端粒长度测量的远程血液采集:评估样品特性和处理对DNA质量和分析结果的影响

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Quinn A. Conklin, Dana L. Smith, Guorui Dai, Brandon G. King, Clifford D. Saron, Jue Lin
{"title":"端粒长度测量的远程血液采集:评估样品特性和处理对DNA质量和分析结果的影响","authors":"Quinn A. Conklin,&nbsp;Dana L. Smith,&nbsp;Guorui Dai,&nbsp;Brandon G. King,&nbsp;Clifford D. Saron,&nbsp;Jue Lin","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.70128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Telomere length (TL) is a valuable marker of aging and stress that reflects both genetic and environmental influences. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) TL measurement is a powerful and cost-effective assay, especially in population studies with limited quantities of source material. Nevertheless, collecting and transporting high-quality blood samples can be logistically challenging, and research suggests that several preanalytical and analytical factors can influence the reliability and precision of the qPCR assay. Here we describe a procedure for collecting blood remotely in a large-scale study. We then assess the influence of various features of the samples, as well as their collection, transportation, and storage on DNA quality and TL assay outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Participants used at-home collection kits to collect a few drops of whole blood in BD Microtainers during a baseline (<i>n</i> = 265) and 1-year follow-up (<i>n</i> = 178) assessment. DNA was extracted using a magnetic-bead method, and DNA yield, purity, and integrity were assessed. TL was measured using qPCR. To assess inter-assay variation, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated across repeated TL measurements (three runs) for each sample. When there was adequate material for duplicate extractions of DNA from the same blood samples, we calculated the intra-class correlation (ICC) of the resultant TL values to assess assay precision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analyses revealed that as little as 50 μL of blood yielded sufficient DNA for highly precise TL measurement (ICC = 0.962, <i>n</i> = 365). Transportation time and an additional year of storage time at −80°C did not meaningfully affect DNA quality or assay outcomes. However, blood clotting was associated with longer telomere estimates, whereas greater temperature exposure was related to shorter telomere estimates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We established that whole blood collected remotely in BD Microtainers can provide a valid sample source for qPCR TL measurement. We also outline important logistical considerations related to sample collection and handling and provide recommendations for researchers who want to use this method.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50809,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Human Biology","volume":"37 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajhb.70128","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Blood Collection for Telomere Length Measurement: Assessing the Impact of Sample Characteristics and Handling on DNA Quality and Assay Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Quinn A. Conklin,&nbsp;Dana L. Smith,&nbsp;Guorui Dai,&nbsp;Brandon G. King,&nbsp;Clifford D. Saron,&nbsp;Jue Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajhb.70128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Telomere length (TL) is a valuable marker of aging and stress that reflects both genetic and environmental influences. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) TL measurement is a powerful and cost-effective assay, especially in population studies with limited quantities of source material. Nevertheless, collecting and transporting high-quality blood samples can be logistically challenging, and research suggests that several preanalytical and analytical factors can influence the reliability and precision of the qPCR assay. Here we describe a procedure for collecting blood remotely in a large-scale study. We then assess the influence of various features of the samples, as well as their collection, transportation, and storage on DNA quality and TL assay outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants used at-home collection kits to collect a few drops of whole blood in BD Microtainers during a baseline (<i>n</i> = 265) and 1-year follow-up (<i>n</i> = 178) assessment. DNA was extracted using a magnetic-bead method, and DNA yield, purity, and integrity were assessed. TL was measured using qPCR. To assess inter-assay variation, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated across repeated TL measurements (three runs) for each sample. When there was adequate material for duplicate extractions of DNA from the same blood samples, we calculated the intra-class correlation (ICC) of the resultant TL values to assess assay precision.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our analyses revealed that as little as 50 μL of blood yielded sufficient DNA for highly precise TL measurement (ICC = 0.962, <i>n</i> = 365). Transportation time and an additional year of storage time at −80°C did not meaningfully affect DNA quality or assay outcomes. However, blood clotting was associated with longer telomere estimates, whereas greater temperature exposure was related to shorter telomere estimates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We established that whole blood collected remotely in BD Microtainers can provide a valid sample source for qPCR TL measurement. We also outline important logistical considerations related to sample collection and handling and provide recommendations for researchers who want to use this method.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"37 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajhb.70128\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.70128\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.70128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

端粒长度(TL)是反映遗传和环境影响的衰老和应激的重要标志。定量PCR (qPCR) TL测定是一种强大且具有成本效益的测定方法,特别是在源材料数量有限的人群研究中。然而,收集和运输高质量的血液样本在后勤上具有挑战性,研究表明,一些分析前和分析因素会影响qPCR测定的可靠性和准确性。在这里,我们描述了一种在大规模研究中远程采集血液的程序。然后,我们评估了样品的各种特征,以及它们的收集、运输和储存对DNA质量和TL分析结果的影响。方法参与者在基线(n = 265)和1年随访(n = 178)评估期间使用家庭采集试剂盒在BD microtainer中采集几滴全血。采用磁珠法提取DNA,评估DNA产率、纯度和完整性。采用qPCR检测TL。为了评估测定间的差异,对每个样品进行重复TL测量(三次运行),计算变异系数(CV)。当有足够的材料从相同的血液样本中重复提取DNA时,我们计算所得TL值的类内相关性(ICC)以评估测定精度。结果我们的分析显示,50 μL的血液就能产生足够的DNA,用于高精度的TL测定(ICC = 0.962, n = 365)。运输时间和在- 80°C下额外储存一年的时间对DNA质量或检测结果没有显著影响。然而,凝血与较长的端粒估计有关,而较高的温度暴露与较短的端粒估计有关。结论BD微容器远程采集的全血可作为qPCR TL检测的有效样本来源。我们还概述了与样品收集和处理相关的重要后勤考虑因素,并为想要使用这种方法的研究人员提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Remote Blood Collection for Telomere Length Measurement: Assessing the Impact of Sample Characteristics and Handling on DNA Quality and Assay Outcomes

Remote Blood Collection for Telomere Length Measurement: Assessing the Impact of Sample Characteristics and Handling on DNA Quality and Assay Outcomes

Background

Telomere length (TL) is a valuable marker of aging and stress that reflects both genetic and environmental influences. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) TL measurement is a powerful and cost-effective assay, especially in population studies with limited quantities of source material. Nevertheless, collecting and transporting high-quality blood samples can be logistically challenging, and research suggests that several preanalytical and analytical factors can influence the reliability and precision of the qPCR assay. Here we describe a procedure for collecting blood remotely in a large-scale study. We then assess the influence of various features of the samples, as well as their collection, transportation, and storage on DNA quality and TL assay outcomes.

Method

Participants used at-home collection kits to collect a few drops of whole blood in BD Microtainers during a baseline (n = 265) and 1-year follow-up (n = 178) assessment. DNA was extracted using a magnetic-bead method, and DNA yield, purity, and integrity were assessed. TL was measured using qPCR. To assess inter-assay variation, the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated across repeated TL measurements (three runs) for each sample. When there was adequate material for duplicate extractions of DNA from the same blood samples, we calculated the intra-class correlation (ICC) of the resultant TL values to assess assay precision.

Results

Our analyses revealed that as little as 50 μL of blood yielded sufficient DNA for highly precise TL measurement (ICC = 0.962, n = 365). Transportation time and an additional year of storage time at −80°C did not meaningfully affect DNA quality or assay outcomes. However, blood clotting was associated with longer telomere estimates, whereas greater temperature exposure was related to shorter telomere estimates.

Conclusions

We established that whole blood collected remotely in BD Microtainers can provide a valid sample source for qPCR TL measurement. We also outline important logistical considerations related to sample collection and handling and provide recommendations for researchers who want to use this method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Human Biology is the Official Journal of the Human Biology Association. The American Journal of Human Biology is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed, internationally circulated journal that publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles and timely reviews, and brief communications in the interdisciplinary field of human biology. As the official journal of the Human Biology Association, the Journal also publishes abstracts of research presented at its annual scientific meeting and book reviews relevant to the field. The Journal seeks scholarly manuscripts that address all aspects of human biology, health, and disease, particularly those that stress comparative, developmental, ecological, or evolutionary perspectives. The transdisciplinary areas covered in the Journal include, but are not limited to, epidemiology, genetic variation, population biology and demography, physiology, anatomy, nutrition, growth and aging, physical performance, physical activity and fitness, ecology, and evolution, along with their interactions. The Journal publishes basic, applied, and methodologically oriented research from all areas, including measurement, analytical techniques and strategies, and computer applications in human biology. Like many other biologically oriented disciplines, the field of human biology has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years, and the expansion of the aims and scope of the Journal is a reflection of this growth and membership diversification. The Journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscripts of unusual interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信