Kun-Jun Han, Montgomery W. Alison, Bisoondat Macoon, Lisa M. Fultz, Paola C. Muela Negrete, Abiola Bruce-Smith, William D. Pitman
{"title":"暖季多年生牧草的覆盖作物或饲料作用","authors":"Kun-Jun Han, Montgomery W. Alison, Bisoondat Macoon, Lisa M. Fultz, Paola C. Muela Negrete, Abiola Bruce-Smith, William D. Pitman","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over-seeded annual grasses and legumes, which can provide forage on dormant perennial warm-season grass pastures, serve as cover crops on fallow cropland. Although erosion control is not a typical need for pastures with perennial grass sod, cover crops functioning as catch crops to reduce cool-season nutrient loss or legumes for N fixation could contribute to reduced-cost warm-season pasture growth. Treatments of over-seeded cool-season species and management evaluating effects of cover crop removal as forage versus mulched as a N source were evaluated at three locations in 3 years. Cool-season legumes produced more biomass N than cool-season grasses, indicating biological N contributions of the legumes. Nitrogen limitation of the less productive, non-fertilized grasses indicates that readily available soil N had been depleted, limiting N leaching. Despite mulching of legume biomass with N amounts of 45–89 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, biomass production of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers.] in the following growing season was not increased. Lack of benefit of cover crop N contributions to subsequent bermudagrass forage production indicates that the availability of increased soil N was not synchronized with periods of efficient bermudagrass N uptake. These unanticipated results appear to be due to the effect of N mineralization-immobilization processes on N availability combined with variable rates of bermudagrass growth in response to periodic moisture limitations in this warm, humid, but uncertain environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Over-seeded cool-season annuals for cover crop or forage roles in warm-season perennial grass pastures\",\"authors\":\"Kun-Jun Han, Montgomery W. Alison, Bisoondat Macoon, Lisa M. Fultz, Paola C. Muela Negrete, Abiola Bruce-Smith, William D. Pitman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Over-seeded annual grasses and legumes, which can provide forage on dormant perennial warm-season grass pastures, serve as cover crops on fallow cropland. Although erosion control is not a typical need for pastures with perennial grass sod, cover crops functioning as catch crops to reduce cool-season nutrient loss or legumes for N fixation could contribute to reduced-cost warm-season pasture growth. Treatments of over-seeded cool-season species and management evaluating effects of cover crop removal as forage versus mulched as a N source were evaluated at three locations in 3 years. Cool-season legumes produced more biomass N than cool-season grasses, indicating biological N contributions of the legumes. Nitrogen limitation of the less productive, non-fertilized grasses indicates that readily available soil N had been depleted, limiting N leaching. Despite mulching of legume biomass with N amounts of 45–89 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>, biomass production of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers.] in the following growing season was not increased. Lack of benefit of cover crop N contributions to subsequent bermudagrass forage production indicates that the availability of increased soil N was not synchronized with periods of efficient bermudagrass N uptake. These unanticipated results appear to be due to the effect of N mineralization-immobilization processes on N availability combined with variable rates of bermudagrass growth in response to periodic moisture limitations in this warm, humid, but uncertain environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
过量播种的一年生禾本科和豆科植物在常年休眠的暖季牧草牧场上提供牧草,在休耕地上作为覆盖作物。虽然侵蚀控制不是多年生草皮牧场的典型需求,但覆盖作物作为捕获作物减少冷季养分损失或豆科植物固定氮可能有助于降低暖季牧草生长的成本。在3年的时间里,在3个地点对冷季种过量播种的处理和覆盖作物去除作为饲料与覆盖作为氮源的管理效果进行了评价。冷季豆科植物比冷季禾本科植物产生更多的生物量氮,说明了豆科植物对氮的生物贡献。产量较低、未施肥的禾草的氮素限制表明,可利用的土壤氮已经耗尽,限制了氮的淋溶。尽管豆科植物生物量覆盖氮量为45-89 kg ha - 1,但百草生物量产量[Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers.]]在接下来的生长季节中没有增加。覆盖作物氮对随后的百慕草饲料生产的贡献缺乏效益,表明土壤氮的有效性增加与百慕草氮的有效吸收期不同步。这些意想不到的结果似乎是由于N矿化-固定化过程对N有效性的影响,以及在这种温暖、潮湿但不确定的环境中,百慕大草生长速度的变化对周期性水分限制的响应。
Over-seeded cool-season annuals for cover crop or forage roles in warm-season perennial grass pastures
Over-seeded annual grasses and legumes, which can provide forage on dormant perennial warm-season grass pastures, serve as cover crops on fallow cropland. Although erosion control is not a typical need for pastures with perennial grass sod, cover crops functioning as catch crops to reduce cool-season nutrient loss or legumes for N fixation could contribute to reduced-cost warm-season pasture growth. Treatments of over-seeded cool-season species and management evaluating effects of cover crop removal as forage versus mulched as a N source were evaluated at three locations in 3 years. Cool-season legumes produced more biomass N than cool-season grasses, indicating biological N contributions of the legumes. Nitrogen limitation of the less productive, non-fertilized grasses indicates that readily available soil N had been depleted, limiting N leaching. Despite mulching of legume biomass with N amounts of 45–89 kg ha−1, biomass production of bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L) Pers.] in the following growing season was not increased. Lack of benefit of cover crop N contributions to subsequent bermudagrass forage production indicates that the availability of increased soil N was not synchronized with periods of efficient bermudagrass N uptake. These unanticipated results appear to be due to the effect of N mineralization-immobilization processes on N availability combined with variable rates of bermudagrass growth in response to periodic moisture limitations in this warm, humid, but uncertain environment.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.