外伤性胸椎骨折患者肋骨骨折的发生率、危险因素和机器学习预测模型

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Bingchuan Liu , Zhengguang Wang , Fang Zhou , Zhishan Zhang , Guojin Hou , Zhongwei Yang , Yun Tian
{"title":"外伤性胸椎骨折患者肋骨骨折的发生率、危险因素和机器学习预测模型","authors":"Bingchuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhengguang Wang ,&nbsp;Fang Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhishan Zhang ,&nbsp;Guojin Hou ,&nbsp;Zhongwei Yang ,&nbsp;Yun Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (<em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (<em>P</em> = 0.003), trauma mechanism (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112728"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence, risk factors, and machine learning prediction models of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures\",\"authors\":\"Bingchuan Liu ,&nbsp;Zhengguang Wang ,&nbsp;Fang Zhou ,&nbsp;Zhishan Zhang ,&nbsp;Guojin Hou ,&nbsp;Zhongwei Yang ,&nbsp;Yun Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (<em>P</em> = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (<em>P</em> = 0.003), trauma mechanism (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的全面描述外伤性胸椎骨折(TVFs)患者肋骨骨折的临床特征,并建立预测肋骨骨折风险的机器学习(ML)模型。方法回顾性分析2007年1月至2024年11月在一家医院诊断为TVFs的患者,纳入1420名患者和20个变量。胸部CT扫描用于确认肋骨骨折的存在并检查其分布特征。应用了几种ML模型,包括支持向量机(SVM)、XGBoost、逻辑回归(LR)、决策树(DT)、随机森林(RF)、梯度增强决策树(GBDT)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)、神经网络(NN)和集成学习(EL)。采用曲线下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、F1评分、密度、判别斜率和评分系统等指标评价模型的性能。此外,将ML模型的预测性能与三位经验丰富的临床医生的预测性能进行比较。结果222例(15.6%)患者发生肋骨骨折,共记录1035例肋骨骨折。仅22.5%为单肋骨折,单侧和双侧骨折的分布相似(54.5%比45.5%)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,性别(P = 0.004)、心血管疾病(P = 0.003)、创伤机制(P < 0.001)和胸椎骨折次数(P < 0.001)是肋骨骨折的4个显著预测因素。在所有模型中,EL模型的预测效果最好,准确率为0.920,F1评分为0.767,灵敏度为0.683,特异性为0.977,PPV为0.875,NPV为0.928,总分最高(48分)。值得注意的是,它的表现超过了所有三位临床医生。结论肋骨骨折在tvf患者中较为常见,但可能未被充分诊断,特别是在没有明确症状的情况下。本研究建立的EL模型具有较强的预测能力,可作为一种有价值的临床决策支持工具,用于识别高危患者,降低漏诊的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence, risk factors, and machine learning prediction models of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures

Objective

This study aimed to comprehensively describe the clinical characteristics of rib fractures in patients with traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures (TVFs), and to develop machine learning (ML) models for predicting the risk of rib fractures.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with TVFs at a single hospital between January 2007 and November 2024, enrolling 1420 patients and 20 variables. Chest CT scans were used to confirm the presence of rib fractures and to examine their distribution characteristics. Several ML models, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Naive Bayes (NB), Neural Network (NN), and Ensemble Learning (EL), were applied. Model performance was evaluated using indicators such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, density, discrimination slope, and a scoring system. Additionally, the prediction performance of the ML models was compared with that of three experienced clinicians.

Results

Rib fractures were identified in 222 patients (15.6 %), with a total of 1035 rib fractures recorded. Only 22.5 % were single rib fractures, and the distribution of unilateral and bilateral fractures was comparable (54.5 % vs. 45.5 %). Multivariate logistic regression revealed four significant predictors of rib fractures: gender (P = 0.004), cardiovascular disease (P = 0.003), trauma mechanism (P < 0.001), and the number of thoracic fractures (P < 0.001). Among all models, the EL model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an accuracy of 0.920, F1 score of 0.767, sensitivity of 0.683, specificity of 0.977, PPV of 0.875, NPV of 0.928, and the highest overall score (48). Notably, its performance surpassed that of all three clinicians.

Conclusions

Rib fractures are relatively common in patients with TVFs and may be underdiagnosed, especially in the absence of clear symptoms. The EL model developed in this study offers strong predictive capability and may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool to identify high-risk patients and reduce the likelihood of missed diagnoses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信