Li-Tsung Lin , Hui-An Lin , Chyi-Huey Bai , Sheng-Feng Lin
{"title":"ICU幸存者抑制性控制的侧卫任务评估:对认知障碍的初步认识。","authors":"Li-Tsung Lin , Hui-An Lin , Chyi-Huey Bai , Sheng-Feng Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Cognitive assessment tools for ICU survivors often lack sensitivity to detect subtle impairments. This study examines whether combining standard screening instruments with computerized inhibitory control measures enhances post-ICU cognitive evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective cohort study conducted at a university-affiliated hospital, participants included ICU survivors aged ≥ 40 years, functionally independent prior to admission, and alert upon ICU discharge. Assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a computerized Flanker task evaluating response accuracy and reaction time. The Stroop task was used to validate agreement with the Flanker task.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 34 participants, median MMSE and MoCA scores were 25.5 and 24, respectively. Cognitive scores ≥ 25 were observed in 55.9 % (MMSE) and 44.1 % (MoCA). Participants in the highest MoCA tertile (>26) demonstrated preserved attention and inhibitory control. MoCA scores were more strongly associated with Flanker task accuracy than MMSE, particularly in the combined condition (adjusted β = 2.7 per MoCA point, p = 0.026; β = 27.2 for MoCA ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.026) versus MMSE (adjusted β = 2.8 per point, p = 0.044; β = 20.6 for MMSE ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.074). Bland–Altman analysis indicated strong agreement between Flanker and Stroop task accuracy in high-performing individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Integrating the Flanker task with MoCA may offer a more nuanced assessment of post-ICU cognitive function. This combined approach enhances detection of cognitive deficits and supports early intervention strategies in ICU recovery care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"495 ","pages":"Article 115791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flanker task assessment of inhibitory control in ICU survivors: Preliminary insights into cognitive impairment\",\"authors\":\"Li-Tsung Lin , Hui-An Lin , Chyi-Huey Bai , Sheng-Feng Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Cognitive assessment tools for ICU survivors often lack sensitivity to detect subtle impairments. This study examines whether combining standard screening instruments with computerized inhibitory control measures enhances post-ICU cognitive evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective cohort study conducted at a university-affiliated hospital, participants included ICU survivors aged ≥ 40 years, functionally independent prior to admission, and alert upon ICU discharge. Assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a computerized Flanker task evaluating response accuracy and reaction time. The Stroop task was used to validate agreement with the Flanker task.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 34 participants, median MMSE and MoCA scores were 25.5 and 24, respectively. Cognitive scores ≥ 25 were observed in 55.9 % (MMSE) and 44.1 % (MoCA). Participants in the highest MoCA tertile (>26) demonstrated preserved attention and inhibitory control. MoCA scores were more strongly associated with Flanker task accuracy than MMSE, particularly in the combined condition (adjusted β = 2.7 per MoCA point, p = 0.026; β = 27.2 for MoCA ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.026) versus MMSE (adjusted β = 2.8 per point, p = 0.044; β = 20.6 for MMSE ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.074). Bland–Altman analysis indicated strong agreement between Flanker and Stroop task accuracy in high-performing individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Integrating the Flanker task with MoCA may offer a more nuanced assessment of post-ICU cognitive function. This combined approach enhances detection of cognitive deficits and supports early intervention strategies in ICU recovery care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"495 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016643282500378X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016643282500378X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Flanker task assessment of inhibitory control in ICU survivors: Preliminary insights into cognitive impairment
Background and purpose
Cognitive assessment tools for ICU survivors often lack sensitivity to detect subtle impairments. This study examines whether combining standard screening instruments with computerized inhibitory control measures enhances post-ICU cognitive evaluation.
Methods
In this prospective cohort study conducted at a university-affiliated hospital, participants included ICU survivors aged ≥ 40 years, functionally independent prior to admission, and alert upon ICU discharge. Assessments included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and a computerized Flanker task evaluating response accuracy and reaction time. The Stroop task was used to validate agreement with the Flanker task.
Results
Among 34 participants, median MMSE and MoCA scores were 25.5 and 24, respectively. Cognitive scores ≥ 25 were observed in 55.9 % (MMSE) and 44.1 % (MoCA). Participants in the highest MoCA tertile (>26) demonstrated preserved attention and inhibitory control. MoCA scores were more strongly associated with Flanker task accuracy than MMSE, particularly in the combined condition (adjusted β = 2.7 per MoCA point, p = 0.026; β = 27.2 for MoCA ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.026) versus MMSE (adjusted β = 2.8 per point, p = 0.044; β = 20.6 for MMSE ≥ 25 vs <25, p = 0.074). Bland–Altman analysis indicated strong agreement between Flanker and Stroop task accuracy in high-performing individuals.
Conclusions
Integrating the Flanker task with MoCA may offer a more nuanced assessment of post-ICU cognitive function. This combined approach enhances detection of cognitive deficits and supports early intervention strategies in ICU recovery care.
期刊介绍:
Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.