医疗保健信息系统数据挖掘压力损伤预测指标系统的开发:顺序混合方法研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000350
Chunxiang Qin, Siqing Hu, Jing Lu, Wei Liang, Wang Huang, Jiaying Xie, Lihong Zeng, Binqian Zhou, Jiangming Sheng
{"title":"医疗保健信息系统数据挖掘压力损伤预测指标系统的开发:顺序混合方法研究。","authors":"Chunxiang Qin, Siqing Hu, Jing Lu, Wei Liang, Wang Huang, Jiaying Xie, Lihong Zeng, Binqian Zhou, Jiangming Sheng","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI), as a critical measurement of medical care quality, has shown an upward trend. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive indicators of potential PIs and ensure that the predictive indicators can automatically be mined from electronic medical record systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methods include 2 parts. One is the modified Delphi for indicator development, including clinical health care provider interviews, literature review, research group meetings, and Delphi survey. The other is feature selection, including extracting indicators from the health care information system (HIS) by structured query language and selecting indicators using the Random Forest technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A predictive indicator system (with feature extraction rules for each indicator) consisting of 3 categories and 14 indicators was constructed. The experts' consensus was reached on all indicators (mean=4.28±0.65 to 4.94±0.23; coefficient of variation=4.63% to 17.20%; agreement rate=83.30% to 100.00%). The agreement between manual extraction and the computer's automatic extraction was good, with a Cohen κ score of 0.64 to 1.00. The accuracy of the good parsimonious prediction model was 95.26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This predictive indicator system is prepared for automatic PI prediction in the HIS. Many revisions should be conducted in further studies and practices in a real-life medical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":" ","pages":"E90-E97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Pressure Injury Predictive Indicator System for Data Mining in Health Care Information Systems: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chunxiang Qin, Siqing Hu, Jing Lu, Wei Liang, Wang Huang, Jiaying Xie, Lihong Zeng, Binqian Zhou, Jiangming Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000350\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI), as a critical measurement of medical care quality, has shown an upward trend. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive indicators of potential PIs and ensure that the predictive indicators can automatically be mined from electronic medical record systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The methods include 2 parts. One is the modified Delphi for indicator development, including clinical health care provider interviews, literature review, research group meetings, and Delphi survey. The other is feature selection, including extracting indicators from the health care information system (HIS) by structured query language and selecting indicators using the Random Forest technique.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A predictive indicator system (with feature extraction rules for each indicator) consisting of 3 categories and 14 indicators was constructed. The experts' consensus was reached on all indicators (mean=4.28±0.65 to 4.94±0.23; coefficient of variation=4.63% to 17.20%; agreement rate=83.30% to 100.00%). The agreement between manual extraction and the computer's automatic extraction was good, with a Cohen κ score of 0.64 to 1.00. The accuracy of the good parsimonious prediction model was 95.26%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This predictive indicator system is prepared for automatic PI prediction in the HIS. Many revisions should be conducted in further studies and practices in a real-life medical environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E90-E97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Skin & Wound Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000350\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医院获得性压力损伤(PI)作为衡量医疗服务质量的重要指标,其发生率呈上升趋势。本研究的目的是确定潜在pi的预测指标,并确保预测指标可以自动从电子病历系统中挖掘。方法:方法包括2部分。一种是采用改良德尔菲法制定指标,包括临床卫生保健提供者访谈、文献回顾、研究组会议和德尔菲调查。二是特征选择,包括利用结构化查询语言从医疗信息系统(HIS)中提取指标,并利用随机森林技术选择指标。结果:构建了一个由3大类14个指标组成的预测指标体系(每个指标都有特征提取规则)。各指标专家意见一致(平均值=4.28±0.65 ~ 4.94±0.23,变异系数=4.63% ~ 17.20%,符合率=83.30% ~ 100.00%)。人工提取与计算机自动提取的一致性较好,Cohen κ分数为0.64 ~ 1.00。良好的简约预测模型准确率为95.26%。结论:该预测指标体系为HIS的PI自动预测奠定了基础。在现实医疗环境的进一步研究和实践中,还需要进行许多修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Pressure Injury Predictive Indicator System for Data Mining in Health Care Information Systems: A Sequential Mixed-Methods Study.

Objective: Prevalence of hospital-acquired pressure injury (PI), as a critical measurement of medical care quality, has shown an upward trend. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive indicators of potential PIs and ensure that the predictive indicators can automatically be mined from electronic medical record systems.

Methods: The methods include 2 parts. One is the modified Delphi for indicator development, including clinical health care provider interviews, literature review, research group meetings, and Delphi survey. The other is feature selection, including extracting indicators from the health care information system (HIS) by structured query language and selecting indicators using the Random Forest technique.

Results: A predictive indicator system (with feature extraction rules for each indicator) consisting of 3 categories and 14 indicators was constructed. The experts' consensus was reached on all indicators (mean=4.28±0.65 to 4.94±0.23; coefficient of variation=4.63% to 17.20%; agreement rate=83.30% to 100.00%). The agreement between manual extraction and the computer's automatic extraction was good, with a Cohen κ score of 0.64 to 1.00. The accuracy of the good parsimonious prediction model was 95.26%.

Conclusions: This predictive indicator system is prepared for automatic PI prediction in the HIS. Many revisions should be conducted in further studies and practices in a real-life medical environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信