定制和库存锥形-六角基台的200万次疲劳性能:去除扭矩和扫描电镜研究

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Furkan Selvi, Berk Bilgen, Meltem Özdemir Karataş, Ali Balık
{"title":"定制和库存锥形-六角基台的200万次疲劳性能:去除扭矩和扫描电镜研究","authors":"Furkan Selvi,&nbsp;Berk Bilgen,&nbsp;Meltem Özdemir Karataş,&nbsp;Ali Balık","doi":"10.1111/cid.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Screw loosening remains a frequent mechanical complication in implant-supported prostheses, primarily caused by the gradual loss of abutment-screw preload. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance of CAD-CAM custom and stock abutments by measuring removal torque values (RTV) at multiple time points and assessing surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), following prolonged loading up to 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Forty-four implant-abutment assemblies with an internal conical-hex connection were divided into two groups: Stock abutments (SA) and custom abutments (CA). After initial tightening, baseline RTVs were recorded. The samples underwent cyclic loading following ISO-14801 standards. RTVs were measured after 50 000, 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 1.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles and after post-fatigue re-tightening. SEM analysis was performed at baseline, after 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Baseline RTVs were higher in SA than CA. Both groups exhibited a progressive decrease in RTVs until 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles, with significantly lower values in the CA. Thereafter, a partial recovery was observed up to 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles, with no significant difference between groups. SEM images revealed more extensive surface wear in the SA group, while the CA group demonstrated localized adaptations; however, thread integrity was maintained in all samples.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Custom abutments showed lower baseline removal-torque values yet maintained preload as effectively as stock abutments after two-million cycles, confirming the mechanical suitability of both designs for functional loading. The greatest preload loss occurred between 50 000 and 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles; therefore, retightening the abutment screws during the early post-insertion period is recommended to maintain preload stability.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Million Cycle Fatigue Performance of Custom and Stock Conical-Hex Abutments: A Removal Torque and SEM Study\",\"authors\":\"Furkan Selvi,&nbsp;Berk Bilgen,&nbsp;Meltem Özdemir Karataş,&nbsp;Ali Balık\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.70087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Screw loosening remains a frequent mechanical complication in implant-supported prostheses, primarily caused by the gradual loss of abutment-screw preload. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance of CAD-CAM custom and stock abutments by measuring removal torque values (RTV) at multiple time points and assessing surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), following prolonged loading up to 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Forty-four implant-abutment assemblies with an internal conical-hex connection were divided into two groups: Stock abutments (SA) and custom abutments (CA). After initial tightening, baseline RTVs were recorded. The samples underwent cyclic loading following ISO-14801 standards. RTVs were measured after 50 000, 1 × 10<sup>6</sup>, 1.5 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles and after post-fatigue re-tightening. SEM analysis was performed at baseline, after 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> and 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Baseline RTVs were higher in SA than CA. Both groups exhibited a progressive decrease in RTVs until 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles, with significantly lower values in the CA. Thereafter, a partial recovery was observed up to 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles, with no significant difference between groups. SEM images revealed more extensive surface wear in the SA group, while the CA group demonstrated localized adaptations; however, thread integrity was maintained in all samples.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Custom abutments showed lower baseline removal-torque values yet maintained preload as effectively as stock abutments after two-million cycles, confirming the mechanical suitability of both designs for functional loading. The greatest preload loss occurred between 50 000 and 1 × 10<sup>6</sup> cycles; therefore, retightening the abutment screws during the early post-insertion period is recommended to maintain preload stability.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

螺钉松动仍然是种植体支持的假体中常见的机械并发症,主要是由基台螺钉预紧力逐渐丧失引起的。本研究的目的是通过测量多个时间点的移除扭矩值(RTV)和通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估表面形貌,评估CAD-CAM定制和库存基台在长时间加载高达2 × 106次循环后的力学性能。方法将44例种植体-基台内锥体-六角连接组分为常规基台组(SA)和定制基台组(CA)。初始收紧后,记录基线rtv。试样按照ISO-14801标准进行循环加载。分别在5万次、1 × 106次、1.5 × 106次和2 × 106次循环以及疲劳后再拧紧后测量rtv。在基线、1 × 106和2 × 106周期后进行扫描电镜分析。结果SA组的基线rtv高于CA组。两组rtv均逐渐下降至1 × 106周期,CA组的rtv值显著降低。此后,部分恢复至2 × 106周期,组间无显著差异。扫描电镜图像显示,SA组表面磨损更广泛,而CA组表现出局部适应;然而,在所有样品中都保持了线程完整性。结论:在200万次循环后,自定义基台具有较低的基线移除扭矩值,但与库存基台一样有效地保持预载荷,证实了两种设计在功能载荷方面的机械适用性。预载损失最大的时段为5万~ 1 × 106次循环;因此,建议在插入后早期重新拧紧基台螺钉,以保持预紧力的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Million Cycle Fatigue Performance of Custom and Stock Conical-Hex Abutments: A Removal Torque and SEM Study

Introduction

Screw loosening remains a frequent mechanical complication in implant-supported prostheses, primarily caused by the gradual loss of abutment-screw preload. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance of CAD-CAM custom and stock abutments by measuring removal torque values (RTV) at multiple time points and assessing surface morphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), following prolonged loading up to 2 × 106 cycles.

Methods

Forty-four implant-abutment assemblies with an internal conical-hex connection were divided into two groups: Stock abutments (SA) and custom abutments (CA). After initial tightening, baseline RTVs were recorded. The samples underwent cyclic loading following ISO-14801 standards. RTVs were measured after 50 000, 1 × 106, 1.5 × 106 and 2 × 106 cycles and after post-fatigue re-tightening. SEM analysis was performed at baseline, after 1 × 106 and 2 × 106 cycles.

Results

Baseline RTVs were higher in SA than CA. Both groups exhibited a progressive decrease in RTVs until 1 × 106 cycles, with significantly lower values in the CA. Thereafter, a partial recovery was observed up to 2 × 106 cycles, with no significant difference between groups. SEM images revealed more extensive surface wear in the SA group, while the CA group demonstrated localized adaptations; however, thread integrity was maintained in all samples.

Conclusion

Custom abutments showed lower baseline removal-torque values yet maintained preload as effectively as stock abutments after two-million cycles, confirming the mechanical suitability of both designs for functional loading. The greatest preload loss occurred between 50 000 and 1 × 106 cycles; therefore, retightening the abutment screws during the early post-insertion period is recommended to maintain preload stability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信