Priyanka Kar, Suman Talukder, A. K. Biswas, A. R. Sen, R. K. Agrawal, P. Kumar
{"title":"经典实验室技术区分肉鸡肉与屠宰和死禽有效检测肉类掺假","authors":"Priyanka Kar, Suman Talukder, A. K. Biswas, A. R. Sen, R. K. Agrawal, P. Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s12161-025-02865-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To achieve unscrupulous economic gain, some chicken meat retailers use dead broiler chickens to replace the meat from properly slaughtered birds, which may lead to severe health consequences for the chicken meat consumers. This study was undertaken to differentiate the quality attributes of chicken from dead and slaughtered broiler birds to judge the substitution. Therefore, slaughtered, dead, and a mix of the both samples were comparatively evaluated for different quality parameters. Results showed a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in water holding capacity, extract release volume, drip loss, total pigments, myoglobin content, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, total volatile basic nitrogen, myoglobin content, and L-lactate among the chicken meat samples. The malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix samples based on the available residual blood in them. The color parameters (redness, chroma) and histopathological parameters could also differentiate slaughtered, dead, and admixture samples. The sensory scores were higher for the dead than for both slaughtered and mix samples. Higher microbial counts were (<i>p</i> < 0.05) observed in dead samples as compared to others. On the basis of the findings, we could conclude that the physicochemical, histopathological, microbiological evaluation, and malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix chicken samples.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 10","pages":"2291 - 2303"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical Laboratory Techniques to Distinguish Broiler Chicken Meat from Slaughtered and Dead Birds for Effective Detection of Meat Adulteration\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Kar, Suman Talukder, A. K. Biswas, A. R. Sen, R. K. Agrawal, P. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-025-02865-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To achieve unscrupulous economic gain, some chicken meat retailers use dead broiler chickens to replace the meat from properly slaughtered birds, which may lead to severe health consequences for the chicken meat consumers. This study was undertaken to differentiate the quality attributes of chicken from dead and slaughtered broiler birds to judge the substitution. Therefore, slaughtered, dead, and a mix of the both samples were comparatively evaluated for different quality parameters. Results showed a significant difference (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in water holding capacity, extract release volume, drip loss, total pigments, myoglobin content, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, total volatile basic nitrogen, myoglobin content, and L-lactate among the chicken meat samples. The malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix samples based on the available residual blood in them. The color parameters (redness, chroma) and histopathological parameters could also differentiate slaughtered, dead, and admixture samples. The sensory scores were higher for the dead than for both slaughtered and mix samples. Higher microbial counts were (<i>p</i> < 0.05) observed in dead samples as compared to others. On the basis of the findings, we could conclude that the physicochemical, histopathological, microbiological evaluation, and malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix chicken samples.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"2291 - 2303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02865-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02865-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classical Laboratory Techniques to Distinguish Broiler Chicken Meat from Slaughtered and Dead Birds for Effective Detection of Meat Adulteration
To achieve unscrupulous economic gain, some chicken meat retailers use dead broiler chickens to replace the meat from properly slaughtered birds, which may lead to severe health consequences for the chicken meat consumers. This study was undertaken to differentiate the quality attributes of chicken from dead and slaughtered broiler birds to judge the substitution. Therefore, slaughtered, dead, and a mix of the both samples were comparatively evaluated for different quality parameters. Results showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in water holding capacity, extract release volume, drip loss, total pigments, myoglobin content, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, total volatile basic nitrogen, myoglobin content, and L-lactate among the chicken meat samples. The malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix samples based on the available residual blood in them. The color parameters (redness, chroma) and histopathological parameters could also differentiate slaughtered, dead, and admixture samples. The sensory scores were higher for the dead than for both slaughtered and mix samples. Higher microbial counts were (p < 0.05) observed in dead samples as compared to others. On the basis of the findings, we could conclude that the physicochemical, histopathological, microbiological evaluation, and malachite green test could efficiently differentiate the slaughtered, dead, and mix chicken samples.
期刊介绍:
Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.