Bingchuan Liu , Zhengguang Wang , Fang Zhou , Zhishan Zhang , Guojin Hou , Zhongwei Yang , Yun Tian
{"title":"外伤性胸椎骨折患者肋骨骨折的发生率、危险因素和机器学习预测模型","authors":"Bingchuan Liu , Zhengguang Wang , Fang Zhou , Zhishan Zhang , Guojin Hou , Zhongwei Yang , Yun Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (<em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (<em>P</em> = 0.003), trauma mechanism (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, risk factors, and machine learning prediction models of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures\",\"authors\":\"Bingchuan Liu , Zhengguang Wang , Fang Zhou , Zhishan Zhang , Guojin Hou , Zhongwei Yang , Yun Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (<em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (<em>P</em> = 0.003), trauma mechanism (<em>P</em> < 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (<em>P</em> < 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidence, risk factors, and machine learning prediction models of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures
Objective
This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.
Results
Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (P = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.003), trauma mechanism (P < 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (P < 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.
Conclusions
Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.