Andrei Chitul, Emilica Ciofic, Traean Burcoş, Daniel Cristian, Florin Grama
{"title":"腹会阴切除与保留括约肌技术治疗低位直肠癌后的功能结局和患者满意度:一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Andrei Chitul, Emilica Ciofic, Traean Burcoş, Daniel Cristian, Florin Grama","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In rectal cancer surgery, maintaining a balance between oncologic control and postoperative quality of life is critical. Sphincter-preserving procedures may offer better functional outcomes, but results vary depending on the technique used. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 62 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum 5 cm from the anal verge, operated between August 2022 and August 2024. All received standard neoadjuvant therapy. Patients underwent one of three procedures: abdominoperineal resection, standard coloanal anastomosis, or delayed coloanal anastomosis (Turnbull-Cutait). Functional outcomes were assessed using LARS and St Marks scores at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was evaluated via telephone interviews. <b>Results:</b> Seventeen patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, 10 received standard coloanal anastomosis, and 35 underwent the delayed technique. Standard anastomosis yielded significantly better continence scores than the Turnbull-Cutait group. Patients with abdominoperineal resection had higher rates of pulmonary complications and prolonged inflammation. At one year, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusion: All techniques can provide high satisfaction, but standard coloanal anastomosis appears to offer superior functional outcomes. Surgical decision-making should be individualized and based on thorough informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"120 4","pages":"409-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction after Abdominoperineal Resection versus Sphincter-Preserving Techniques for Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrei Chitul, Emilica Ciofic, Traean Burcoş, Daniel Cristian, Florin Grama\",\"doi\":\"10.21614/chirurgia.3152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In rectal cancer surgery, maintaining a balance between oncologic control and postoperative quality of life is critical. Sphincter-preserving procedures may offer better functional outcomes, but results vary depending on the technique used. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 62 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum 5 cm from the anal verge, operated between August 2022 and August 2024. All received standard neoadjuvant therapy. Patients underwent one of three procedures: abdominoperineal resection, standard coloanal anastomosis, or delayed coloanal anastomosis (Turnbull-Cutait). Functional outcomes were assessed using LARS and St Marks scores at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was evaluated via telephone interviews. <b>Results:</b> Seventeen patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, 10 received standard coloanal anastomosis, and 35 underwent the delayed technique. Standard anastomosis yielded significantly better continence scores than the Turnbull-Cutait group. Patients with abdominoperineal resection had higher rates of pulmonary complications and prolonged inflammation. At one year, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusion: All techniques can provide high satisfaction, but standard coloanal anastomosis appears to offer superior functional outcomes. Surgical decision-making should be individualized and based on thorough informed consent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"120 4\",\"pages\":\"409-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Functional Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction after Abdominoperineal Resection versus Sphincter-Preserving Techniques for Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.
Background: In rectal cancer surgery, maintaining a balance between oncologic control and postoperative quality of life is critical. Sphincter-preserving procedures may offer better functional outcomes, but results vary depending on the technique used. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 62 patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum 5 cm from the anal verge, operated between August 2022 and August 2024. All received standard neoadjuvant therapy. Patients underwent one of three procedures: abdominoperineal resection, standard coloanal anastomosis, or delayed coloanal anastomosis (Turnbull-Cutait). Functional outcomes were assessed using LARS and St Marks scores at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was evaluated via telephone interviews. Results: Seventeen patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, 10 received standard coloanal anastomosis, and 35 underwent the delayed technique. Standard anastomosis yielded significantly better continence scores than the Turnbull-Cutait group. Patients with abdominoperineal resection had higher rates of pulmonary complications and prolonged inflammation. At one year, 80% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. Conclusion: All techniques can provide high satisfaction, but standard coloanal anastomosis appears to offer superior functional outcomes. Surgical decision-making should be individualized and based on thorough informed consent.
期刊介绍:
Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither
appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles,
new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and,
depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications.
Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of
Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and
participation notes in other scientific meetings.
Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain
substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please
submit these letters to the editor through our online system.