平衡放牧和生物多样性:节肢动物对现代畜牧业的反应

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sanna Mäkeläinen , Torgny Backman , Laura Bosco , Andrea Santangeli , Aleksi Lehikoinen , Venla Saaristo , Johan Ekroos , Helena Wirta , Iryna Herzon
{"title":"平衡放牧和生物多样性:节肢动物对现代畜牧业的反应","authors":"Sanna Mäkeläinen ,&nbsp;Torgny Backman ,&nbsp;Laura Bosco ,&nbsp;Andrea Santangeli ,&nbsp;Aleksi Lehikoinen ,&nbsp;Venla Saaristo ,&nbsp;Johan Ekroos ,&nbsp;Helena Wirta ,&nbsp;Iryna Herzon","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ruminant production exerts severe pressure on ecosystems through land use change for pasture and fodder production, contributing to biodiversity loss, disruption of natural biogeochemical fluxes, and climate change. Whereas ruminant production can support biodiversity that has co-evolved with grasslands and grazing animals, the values of temporary grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the effects of grazing regimes practised on modern cattle farms, including no grazing, on the abundance, biomass, and taxonomic richness of aerial and ground-dwelling arthropods. We assessed the potential value of organic management compared to grazing on conventional farms, and the role of vegetation structure on the pastures. We sampled arthropods in temporary pastures and silage grasslands, spring cereal fields, and in farmyards on 43 dairy and suckler cow farms in Finland. We show that grazing benefits the richness of ground-dwelling arthropods in fields, and the benefits were most evident at extensive levels of grazing at the farm scale. Grazing had no significant benefits for the biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods or relative abundance of aerial arthropods over field vegetation. Grazed rotational grasslands had similar levels of arthropods as mown grasslands or cereal crops, except for a higher richness of ground-dwelling arthropods. Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional, but only at low grazing intensities. Although our study suggests several ways in which livestock farmers can maintain and increase arthropod populations on their farms, these may be associated with some reduction in production output on modern farms oriented towards high yields.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"395 ","pages":"Article 109942"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing grazing and biodiversity: Arthropod responses to modern cattle farming practices\",\"authors\":\"Sanna Mäkeläinen ,&nbsp;Torgny Backman ,&nbsp;Laura Bosco ,&nbsp;Andrea Santangeli ,&nbsp;Aleksi Lehikoinen ,&nbsp;Venla Saaristo ,&nbsp;Johan Ekroos ,&nbsp;Helena Wirta ,&nbsp;Iryna Herzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2025.109942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ruminant production exerts severe pressure on ecosystems through land use change for pasture and fodder production, contributing to biodiversity loss, disruption of natural biogeochemical fluxes, and climate change. Whereas ruminant production can support biodiversity that has co-evolved with grasslands and grazing animals, the values of temporary grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the effects of grazing regimes practised on modern cattle farms, including no grazing, on the abundance, biomass, and taxonomic richness of aerial and ground-dwelling arthropods. We assessed the potential value of organic management compared to grazing on conventional farms, and the role of vegetation structure on the pastures. We sampled arthropods in temporary pastures and silage grasslands, spring cereal fields, and in farmyards on 43 dairy and suckler cow farms in Finland. We show that grazing benefits the richness of ground-dwelling arthropods in fields, and the benefits were most evident at extensive levels of grazing at the farm scale. Grazing had no significant benefits for the biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods or relative abundance of aerial arthropods over field vegetation. Grazed rotational grasslands had similar levels of arthropods as mown grasslands or cereal crops, except for a higher richness of ground-dwelling arthropods. Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional, but only at low grazing intensities. Although our study suggests several ways in which livestock farmers can maintain and increase arthropod populations on their farms, these may be associated with some reduction in production output on modern farms oriented towards high yields.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"395 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004748\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880925004748","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反刍动物生产通过改变牧场和饲料生产的土地利用方式,对生态系统造成严重压力,导致生物多样性丧失、自然生物地球化学通量中断和气候变化。尽管反刍动物生产可以支持与草原和放牧动物共同进化的生物多样性,但人们对临时草原的价值知之甚少。在本研究中,我们评估了现代养牛场放牧制度(包括不放牧)对空中和地面节肢动物丰度、生物量和分类丰富度的影响。与传统牧场放牧相比,我们评估了有机管理的潜在价值,以及植被结构对牧场的作用。我们在芬兰的临时牧场和青贮草地、春粮田以及43个奶牛场和乳牛场的农场中取样节肢动物。研究表明,放牧有利于田间地栖节肢动物的丰富度,并且在农场规模的广泛放牧水平上,这种好处最为明显。放牧对地栖节肢动物生物量和空中节肢动物相对丰度的影响不显著。轮牧草地的节肢动物数量与刈割草地或谷类作物的节肢动物数量相似,但地上生活节肢动物的丰富度更高。土壤节肢动物的分类丰富度在有机农场高于常规农场,但仅在低放牧强度下。尽管我们的研究提出了几种牲畜养殖户可以维持和增加农场节肢动物种群的方法,但这些方法可能会导致以高产为导向的现代农场的产量有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Balancing grazing and biodiversity: Arthropod responses to modern cattle farming practices
Ruminant production exerts severe pressure on ecosystems through land use change for pasture and fodder production, contributing to biodiversity loss, disruption of natural biogeochemical fluxes, and climate change. Whereas ruminant production can support biodiversity that has co-evolved with grasslands and grazing animals, the values of temporary grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, we assessed the effects of grazing regimes practised on modern cattle farms, including no grazing, on the abundance, biomass, and taxonomic richness of aerial and ground-dwelling arthropods. We assessed the potential value of organic management compared to grazing on conventional farms, and the role of vegetation structure on the pastures. We sampled arthropods in temporary pastures and silage grasslands, spring cereal fields, and in farmyards on 43 dairy and suckler cow farms in Finland. We show that grazing benefits the richness of ground-dwelling arthropods in fields, and the benefits were most evident at extensive levels of grazing at the farm scale. Grazing had no significant benefits for the biomass of ground-dwelling arthropods or relative abundance of aerial arthropods over field vegetation. Grazed rotational grasslands had similar levels of arthropods as mown grasslands or cereal crops, except for a higher richness of ground-dwelling arthropods. Taxonomic richness of ground-dwelling arthropods was higher on organic farms than conventional, but only at low grazing intensities. Although our study suggests several ways in which livestock farmers can maintain and increase arthropod populations on their farms, these may be associated with some reduction in production output on modern farms oriented towards high yields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信