{"title":"基于贝叶斯优化RUSBoost模型的滑坡易感性评价——以三峡库区为例","authors":"Runze Wu, Dehui Li, Hongbo Mei, Zhenhua Li, Xudong Hu, Weibing Qin","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of landslide susceptibility based on Bayes-optimized RUSBoost model—taking the three Gorges Reservoir area as an example\",\"authors\":\"Runze Wu, Dehui Li, Hongbo Mei, Zhenhua Li, Xudong Hu, Weibing Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"84 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of landslide susceptibility based on Bayes-optimized RUSBoost model—taking the three Gorges Reservoir area as an example
Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.
期刊介绍:
Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces:
• the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations;
• the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change;
• the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses;
• the prediction of changes to the above properties with time;
• the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.