/天。没有证据表明阿伏苯宗对免疫组织或雌激素、雄激素或甲状腺系统有影响。虽然没有对阿伏苯宗进行为期2年的正式致癌性研究,但对大鼠进行的为期90天的饮食暴露研究没有显示出任何组织增生的增加或细胞毒性的证据,阿伏苯宗在体外或体内均未显示出任何遗传毒性的迹象。总之,这表明阿伏苯宗不存在作用模式的关键事件,不太可能对人类致癌。根据选择的大鼠亚慢性NOAEL和估计防晒霜产品应用的全身暴露剂量(SED)的保守假设,阿伏苯酮的暴露边际(定义为NOAEL与SED的比值)大于100。因此,现有数据表明,在防晒产品中使用阿伏苯宗,当其浓度达到美国和加拿大允许的最大使用量(3%)时,不太可能对人体健康构成风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive review of avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) toxicology data and human exposure assessment for personal care products.

A comprehensive review of existing toxicity and human exposure data for the ultraviolet filter avobenzone (butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane) was conducted to assess its safety as currently used in over-the-counter sunscreen formulations. Avobenzone has a suitable safety profile without any clear markers of toxicity or endpoints of concern. There are sufficient clinical studies and in vitro and in vivo toxicity studies in animal models to assess avobenzone's pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and potential toxicological properties, supportive of its long history of safe use. No harmonized dermal absorption value was available, but the clinical data indicate low percutaneous absorption of avobenzone in humans (≤0.59% of the applied dose). There were no data to characterize the distribution of avobenzone; however, four tentative metabolites of avobenzone have been identified, and limited excretion in urine was demonstrated in human biomonitoring studies. Avobenzone generally did not cause dermal irritation or sensitization, but indications of photoallergy have been reported in clinical case studies. The acute toxicity profile indicated that avobenzone has minimal toxicity. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for general toxicity from a rat dietary subchronic toxicity study was 450 mg/kg/day. There was no evidence of avobenzone effects on immune tissues or the estrogen, androgen, or thyroid systems. Although there were no formal 2-year carcinogenicity studies for avobenzone, a 90-day dietary exposure study in rats did not show any increase in hyperplasia of any tissue or evidence of cytotoxicity, and avobenzone has not shown any indication of genotoxicity either in vitro or in vivo. Together, this indicates that key events for modes of action for avobenzone are absent and carcinogenicity in humans is unlikely. Based on the selected rat subchronic NOAEL and conservative assumptions for estimating the systemic exposure dose (SED) from the application of sunscreen products, margins of exposure (defined as the ratio of NOAEL to SED) greater than 100 were obtained for avobenzone. Therefore, the available data show that avobenzone is unlikely to pose a risk to human health when used in sunscreen products at concentrations up to the permitted maximum usage levels in the United States and Canada, which is 3%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Toxicology provides up-to-date, objective analyses of topics related to the mechanisms of action, responses, and assessment of health risks due to toxicant exposure. The journal publishes critical, comprehensive reviews of research findings in toxicology and the application of toxicological information in assessing human health hazards and risks. Toxicants of concern include commodity and specialty chemicals such as formaldehyde, acrylonitrile, and pesticides; pharmaceutical agents of all types; consumer products such as macronutrients and food additives; environmental agents such as ambient ozone; and occupational exposures such as asbestos and benzene.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信