基于贝叶斯优化RUSBoost模型的滑坡易感性评价——以三峡库区为例

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Runze Wu, Dehui Li, Hongbo Mei, Zhenhua Li, Xudong Hu, Weibing Qin
{"title":"基于贝叶斯优化RUSBoost模型的滑坡易感性评价——以三峡库区为例","authors":"Runze Wu,&nbsp;Dehui Li,&nbsp;Hongbo Mei,&nbsp;Zhenhua Li,&nbsp;Xudong Hu,&nbsp;Weibing Qin","doi":"10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":500,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","volume":"84 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of landslide susceptibility based on Bayes-optimized RUSBoost model—taking the three Gorges Reservoir area as an example\",\"authors\":\"Runze Wu,&nbsp;Dehui Li,&nbsp;Hongbo Mei,&nbsp;Zhenhua Li,&nbsp;Xudong Hu,&nbsp;Weibing Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"84 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10064-025-04436-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡易感性评价是政府制定预防和减轻滑坡灾害战略的重要手段。滑坡易感性图通常是利用滑坡模型编制的,以区分可能发生的滑坡。建立滑坡易感性评价模型,提高评价结果的可靠性是十分必要的。然而,由于滑坡在现实场景中是一个少数类别,滑坡样本的数量远远少于非滑坡样本,导致样本类别的显着不平衡。样本类失衡会降低滑坡易感性评估的准确性和可靠性,这是易感性评估建模中常见的问题。针对滑坡敏感性模型中样本类不平衡的问题,提出了一种新的滑坡敏感性模型RUSBoost。此外,采用贝叶斯优化方法提高RUSBoost模型的性能。以三峡库区为例,对该方法进行了验证。为了比较不同模型在面对样本类别失衡问题时的表现,实验中使用了决策树(auc = 0.752)、随机森林(auc = 0.813)、RUSBoost (auc = 0.828)和Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845)。除了ROC之外,Bayes-RUSBoost在专注于正类(滑坡)的模型评价指标上也表现出最好的性能,精度(0.889),召回率(0.804)和F1得分(0.844)。结果表明,经贝叶斯优化后的RUSBoost模型在滑坡易感性评价中取得了较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of landslide susceptibility based on Bayes-optimized RUSBoost model—taking the three Gorges Reservoir area as an example

Landslide susceptibility assessment serves as a key measure for government institutions to develop strategies for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards. Landslide susceptibility maps are usually prepared using landslide models to distinguish the possible occurrence of landslides. Constructing landslide models for susceptibility assessment and improving the reliability of results is necessary. However, due to landslides being a minority class in real-world scenarios, the number of landslide samples is much fewer than non-landslide samples, leading to a significant imbalance in sample classes. Sample class imbalance may reduce the accuracy and reliability of landslide susceptibility assessments, which is a common issue in susceptibility assessment modeling. In this paper, a novel model named RUSBoost is proposed for solving the issue of sample class imbalance in landslide susceptibility modelling. Furthermore, Bayesian optimization is employed to enhance the performance of the RUSBoost model. The proposed method is verified by taking the Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example. To compare the performance of different models when confronting the issue of sample class imbalance, decision tree (auc = 0.752), random forest (auc = 0.813), RUSBoost (auc = 0.828) and Bayes-RUSBoost (auc = 0.845) were used in experiments. In addition to ROC, Bayes-RUSBoost also demonstrates the best performance on model evaluation metrics focusing on the positive class (landslide), with precision (0.889), recall (0.804) and F1 score (0.844). Results indicate that the RUSBoost model, after Bayes optimization, achieved promising performance in landslide susceptibility assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
11.90%
发文量
445
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Engineering geology is defined in the statutes of the IAEG as the science devoted to the investigation, study and solution of engineering and environmental problems which may arise as the result of the interaction between geology and the works or activities of man, as well as of the prediction of and development of measures for the prevention or remediation of geological hazards. Engineering geology embraces: • the applications/implications of the geomorphology, structural geology, and hydrogeological conditions of geological formations; • the characterisation of the mineralogical, physico-geomechanical, chemical and hydraulic properties of all earth materials involved in construction, resource recovery and environmental change; • the assessment of the mechanical and hydrological behaviour of soil and rock masses; • the prediction of changes to the above properties with time; • the determination of the parameters to be considered in the stability analysis of engineering works and earth masses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信