经颅直流电刺激左背外侧前额叶皮质联合股四头肌强化运动治疗慢性膝骨关节炎的效果:一项双盲、随机、假对照试验。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Kanlayanee Boonprasit, Chernkhuan Stonsaovapak, Krisna Piravej
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激左背外侧前额叶皮质联合股四头肌强化运动治疗慢性膝骨关节炎的效果:一项双盲、随机、假对照试验。","authors":"Kanlayanee Boonprasit, Chernkhuan Stonsaovapak, Krisna Piravej","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plus exercise on pain, function, and quality of life in chronic knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thirty-two participants with chronic knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to real tDCS (anode: left DLPFC, cathode: right supraorbital, 2 mA for 20 minutes) or sham treatment, with quadriceps exercises three times weekly for four weeks. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and four weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups in any outcome after completing 12 sessions [mean difference (95% CI): VAS -0.30 (-9.49, 8.89); PPT 0.033 (-0.039, 0.105); WOMAC 4.22 (-3.35, 11.79); SF-36 - 0.44 (-6.23, 5.35)] or at follow-up [VAS 0.01 (-15.69, 15.71); PPT 0.008 (-0.113, 0.130); WOMAC 4.91 (-7.56, 17.37); SF-36 - 2.96 (-12.11, 6.20)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings showed that tDCS over the left DLPFC provided no significant additional benefit to quadriceps exercise compared to sham stimulation in improving pain, function, or quality of life in individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with quadriceps strengthening exercise in chronic knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kanlayanee Boonprasit, Chernkhuan Stonsaovapak, Krisna Piravej\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plus exercise on pain, function, and quality of life in chronic knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Thirty-two participants with chronic knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to real tDCS (anode: left DLPFC, cathode: right supraorbital, 2 mA for 20 minutes) or sham treatment, with quadriceps exercises three times weekly for four weeks. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and four weeks later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between groups in any outcome after completing 12 sessions [mean difference (95% CI): VAS -0.30 (-9.49, 8.89); PPT 0.033 (-0.039, 0.105); WOMAC 4.22 (-3.35, 11.79); SF-36 - 0.44 (-6.23, 5.35)] or at follow-up [VAS 0.01 (-15.69, 15.71); PPT 0.008 (-0.113, 0.130); WOMAC 4.91 (-7.56, 17.37); SF-36 - 2.96 (-12.11, 6.20)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings showed that tDCS over the left DLPFC provided no significant additional benefit to quadriceps exercise compared to sham stimulation in improving pain, function, or quality of life in individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)加运动对慢性膝骨关节炎患者疼痛、功能和生活质量的影响。设计:32名慢性膝骨关节炎患者被随机分配到真正的tDCS组(正极:左侧DLPFC,正极:右侧眶上,2 mA,持续20分钟)或假治疗组,每周进行3次股四头肌锻炼,持续四周。在基线、治疗后和四周后分别评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、压痛阈值(PPT)、西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)和简短健康调查-36 (SF-36)。结果:在完成12个疗程后,各组之间的任何结果均无显著差异[平均差异(95% CI): VAS -0.30 (-9.49, 8.89);PPT 0.033 (-0.039, 0.105);Womac 4.22 (-3.35, 11.79);SF-36 - 0.44(-6.23, 5.35)或随访时[VAS 0.01 (-15.69, 15.71)];PPT 0.008 (-0.113, 0.130);Womac 4.91 (-7.56, 17.37);Sf-36 - 2.96(-12.11, 6.20)]。结论:研究结果表明,与假刺激相比,在改善慢性膝骨关节炎患者的疼痛、功能或生活质量方面,左DLPFC上的tDCS对股四头肌运动没有显著的额外益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with quadriceps strengthening exercise in chronic knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Objective: To study the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) plus exercise on pain, function, and quality of life in chronic knee osteoarthritis.

Design: Thirty-two participants with chronic knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to real tDCS (anode: left DLPFC, cathode: right supraorbital, 2 mA for 20 minutes) or sham treatment, with quadriceps exercises three times weekly for four weeks. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), pressure pain threshold (PPT), and the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36), were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and four weeks later.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups in any outcome after completing 12 sessions [mean difference (95% CI): VAS -0.30 (-9.49, 8.89); PPT 0.033 (-0.039, 0.105); WOMAC 4.22 (-3.35, 11.79); SF-36 - 0.44 (-6.23, 5.35)] or at follow-up [VAS 0.01 (-15.69, 15.71); PPT 0.008 (-0.113, 0.130); WOMAC 4.91 (-7.56, 17.37); SF-36 - 2.96 (-12.11, 6.20)].

Conclusions: The findings showed that tDCS over the left DLPFC provided no significant additional benefit to quadriceps exercise compared to sham stimulation in improving pain, function, or quality of life in individuals with chronic knee osteoarthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信