哪些变量可以预测成年后的主观幸福感?

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Albert Sesé , Igor Esnaola , Pablo Fernández-Berrocal , Patxi Léon-Guereño , Lorea Azpiazu
{"title":"哪些变量可以预测成年后的主观幸福感?","authors":"Albert Sesé ,&nbsp;Igor Esnaola ,&nbsp;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal ,&nbsp;Patxi Léon-Guereño ,&nbsp;Lorea Azpiazu","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between cultural dimensions, emotional intelligence (EI), resilience and subjective well-being. The sample was composed of 3419 participants. Two models were compared and the standardized estimated parameters and gender invariance were analyzed. Overall speaking, results indicated that: (1) The cultural dimension long-term orientation demonstrated the strongest relationship on EI dimensions; likewise, power distance and collectivisms positively predicted emotional repair; and power distance negatively predicted emotional attention; (2) Resilience was negatively predicted by uncertainty avoidance, while collectivism and long-term orientation emerged as positive predictors; (3) All three dimensions of EI predicted resilience; (4) Emotional attention emerged as a predictor of negative affect and life satisfaction, while emotional clarity and repair demonstrated predictive capacity for both positive and negative affect; (5) None of the indirect effects from EI dimensions to life satisfaction through resilience were statistically significant; (6) Individuals with high resilience tend to experience enhanced positive affect and life satisfaction, concomitant with diminished negative affect; (5) Individuals experiencing more positive affects report higher life satisfaction, whereas those experiencing more negative affects report lower life satisfaction; and (6) the structural relationships between EI, resilience, affect, and life satisfaction operate similarly for both genders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What variables predict subjective well-being in adulthood?\",\"authors\":\"Albert Sesé ,&nbsp;Igor Esnaola ,&nbsp;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal ,&nbsp;Patxi Léon-Guereño ,&nbsp;Lorea Azpiazu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the relationship between cultural dimensions, emotional intelligence (EI), resilience and subjective well-being. The sample was composed of 3419 participants. Two models were compared and the standardized estimated parameters and gender invariance were analyzed. Overall speaking, results indicated that: (1) The cultural dimension long-term orientation demonstrated the strongest relationship on EI dimensions; likewise, power distance and collectivisms positively predicted emotional repair; and power distance negatively predicted emotional attention; (2) Resilience was negatively predicted by uncertainty avoidance, while collectivism and long-term orientation emerged as positive predictors; (3) All three dimensions of EI predicted resilience; (4) Emotional attention emerged as a predictor of negative affect and life satisfaction, while emotional clarity and repair demonstrated predictive capacity for both positive and negative affect; (5) None of the indirect effects from EI dimensions to life satisfaction through resilience were statistically significant; (6) Individuals with high resilience tend to experience enhanced positive affect and life satisfaction, concomitant with diminished negative affect; (5) Individuals experiencing more positive affects report higher life satisfaction, whereas those experiencing more negative affects report lower life satisfaction; and (6) the structural relationships between EI, resilience, affect, and life satisfaction operate similarly for both genders.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925004015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了文化维度、情绪智力、心理弹性和主观幸福感之间的关系。样本由3419名参与者组成。比较了两种模型,分析了标准化估计参数和性别不变性。总体而言,研究结果表明:(1)文化维度长期取向对EI维度的影响最大;同样,权力距离和集体主义正向预测情绪修复;权力距离负向预测情绪注意;(2)不确定性回避对心理韧性有负向预测作用,集体主义和长期取向对心理韧性有正向预测作用;(3)情商的三个维度均能预测心理弹性;(4)情绪注意是负面影响和生活满意度的预测因子,而情绪清晰度和情绪修复对积极和消极影响均具有预测能力;(5) EI维度通过心理弹性对生活满意度的间接影响均不显著;(6)高弹性个体的积极情感和生活满意度倾向于增强,消极情感倾向于减弱;(5)积极影响越多的个体生活满意度越高,消极影响越多的个体生活满意度越低;(6)情商、心理弹性、情感和生活满意度之间的结构关系在两性中相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What variables predict subjective well-being in adulthood?
This study examines the relationship between cultural dimensions, emotional intelligence (EI), resilience and subjective well-being. The sample was composed of 3419 participants. Two models were compared and the standardized estimated parameters and gender invariance were analyzed. Overall speaking, results indicated that: (1) The cultural dimension long-term orientation demonstrated the strongest relationship on EI dimensions; likewise, power distance and collectivisms positively predicted emotional repair; and power distance negatively predicted emotional attention; (2) Resilience was negatively predicted by uncertainty avoidance, while collectivism and long-term orientation emerged as positive predictors; (3) All three dimensions of EI predicted resilience; (4) Emotional attention emerged as a predictor of negative affect and life satisfaction, while emotional clarity and repair demonstrated predictive capacity for both positive and negative affect; (5) None of the indirect effects from EI dimensions to life satisfaction through resilience were statistically significant; (6) Individuals with high resilience tend to experience enhanced positive affect and life satisfaction, concomitant with diminished negative affect; (5) Individuals experiencing more positive affects report higher life satisfaction, whereas those experiencing more negative affects report lower life satisfaction; and (6) the structural relationships between EI, resilience, affect, and life satisfaction operate similarly for both genders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信