声学探测和占用模型:对未来监测项目的系统回顾

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Frederico Carvalho Martins , Pedro Segurado , João Tiago Marques
{"title":"声学探测和占用模型:对未来监测项目的系统回顾","authors":"Frederico Carvalho Martins ,&nbsp;Pedro Segurado ,&nbsp;João Tiago Marques","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildlife management requires monitoring to infer spatiotemporal changes in the distribution or abundance of species and communities of organisms. Technological advancements have increasingly facilitated monitoring species through new data collection methods. Such technological advancements include small-sized acoustic recording devices that can record a wide range of sound frequencies, making them especially suitable for analysis by statistical tools such as occupancy models. We reviewed 188 publications that used acoustic methods and occupancy modelling published between 2002 and 2024 to synthesise and discuss the past usage and potential of combining these two methodologies in research studies in ecology and conservation. We examined the published articles’ biogeographical focus, taxonomic group, study temporal design, and modelling choices. Additionally, we performed a text network analysis to understand the trends in the investigated topics of the articles. Our findings revealed that most studies were primarily implemented in the Nearctic region (61.7 %) and were concentrated on two taxonomic groups, birds and bats (42 % and 33 %, respectively). We found that nearly half of the studies limited their analysis to the simplest modelling solution, single-season and single-species models, even though many collected data for multiple species and sampled across several seasons. The text analysis revealed that the research primarily focuses on species monitoring and habitat use. Coupling low-cost passive acoustic monitoring with a diversified set of occupancy models is a scalable methodology that can help implement standardised protocols for regional and larger-scale monitoring programs, which are critical for animal conservation in an increasingly anthropogenic landscape.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114081"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic detection and occupancy models: A systematic review with insights for future monitoring programs\",\"authors\":\"Frederico Carvalho Martins ,&nbsp;Pedro Segurado ,&nbsp;João Tiago Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wildlife management requires monitoring to infer spatiotemporal changes in the distribution or abundance of species and communities of organisms. Technological advancements have increasingly facilitated monitoring species through new data collection methods. Such technological advancements include small-sized acoustic recording devices that can record a wide range of sound frequencies, making them especially suitable for analysis by statistical tools such as occupancy models. We reviewed 188 publications that used acoustic methods and occupancy modelling published between 2002 and 2024 to synthesise and discuss the past usage and potential of combining these two methodologies in research studies in ecology and conservation. We examined the published articles’ biogeographical focus, taxonomic group, study temporal design, and modelling choices. Additionally, we performed a text network analysis to understand the trends in the investigated topics of the articles. Our findings revealed that most studies were primarily implemented in the Nearctic region (61.7 %) and were concentrated on two taxonomic groups, birds and bats (42 % and 33 %, respectively). We found that nearly half of the studies limited their analysis to the simplest modelling solution, single-season and single-species models, even though many collected data for multiple species and sampled across several seasons. The text analysis revealed that the research primarily focuses on species monitoring and habitat use. Coupling low-cost passive acoustic monitoring with a diversified set of occupancy models is a scalable methodology that can help implement standardised protocols for regional and larger-scale monitoring programs, which are critical for animal conservation in an increasingly anthropogenic landscape.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010131\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野生动物管理需要监测,以推断物种和生物群落分布或丰度的时空变化。技术进步通过新的数据收集方法日益促进了物种监测。这些技术进步包括可以记录大范围声音频率的小型声学记录设备,使它们特别适合通过占用模型等统计工具进行分析。我们回顾了2002年至2024年间发表的188篇使用声学方法和占用模型的出版物,以综合和讨论这两种方法在生态学和保护研究中的过去使用和结合潜力。我们检查了已发表文章的生物地理焦点、分类类群、研究时间设计和模型选择。此外,我们还进行了文本网络分析,以了解文章调查主题的趋势。结果表明,大多数研究主要集中在新北极地区(61.7%),主要集中在鸟类和蝙蝠两个分类类群上(分别占42%和33%)。我们发现,近一半的研究将他们的分析局限于最简单的建模解决方案,单季节和单物种模型,尽管许多研究收集了多个物种的数据,并在几个季节进行了采样。文本分析表明,研究主要集中在物种监测和生境利用方面。将低成本的被动声监测与多样化的占用模型相结合是一种可扩展的方法,可以帮助实施区域和大规模监测计划的标准化协议,这对日益人为景观中的动物保护至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Acoustic detection and occupancy models: A systematic review with insights for future monitoring programs

Acoustic detection and occupancy models: A systematic review with insights for future monitoring programs
Wildlife management requires monitoring to infer spatiotemporal changes in the distribution or abundance of species and communities of organisms. Technological advancements have increasingly facilitated monitoring species through new data collection methods. Such technological advancements include small-sized acoustic recording devices that can record a wide range of sound frequencies, making them especially suitable for analysis by statistical tools such as occupancy models. We reviewed 188 publications that used acoustic methods and occupancy modelling published between 2002 and 2024 to synthesise and discuss the past usage and potential of combining these two methodologies in research studies in ecology and conservation. We examined the published articles’ biogeographical focus, taxonomic group, study temporal design, and modelling choices. Additionally, we performed a text network analysis to understand the trends in the investigated topics of the articles. Our findings revealed that most studies were primarily implemented in the Nearctic region (61.7 %) and were concentrated on two taxonomic groups, birds and bats (42 % and 33 %, respectively). We found that nearly half of the studies limited their analysis to the simplest modelling solution, single-season and single-species models, even though many collected data for multiple species and sampled across several seasons. The text analysis revealed that the research primarily focuses on species monitoring and habitat use. Coupling low-cost passive acoustic monitoring with a diversified set of occupancy models is a scalable methodology that can help implement standardised protocols for regional and larger-scale monitoring programs, which are critical for animal conservation in an increasingly anthropogenic landscape.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信