Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers
{"title":"道格拉斯冷杉在与三种西部针叶树混合生长时占主导地位","authors":"Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Planting a mixture of species during reforestation is of increasing interest, underlying a need to quantify the long-term effects of mixtures on stand development for a wide array of species. Here we report on ∼40 year response of three dual species mixture trials at a moderate quality site in Washington, USA where coast Douglas-fir (DF, <em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em> var. <em>menziesii</em>) was grown at 3 m spacing in a 50:50 mix with either western hemlock (WH, <em>Tsuga heterophylla</em>), noble fir (NF, <em>Abies procera</em>) or western white pine (WWP, <em>Pinus monticola</em>). Stand metrics were compared for each trial between replicated plots of the mixture and pure monocultures of each component species. Across all trials, DF grown in a mixture had greater height and diameter growth than any of the companion species (in either mixture or monocultures) and also outperformed DF grown in a monoculture. Height to diameter ratios for DF were lower in mixtures for all trials compared to DF monocultures, indicating lower interspecific competition for light when grown in mixture. In the DF-NF and DF-WWP trials, mixtures had lower total volume than the DF monoculture, but higher total volume than the NF and WWP monocultures. In contrast, there were no differences in volume between the mixture and monocultures in the DF-WH trial, likely because of complementary shade tolerances between species; overyielding in the mixture may occur with further stand development. These findings can inform decisions on the utility of species mixtures to achieve various management objectives related to wood production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Douglas-fir dominates when grown in dual species mixtures with three western conifers\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Slesak , Michelle C. Agne , Constance A. Harrington , Matthew D. Powers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Planting a mixture of species during reforestation is of increasing interest, underlying a need to quantify the long-term effects of mixtures on stand development for a wide array of species. Here we report on ∼40 year response of three dual species mixture trials at a moderate quality site in Washington, USA where coast Douglas-fir (DF, <em>Pseudotsuga menziesii</em> var. <em>menziesii</em>) was grown at 3 m spacing in a 50:50 mix with either western hemlock (WH, <em>Tsuga heterophylla</em>), noble fir (NF, <em>Abies procera</em>) or western white pine (WWP, <em>Pinus monticola</em>). Stand metrics were compared for each trial between replicated plots of the mixture and pure monocultures of each component species. Across all trials, DF grown in a mixture had greater height and diameter growth than any of the companion species (in either mixture or monocultures) and also outperformed DF grown in a monoculture. Height to diameter ratios for DF were lower in mixtures for all trials compared to DF monocultures, indicating lower interspecific competition for light when grown in mixture. In the DF-NF and DF-WWP trials, mixtures had lower total volume than the DF monoculture, but higher total volume than the NF and WWP monocultures. In contrast, there were no differences in volume between the mixture and monocultures in the DF-WH trial, likely because of complementary shade tolerances between species; overyielding in the mixture may occur with further stand development. These findings can inform decisions on the utility of species mixtures to achieve various management objectives related to wood production.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"597 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006498\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Douglas-fir dominates when grown in dual species mixtures with three western conifers
Planting a mixture of species during reforestation is of increasing interest, underlying a need to quantify the long-term effects of mixtures on stand development for a wide array of species. Here we report on ∼40 year response of three dual species mixture trials at a moderate quality site in Washington, USA where coast Douglas-fir (DF, Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii) was grown at 3 m spacing in a 50:50 mix with either western hemlock (WH, Tsuga heterophylla), noble fir (NF, Abies procera) or western white pine (WWP, Pinus monticola). Stand metrics were compared for each trial between replicated plots of the mixture and pure monocultures of each component species. Across all trials, DF grown in a mixture had greater height and diameter growth than any of the companion species (in either mixture or monocultures) and also outperformed DF grown in a monoculture. Height to diameter ratios for DF were lower in mixtures for all trials compared to DF monocultures, indicating lower interspecific competition for light when grown in mixture. In the DF-NF and DF-WWP trials, mixtures had lower total volume than the DF monoculture, but higher total volume than the NF and WWP monocultures. In contrast, there were no differences in volume between the mixture and monocultures in the DF-WH trial, likely because of complementary shade tolerances between species; overyielding in the mixture may occur with further stand development. These findings can inform decisions on the utility of species mixtures to achieve various management objectives related to wood production.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.