Wen Nie , Qi Wang , Yipei Zhao , Ruizhi Huang , Shaowei Yang , Xiangfen Cheng , Dexiang Chen , Wenfa Xiao , Jianfeng Liu
{"title":"森林结构对蒙古栎林初级生产力的影响大于气候和土壤控制","authors":"Wen Nie , Qi Wang , Yipei Zhao , Ruizhi Huang , Shaowei Yang , Xiangfen Cheng , Dexiang Chen , Wenfa Xiao , Jianfeng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forest structural attributes such as density, size, and age are important determinants of productivity; however, whether and how this relationship changes across a wide geographic range with varying climate and soil conditions requires validation. <em>Quercus mongolica-</em>dominated forests are widespread in Northern China; however, the spatial characteristics and mechanisms underlying their productivity remain poorly understood. We integrated tree-ring data with field plots from 17 sites and 47 plots spanning approximately 15.5° latitude and 25.0° longitude to evaluate the relative importance of climatic, edaphic, and forest structural factors (forest density, age, and tree size) on the forest productivity. Allometric equations were used to convert diameter growth into estimates of aboveground and belowground net primary productivity (ANPP and BNPP, respectively). Fixed-effect regression and structural equation modeling were used to assess the effects of forest structure and environmental variables on ANPP and BNPP. The sampled forest density ranged from 375 to 1700 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>, age varied from 10 to 197 years, and diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 5.0 to 63.3 cm. ANPP ranged from 2.1 to 7.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas BNPP ranged from 0.2 to 2.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Forest density and maximum DBH emerged as the strongest positive predictors of ANPP and BNPP, whereas age was a significant negative predictor. The structural equation model showed that climatic and soil variables only indirectly affected BNPP through their effects on forest structure. This study highlights the need to consider forest age, in addition to density and tree size, to estimate primary productivity across a wide geographic range.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":"597 ","pages":"Article 123137"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest structure outweighs climatic and edaphic controls of primary productivity in Quercus mongolica forests in Northern China\",\"authors\":\"Wen Nie , Qi Wang , Yipei Zhao , Ruizhi Huang , Shaowei Yang , Xiangfen Cheng , Dexiang Chen , Wenfa Xiao , Jianfeng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Forest structural attributes such as density, size, and age are important determinants of productivity; however, whether and how this relationship changes across a wide geographic range with varying climate and soil conditions requires validation. <em>Quercus mongolica-</em>dominated forests are widespread in Northern China; however, the spatial characteristics and mechanisms underlying their productivity remain poorly understood. We integrated tree-ring data with field plots from 17 sites and 47 plots spanning approximately 15.5° latitude and 25.0° longitude to evaluate the relative importance of climatic, edaphic, and forest structural factors (forest density, age, and tree size) on the forest productivity. Allometric equations were used to convert diameter growth into estimates of aboveground and belowground net primary productivity (ANPP and BNPP, respectively). Fixed-effect regression and structural equation modeling were used to assess the effects of forest structure and environmental variables on ANPP and BNPP. The sampled forest density ranged from 375 to 1700 trees ha<sup>−1</sup>, age varied from 10 to 197 years, and diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 5.0 to 63.3 cm. ANPP ranged from 2.1 to 7.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, whereas BNPP ranged from 0.2 to 2.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Forest density and maximum DBH emerged as the strongest positive predictors of ANPP and BNPP, whereas age was a significant negative predictor. The structural equation model showed that climatic and soil variables only indirectly affected BNPP through their effects on forest structure. This study highlights the need to consider forest age, in addition to density and tree size, to estimate primary productivity across a wide geographic range.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":\"597 \",\"pages\":\"Article 123137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006450\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112725006450","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
森林结构属性,如密度、大小和年龄是生产力的重要决定因素;然而,这种关系是否以及如何在不同的气候和土壤条件下在广泛的地理范围内发生变化需要验证。蒙古栎林在中国北方分布广泛;然而,人们对其生产力的空间特征和机制仍然知之甚少。我们将17个样地和47个样地的年轮数据与大约15.5°纬度和25.0°经度的样地相结合,评估了气候、土壤和森林结构因子(森林密度、年龄和树木大小)对森林生产力的相对重要性。利用异速生长方程将直径增长转化为地上和地下净初级生产力(分别为ANPP和BNPP)的估算值。采用固定效应回归和结构方程模型评估了森林结构和环境变量对ANPP和BNPP的影响。样林密度为375 ~ 1700株ha−1,树龄为10 ~ 197年,胸径为5.0 ~ 63.3 cm。ANPP的变化范围为2.1 ~ 7.4 t ha−1 year−1,而BNPP的变化范围为0.2 ~ 2.4 t ha−1 year−1。森林密度和最大胸径是ANPP和BNPP最显著的正预测因子,而年龄是显著的负预测因子。结构方程模型表明,气候和土壤变量仅通过对森林结构的影响间接影响BNPP。这项研究强调,除了密度和树木大小外,还需要考虑森林年龄,以估计广泛地理范围内的初级生产力。
Forest structure outweighs climatic and edaphic controls of primary productivity in Quercus mongolica forests in Northern China
Forest structural attributes such as density, size, and age are important determinants of productivity; however, whether and how this relationship changes across a wide geographic range with varying climate and soil conditions requires validation. Quercus mongolica-dominated forests are widespread in Northern China; however, the spatial characteristics and mechanisms underlying their productivity remain poorly understood. We integrated tree-ring data with field plots from 17 sites and 47 plots spanning approximately 15.5° latitude and 25.0° longitude to evaluate the relative importance of climatic, edaphic, and forest structural factors (forest density, age, and tree size) on the forest productivity. Allometric equations were used to convert diameter growth into estimates of aboveground and belowground net primary productivity (ANPP and BNPP, respectively). Fixed-effect regression and structural equation modeling were used to assess the effects of forest structure and environmental variables on ANPP and BNPP. The sampled forest density ranged from 375 to 1700 trees ha−1, age varied from 10 to 197 years, and diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 5.0 to 63.3 cm. ANPP ranged from 2.1 to 7.4 t ha−1 yr−1, whereas BNPP ranged from 0.2 to 2.4 t ha−1 yr−1. Forest density and maximum DBH emerged as the strongest positive predictors of ANPP and BNPP, whereas age was a significant negative predictor. The structural equation model showed that climatic and soil variables only indirectly affected BNPP through their effects on forest structure. This study highlights the need to consider forest age, in addition to density and tree size, to estimate primary productivity across a wide geographic range.
期刊介绍:
Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world.
A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers.
We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include:
1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests;
2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management;
3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023);
4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript.
The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.