通过机器学习农艺特性,在田间分辨率下获得全土壤剖面的数字土壤制图

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Meyer P. Bohn, Bradley A. Miller
{"title":"通过机器学习农艺特性,在田间分辨率下获得全土壤剖面的数字土壤制图","authors":"Meyer P. Bohn,&nbsp;Bradley A. Miller","doi":"10.1002/agj2.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fine-resolution maps of agronomic soil properties are essential for capturing within-field variability, supporting precision agriculture, improving understanding of soil–crop interactions, and providing reliable inputs for agroecosystem models. This study evaluated the use of digital soil mapping (DSM) with machine learning to predict 18 properties to a depth of 200 cm. Prediction performance peaked at shallow subsurface depths (15–30 cm), where the influence of dynamic anthropogenic disturbances diminished, and the relationship with processes captured by remote sensing remained strong. Total nitrogen, total organic carbon, and calcium showed the highest accuracy for surface depths (&lt;30 cm) with model efficiency coefficient (MEC) of 0.68–0.79, while sand, clay, and K at mid-depths (30–60 cm) exhibited reasonable accuracy (MECs 0.42–0.5). About 17% of models performed worse than the observed mean baseline. Particle size fraction models showed reduced accuracy at the surface, likely due to episodic surficial processes like erosion. However, performance improved in mid-depths and decreased at greater depths due to lithologic discontinuities. While most models’ MEC declined with depth, root mean squared error remained low due to the homogeneity of parent material. This suggests low spatial accuracy may be acceptable if error across all locations is minimal, which is more important for applications that require minimized error propagation (e.g., crop modeling). Covariate importance analysis showed terrain variables remained predictive at greater depths, while surface imagery became less informative. Trend analysis by hillslope position demonstrated DSM's ability to capture site differences, such as the divergence of topographic patterns with different land management practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution\",\"authors\":\"Meyer P. Bohn,&nbsp;Bradley A. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/agj2.70144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fine-resolution maps of agronomic soil properties are essential for capturing within-field variability, supporting precision agriculture, improving understanding of soil–crop interactions, and providing reliable inputs for agroecosystem models. This study evaluated the use of digital soil mapping (DSM) with machine learning to predict 18 properties to a depth of 200 cm. Prediction performance peaked at shallow subsurface depths (15–30 cm), where the influence of dynamic anthropogenic disturbances diminished, and the relationship with processes captured by remote sensing remained strong. Total nitrogen, total organic carbon, and calcium showed the highest accuracy for surface depths (&lt;30 cm) with model efficiency coefficient (MEC) of 0.68–0.79, while sand, clay, and K at mid-depths (30–60 cm) exhibited reasonable accuracy (MECs 0.42–0.5). About 17% of models performed worse than the observed mean baseline. Particle size fraction models showed reduced accuracy at the surface, likely due to episodic surficial processes like erosion. However, performance improved in mid-depths and decreased at greater depths due to lithologic discontinuities. While most models’ MEC declined with depth, root mean squared error remained low due to the homogeneity of parent material. This suggests low spatial accuracy may be acceptable if error across all locations is minimal, which is more important for applications that require minimized error propagation (e.g., crop modeling). Covariate importance analysis showed terrain variables remained predictive at greater depths, while surface imagery became less informative. Trend analysis by hillslope position demonstrated DSM's ability to capture site differences, such as the divergence of topographic patterns with different land management practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"volume\":\"117 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.70144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agronomy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70144\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.70144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

精细分辨率的农用土壤特性图对于捕捉田间变异性、支持精准农业、提高对土壤-作物相互作用的理解以及为农业生态系统模型提供可靠的输入至关重要。本研究评估了数字土壤制图(DSM)与机器学习的使用,以预测深度为200厘米的18个属性。预测效果在浅次地表深度(15-30厘米)达到峰值,在那里动态人为干扰的影响减弱,与遥感捕获的过程的关系仍然很强。总氮、总有机碳和总钙在表层(30 cm)精度最高,模型效率系数(MEC)为0.68 ~ 0.79,而中深层(30 ~ 60 cm)砂、粘土和K精度较好,模型效率系数为0.42 ~ 0.5。大约17%的模型表现比观察到的平均基线差。粒度分数模型在地表显示出较低的准确性,可能是由于侵蚀等偶发性地表过程造成的。然而,由于岩性不连续性,在中深度时性能有所提高,而在更深的深度时性能下降。虽然大多数模型的MEC随深度下降,但由于母材的均匀性,均方根误差仍然很低。这表明,如果所有位置的误差都最小,那么低空间精度可能是可以接受的,这对于需要最小化误差传播的应用(例如,作物建模)更为重要。协变量重要性分析显示,在更深的深度,地形变量仍然具有预测性,而地表图像的信息量变得更少。山坡位置的趋势分析表明,DSM能够捕捉到不同地点的差异,例如不同土地管理做法下地形模式的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution

Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution

Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution

Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution

Digital soil mapping via machine learning of agronomic properties for the full soil profile at within-field resolution

Fine-resolution maps of agronomic soil properties are essential for capturing within-field variability, supporting precision agriculture, improving understanding of soil–crop interactions, and providing reliable inputs for agroecosystem models. This study evaluated the use of digital soil mapping (DSM) with machine learning to predict 18 properties to a depth of 200 cm. Prediction performance peaked at shallow subsurface depths (15–30 cm), where the influence of dynamic anthropogenic disturbances diminished, and the relationship with processes captured by remote sensing remained strong. Total nitrogen, total organic carbon, and calcium showed the highest accuracy for surface depths (<30 cm) with model efficiency coefficient (MEC) of 0.68–0.79, while sand, clay, and K at mid-depths (30–60 cm) exhibited reasonable accuracy (MECs 0.42–0.5). About 17% of models performed worse than the observed mean baseline. Particle size fraction models showed reduced accuracy at the surface, likely due to episodic surficial processes like erosion. However, performance improved in mid-depths and decreased at greater depths due to lithologic discontinuities. While most models’ MEC declined with depth, root mean squared error remained low due to the homogeneity of parent material. This suggests low spatial accuracy may be acceptable if error across all locations is minimal, which is more important for applications that require minimized error propagation (e.g., crop modeling). Covariate importance analysis showed terrain variables remained predictive at greater depths, while surface imagery became less informative. Trend analysis by hillslope position demonstrated DSM's ability to capture site differences, such as the divergence of topographic patterns with different land management practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信