带疏散梯的水下盾构隧道疏散特性全尺寸试验研究

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yaxin Li, Xuepeng Jiang, Qirui Wang, Anzhe Jiang
{"title":"带疏散梯的水下盾构隧道疏散特性全尺寸试验研究","authors":"Yaxin Li,&nbsp;Xuepeng Jiang,&nbsp;Qirui Wang,&nbsp;Anzhe Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s10694-025-01760-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In underwater shield tunnel fire emergencies, the evacuation staircase area is prone to creating a significant bottleneck, severely restricting personnel movement and compromising overall evacuation safety. Accordingly, this paper conducted a full-scale tunnel evacuation experiment involving 186 participants. The results showed that participants exhibited hesitation after disembarking from the vehicle, which led to a circuitous evacuation route, taking up approximately 31.4% of the time during the driveway evacuation phase. Based on the maximum capacity (0.65 person/s) and general capacity (0.56 person/s) obtained from the experiment, a predictive model for the passage time of individuals at the evacuation stairs was proposed to quantify the exit passage time. Participants generally tended to choose the escape exit that appeared first in view or the one that was most physically accessible, and external guidance helped reduce their reliance on inertia when selecting a path. The zoning evacuation strategy of “evacuation exit zoning + evacuation direction limitation” significantly altered the personnel evacuation paths, improved the utilization efficiency of evacuation stairs, and reduced the overall evacuation time by 11.7%. The results of this study provide valuable insights for improving evacuation efficiency and designing escape plans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"61 5","pages":"3875 - 3898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-Scale Experimental Study on Evacuation Behavior of Underwater Shield Tunnel with Evacuation Stairs\",\"authors\":\"Yaxin Li,&nbsp;Xuepeng Jiang,&nbsp;Qirui Wang,&nbsp;Anzhe Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10694-025-01760-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In underwater shield tunnel fire emergencies, the evacuation staircase area is prone to creating a significant bottleneck, severely restricting personnel movement and compromising overall evacuation safety. Accordingly, this paper conducted a full-scale tunnel evacuation experiment involving 186 participants. The results showed that participants exhibited hesitation after disembarking from the vehicle, which led to a circuitous evacuation route, taking up approximately 31.4% of the time during the driveway evacuation phase. Based on the maximum capacity (0.65 person/s) and general capacity (0.56 person/s) obtained from the experiment, a predictive model for the passage time of individuals at the evacuation stairs was proposed to quantify the exit passage time. Participants generally tended to choose the escape exit that appeared first in view or the one that was most physically accessible, and external guidance helped reduce their reliance on inertia when selecting a path. The zoning evacuation strategy of “evacuation exit zoning + evacuation direction limitation” significantly altered the personnel evacuation paths, improved the utilization efficiency of evacuation stairs, and reduced the overall evacuation time by 11.7%. The results of this study provide valuable insights for improving evacuation efficiency and designing escape plans.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Technology\",\"volume\":\"61 5\",\"pages\":\"3875 - 3898\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-025-01760-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-025-01760-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在水下盾构隧道火灾突发事件中,疏散楼梯区域容易形成明显的瓶颈,严重制约人员流动,影响整体疏散安全。据此,本文进行了186人参与的全尺寸隧道疏散实验。结果表明,参与者在下车后表现出犹豫,这导致了迂回的疏散路线,在车道疏散阶段约占31.4%的时间。根据实验得到的最大通行能力(0.65人/s)和一般通行能力(0.56人/s),提出疏散楼梯人员通行时间预测模型,量化疏散楼梯出口通行时间。参与者通常倾向于选择第一个出现在视野中的出口或最容易到达的出口,外部引导有助于减少他们在选择路径时对惯性的依赖。“疏散出口分区+疏散方向限制”的分区疏散策略显著改变了人员疏散路径,提高了疏散楼梯的利用效率,整体疏散时间缩短了11.7%。本研究结果为提高疏散效率和设计逃生计划提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Full-Scale Experimental Study on Evacuation Behavior of Underwater Shield Tunnel with Evacuation Stairs

In underwater shield tunnel fire emergencies, the evacuation staircase area is prone to creating a significant bottleneck, severely restricting personnel movement and compromising overall evacuation safety. Accordingly, this paper conducted a full-scale tunnel evacuation experiment involving 186 participants. The results showed that participants exhibited hesitation after disembarking from the vehicle, which led to a circuitous evacuation route, taking up approximately 31.4% of the time during the driveway evacuation phase. Based on the maximum capacity (0.65 person/s) and general capacity (0.56 person/s) obtained from the experiment, a predictive model for the passage time of individuals at the evacuation stairs was proposed to quantify the exit passage time. Participants generally tended to choose the escape exit that appeared first in view or the one that was most physically accessible, and external guidance helped reduce their reliance on inertia when selecting a path. The zoning evacuation strategy of “evacuation exit zoning + evacuation direction limitation” significantly altered the personnel evacuation paths, improved the utilization efficiency of evacuation stairs, and reduced the overall evacuation time by 11.7%. The results of this study provide valuable insights for improving evacuation efficiency and designing escape plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信