社区居住老年人内在能力和虚弱的组合及其与自评健康的关系

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Daijo Shiratsuchi, Hyuma Makizako, Shoma Akaida, Yuto Miyake, Ryoji Kiyama, Takayuki Tabira, Mana Tateishi, Rei Otsuka, Toshihiro Takenaka, Takuro Kubozono, Mitsuru Ohishi
{"title":"社区居住老年人内在能力和虚弱的组合及其与自评健康的关系","authors":"Daijo Shiratsuchi,&nbsp;Hyuma Makizako,&nbsp;Shoma Akaida,&nbsp;Yuto Miyake,&nbsp;Ryoji Kiyama,&nbsp;Takayuki Tabira,&nbsp;Mana Tateishi,&nbsp;Rei Otsuka,&nbsp;Toshihiro Takenaka,&nbsp;Takuro Kubozono,&nbsp;Mitsuru Ohishi","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <span>AbstractSection</span>\n Background\n <p>Intrinsic capacity (IC) and frailty are distinct but complementary frameworks for understanding the heterogeneity of aging. Although both have been linked to self-rated health, little is known about how their combined status relates to older adults’ health perceptions. This cross-sectional study investigated how combinations of IC and frailty status were associated with self-rated health among community-dwelling older adults.</p>\n \n <span>AbstractSection</span>\n Method\n <p>Data from 593 participants (mean age: 73.9 years, female: 62.2%) in the 2019 Tarumizu Study were analyzed. <i>IC was evaluated across five key screening domains (cognition</i>,<i> vitality</i>,<i> sensory</i>,<i> locomotion</i>,<i> and psychological) using a 10-point scale</i>, with scores ≥ 9 classified as high IC. Frailty was assessed using the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and dichotomized into robustness and frailty (pre-frailty or frailty). Self-rated health was assessed with a four-point item and dichotomized into good or poor. Participants were classified into four groups: robust with high IC, frailty with high IC, robust with low IC, and frailty with low-IC.</p>\n \n <span>AbstractSection</span>\n Results\n <p>Group proportions were: 30.0% (robust with high IC), 23.1% (frailty with high IC), 15.9% (robust with low IC), and 31.0% (frailty with low IC). Multivariable logistic regression showed that only the frailty with low-IC group had significantly greater odds of poor self-rated health compared to the robust with high-IC group (OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.34–9.36).</p>\n \n <span>AbstractSection</span>\n Conclusions\n <p>Co-occurrence of low IC and frailty was significantly associated with poor self-rated health. These findings suggest that considering IC and frailty may enhance understanding of self-rated health in later life.</p>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combinations of intrinsic capacity and frailty and their associations with self-rated health in community-dwelling older adults\",\"authors\":\"Daijo Shiratsuchi,&nbsp;Hyuma Makizako,&nbsp;Shoma Akaida,&nbsp;Yuto Miyake,&nbsp;Ryoji Kiyama,&nbsp;Takayuki Tabira,&nbsp;Mana Tateishi,&nbsp;Rei Otsuka,&nbsp;Toshihiro Takenaka,&nbsp;Takuro Kubozono,&nbsp;Mitsuru Ohishi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <span>AbstractSection</span>\\n Background\\n <p>Intrinsic capacity (IC) and frailty are distinct but complementary frameworks for understanding the heterogeneity of aging. Although both have been linked to self-rated health, little is known about how their combined status relates to older adults’ health perceptions. This cross-sectional study investigated how combinations of IC and frailty status were associated with self-rated health among community-dwelling older adults.</p>\\n \\n <span>AbstractSection</span>\\n Method\\n <p>Data from 593 participants (mean age: 73.9 years, female: 62.2%) in the 2019 Tarumizu Study were analyzed. <i>IC was evaluated across five key screening domains (cognition</i>,<i> vitality</i>,<i> sensory</i>,<i> locomotion</i>,<i> and psychological) using a 10-point scale</i>, with scores ≥ 9 classified as high IC. Frailty was assessed using the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and dichotomized into robustness and frailty (pre-frailty or frailty). Self-rated health was assessed with a four-point item and dichotomized into good or poor. Participants were classified into four groups: robust with high IC, frailty with high IC, robust with low IC, and frailty with low-IC.</p>\\n \\n <span>AbstractSection</span>\\n Results\\n <p>Group proportions were: 30.0% (robust with high IC), 23.1% (frailty with high IC), 15.9% (robust with low IC), and 31.0% (frailty with low IC). Multivariable logistic regression showed that only the frailty with low-IC group had significantly greater odds of poor self-rated health compared to the robust with high-IC group (OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.34–9.36).</p>\\n \\n <span>AbstractSection</span>\\n Conclusions\\n <p>Co-occurrence of low IC and frailty was significantly associated with poor self-rated health. These findings suggest that considering IC and frailty may enhance understanding of self-rated health in later life.</p>\\n \\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03189-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】背景:内在能力(Intrinsic capacity, IC)和脆弱性(vulnerability)是理解老龄化异质性的两个不同但互补的框架。尽管两者都与自我评估的健康状况有关,但人们对它们的综合状况与老年人的健康观念之间的关系知之甚少。这项横断面研究调查了社区居住老年人中IC和虚弱状态的组合如何与自评健康相关。摘要方法对2019年Tarumizu研究中593名参与者(平均年龄73.9岁,女性62.2%)的数据进行分析。IC采用10分制在五个关键筛选领域(认知、活力、感觉、运动和心理)进行评估,得分≥9分为高IC。虚弱采用日本版心血管健康研究标准进行评估,并分为稳健性和脆弱(脆弱前或脆弱)。自我评价的健康状况用一个四点项目进行评估,并分为好或差。参与者被分为四组:高IC的健壮组,高IC的虚弱组,低IC的健壮组和低IC的虚弱组。【摘要】分组比例为:30.0%(强壮伴高IC)、23.1%(虚弱伴高IC)、15.9%(强壮伴低IC)、31.0%(虚弱伴低IC)。多变量logistic回归显示,与高ic组相比,只有低ic组的虚弱者自我评价健康状况不佳的几率显著高于高ic组(OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.34-9.36)。结论低智商和虚弱共存与自我评价健康状况不佳显著相关。这些发现表明,考虑智力障碍和虚弱可能会提高对以后生活中自我评估健康的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combinations of intrinsic capacity and frailty and their associations with self-rated health in community-dwelling older adults
AbstractSection Background

Intrinsic capacity (IC) and frailty are distinct but complementary frameworks for understanding the heterogeneity of aging. Although both have been linked to self-rated health, little is known about how their combined status relates to older adults’ health perceptions. This cross-sectional study investigated how combinations of IC and frailty status were associated with self-rated health among community-dwelling older adults.

AbstractSection Method

Data from 593 participants (mean age: 73.9 years, female: 62.2%) in the 2019 Tarumizu Study were analyzed. IC was evaluated across five key screening domains (cognition, vitality, sensory, locomotion, and psychological) using a 10-point scale, with scores ≥ 9 classified as high IC. Frailty was assessed using the Japanese version of the Cardiovascular Health Study criteria and dichotomized into robustness and frailty (pre-frailty or frailty). Self-rated health was assessed with a four-point item and dichotomized into good or poor. Participants were classified into four groups: robust with high IC, frailty with high IC, robust with low IC, and frailty with low-IC.

AbstractSection Results

Group proportions were: 30.0% (robust with high IC), 23.1% (frailty with high IC), 15.9% (robust with low IC), and 31.0% (frailty with low IC). Multivariable logistic regression showed that only the frailty with low-IC group had significantly greater odds of poor self-rated health compared to the robust with high-IC group (OR = 3.55, 95% CI: 1.34–9.36).

AbstractSection Conclusions

Co-occurrence of low IC and frailty was significantly associated with poor self-rated health. These findings suggest that considering IC and frailty may enhance understanding of self-rated health in later life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信