用激光诱导击穿光谱法测定食品样品中常量营养素(Ca, K和Mg)的校准模型:仪器比较和误差结构信息以提高预测精度

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Dennis Silva Ferreira, Juan Buil-García, Jesús M. Anzano, Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho, Fabiola Manhas Verbi Pereira
{"title":"用激光诱导击穿光谱法测定食品样品中常量营养素(Ca, K和Mg)的校准模型:仪器比较和误差结构信息以提高预测精度","authors":"Dennis Silva Ferreira,&nbsp;Juan Buil-García,&nbsp;Jesús M. Anzano,&nbsp;Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho,&nbsp;Fabiola Manhas Verbi Pereira","doi":"10.1007/s12161-025-02862-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is gaining prominence in analytical chemistry for direct elemental analysis in solid samples, although its sensitivity remains limited, typically ranging from 1000 mg kg⁻<sup>1</sup> to 100%. Error structure utilization can improve accuracy; however, few LIBS studies employ this approach. Data fusion, although promising, is underutilized due to its high cost and low analytical frequency. This study compares calibration models—partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), error covariance penalized regression (ECPR), and maximum likelihood principal component regression (MLPCR)—for analyzing Ca, K, and Mg in non-conventional food plants. Two LIBS instruments, featuring CCD and ICCD detectors, were evaluated individually and through data fusion. ECPR and MLPCR outperformed conventional methods, with ECPR showing superior results. Detection limits ranged from 0.003 g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup> (Mg) to 0.2 g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup> (K), and sensitivity varied between 1.12 and 12.65 (signal area)(g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup>)⁻<sup>1</sup>. Data fusion significantly improves analytical accuracy, and while cost and frequency factors should be evaluated, the benefits often justify its use for high-precision applications.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 10","pages":"2190 - 2197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calibration Models for Macronutrient (Ca, K, and Mg) Determination in Food Samples Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Instruments Comparison and Error Structure Information for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Silva Ferreira,&nbsp;Juan Buil-García,&nbsp;Jesús M. Anzano,&nbsp;Edenir Rodrigues Pereira-Filho,&nbsp;Fabiola Manhas Verbi Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-025-02862-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is gaining prominence in analytical chemistry for direct elemental analysis in solid samples, although its sensitivity remains limited, typically ranging from 1000 mg kg⁻<sup>1</sup> to 100%. Error structure utilization can improve accuracy; however, few LIBS studies employ this approach. Data fusion, although promising, is underutilized due to its high cost and low analytical frequency. This study compares calibration models—partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), error covariance penalized regression (ECPR), and maximum likelihood principal component regression (MLPCR)—for analyzing Ca, K, and Mg in non-conventional food plants. Two LIBS instruments, featuring CCD and ICCD detectors, were evaluated individually and through data fusion. ECPR and MLPCR outperformed conventional methods, with ECPR showing superior results. Detection limits ranged from 0.003 g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup> (Mg) to 0.2 g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup> (K), and sensitivity varied between 1.12 and 12.65 (signal area)(g 100g⁻<sup>1</sup>)⁻<sup>1</sup>. Data fusion significantly improves analytical accuracy, and while cost and frequency factors should be evaluated, the benefits often justify its use for high-precision applications.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 10\",\"pages\":\"2190 - 2197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02862-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02862-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)在固体样品的直接元素分析中越来越突出,尽管它的灵敏度仍然有限,通常范围从1000 mg kg - 1到100%。利用误差结构可以提高精度;然而,很少有LIBS研究采用这种方法。数据融合虽然很有前景,但由于其成本高、分析频率低,尚未得到充分利用。本研究比较了校正模型-偏最小二乘法(PLS)、主成分回归(PCR)、误差协方差惩罚回归(ECPR)和最大似然主成分回归(MLPCR) -用于分析非常规食品植物中的Ca、K和Mg。两个LIBS仪器,具有CCD和ICCD探测器,分别通过数据融合进行评估。ECPR和MLPCR优于传统方法,其中ECPR效果更佳。检测范围从0.003 g 100g毒毒学(Mg)到0.2 g 100g毒毒学(K),灵敏度在1.12到12.65(信号区)(g 100g毒毒学)之间。数据融合显著提高了分析精度,虽然需要评估成本和频率因素,但其优势通常证明其用于高精度应用是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Calibration Models for Macronutrient (Ca, K, and Mg) Determination in Food Samples Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Instruments Comparison and Error Structure Information for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

Calibration Models for Macronutrient (Ca, K, and Mg) Determination in Food Samples Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Instruments Comparison and Error Structure Information for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

Calibration Models for Macronutrient (Ca, K, and Mg) Determination in Food Samples Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy: Instruments Comparison and Error Structure Information for Enhanced Predictive Accuracy

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is gaining prominence in analytical chemistry for direct elemental analysis in solid samples, although its sensitivity remains limited, typically ranging from 1000 mg kg⁻1 to 100%. Error structure utilization can improve accuracy; however, few LIBS studies employ this approach. Data fusion, although promising, is underutilized due to its high cost and low analytical frequency. This study compares calibration models—partial least squares (PLS), principal component regression (PCR), error covariance penalized regression (ECPR), and maximum likelihood principal component regression (MLPCR)—for analyzing Ca, K, and Mg in non-conventional food plants. Two LIBS instruments, featuring CCD and ICCD detectors, were evaluated individually and through data fusion. ECPR and MLPCR outperformed conventional methods, with ECPR showing superior results. Detection limits ranged from 0.003 g 100g⁻1 (Mg) to 0.2 g 100g⁻1 (K), and sensitivity varied between 1.12 and 12.65 (signal area)(g 100g⁻1)⁻1. Data fusion significantly improves analytical accuracy, and while cost and frequency factors should be evaluated, the benefits often justify its use for high-precision applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信