超过30年的新生儿呼吸体外膜氧合区域计划。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ari R Joffe, Lauren Ryan, Laurance Lequier, Charlene M T Robertson
{"title":"超过30年的新生儿呼吸体外膜氧合区域计划。","authors":"Ari R Joffe, Lauren Ryan, Laurance Lequier, Charlene M T Robertson","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This referral center's prospective inception-cohort study from 1989 to 2000 (Era 1) and 2000 to 2022 (Era 2) included 232 consecutive children having neonatal respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Kindergarten-age outcomes determined in 137/139 (95.8%) survivors were Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), and sensorimotor disability, with optimal outcome defined as scores greater than or equal to 80 and without disability. In Era 2, there were fewer patients/year, fewer neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome, and more with sepsis, lethal disease, or \"other\" diagnoses. Era 2 also had higher rates of venoarterial cannulation, cannulation after the first week of life, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In survivors, there was a shift in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, and VMI to the left of population norms, with scores less than 70 in 16-40% (expected in 2.27% of the normative population), disability in 53%, and optimal outcome in 38%. Era was not independently associated with mortality, optimal outcome, or FSIQ outcomes. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) was independently associated with lower optimal outcome and FSIQ. Sensorineural hearing loss (bilateral, predominantly high-frequency, often progressive, and of delayed onset) was eliminated from Era 2, despite a concerning incidence of 40% in Era 1. Survival and neurocognitive outcomes after neonatal respiratory ECMO have not changed over 34 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Over 30 Years of Neonatal Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation From a Regional Program.\",\"authors\":\"Ari R Joffe, Lauren Ryan, Laurance Lequier, Charlene M T Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This referral center's prospective inception-cohort study from 1989 to 2000 (Era 1) and 2000 to 2022 (Era 2) included 232 consecutive children having neonatal respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Kindergarten-age outcomes determined in 137/139 (95.8%) survivors were Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), and sensorimotor disability, with optimal outcome defined as scores greater than or equal to 80 and without disability. In Era 2, there were fewer patients/year, fewer neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome, and more with sepsis, lethal disease, or \\\"other\\\" diagnoses. Era 2 also had higher rates of venoarterial cannulation, cannulation after the first week of life, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In survivors, there was a shift in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, and VMI to the left of population norms, with scores less than 70 in 16-40% (expected in 2.27% of the normative population), disability in 53%, and optimal outcome in 38%. Era was not independently associated with mortality, optimal outcome, or FSIQ outcomes. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) was independently associated with lower optimal outcome and FSIQ. Sensorineural hearing loss (bilateral, predominantly high-frequency, often progressive, and of delayed onset) was eliminated from Era 2, despite a concerning incidence of 40% in Era 1. Survival and neurocognitive outcomes after neonatal respiratory ECMO have not changed over 34 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002531\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002531","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该转诊中心从1989年至2000年(第1时代)和2000年至2022年(第2时代)进行的前瞻性起始队列研究包括232名连续接受新生儿呼吸体外膜氧合(ECMO)的儿童。137/139例(95.8%)幸存者的幼儿园阶段结局是韦氏学前和初级智力量表、Beery-Buktenica视觉-运动整合发育测验(VMI)和感觉运动障碍,最佳结局定义为得分大于或等于80且无残疾。在第2时代,每年有更少的患者,更少的新生儿出现胎粪吸入综合征,更多的是败血症、致命疾病或“其他”诊断。第2期的静脉插管率、出生后第一周插管率和体外心肺复苏率也较高。在幸存者中,全面智商(FSIQ)、语言智商、表现智商和VMI的得分都向人群标准左移,16-40%的人得分低于70分(预计在2.27%的正常人群中),53%的人残疾,38%的人达到最佳结果。Era与死亡率、最佳结果或FSIQ结果没有独立关联。先天性膈疝(CDH)与较低的最佳预后和FSIQ独立相关。感音神经性听力损失(双侧,主要是高频,通常是进行性的,延迟发作)在第2期被消除,尽管第1期的发病率约为40%。新生儿呼吸ECMO后的生存和神经认知结果在34年内没有改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Over 30 Years of Neonatal Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation From a Regional Program.

This referral center's prospective inception-cohort study from 1989 to 2000 (Era 1) and 2000 to 2022 (Era 2) included 232 consecutive children having neonatal respiratory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Kindergarten-age outcomes determined in 137/139 (95.8%) survivors were Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI), and sensorimotor disability, with optimal outcome defined as scores greater than or equal to 80 and without disability. In Era 2, there were fewer patients/year, fewer neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome, and more with sepsis, lethal disease, or "other" diagnoses. Era 2 also had higher rates of venoarterial cannulation, cannulation after the first week of life, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In survivors, there was a shift in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ), Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, and VMI to the left of population norms, with scores less than 70 in 16-40% (expected in 2.27% of the normative population), disability in 53%, and optimal outcome in 38%. Era was not independently associated with mortality, optimal outcome, or FSIQ outcomes. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (CDH) was independently associated with lower optimal outcome and FSIQ. Sensorineural hearing loss (bilateral, predominantly high-frequency, often progressive, and of delayed onset) was eliminated from Era 2, despite a concerning incidence of 40% in Era 1. Survival and neurocognitive outcomes after neonatal respiratory ECMO have not changed over 34 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信