Matthew J. Beck, Michiel C.J. Bliemer, James Bushell
{"title":"准备好道路收费改革了吗?识别澳大利亚的支持阶层,揭示(隐藏的)态度","authors":"Matthew J. Beck, Michiel C.J. Bliemer, James Bushell","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of research and broad consensus in the academic literature regarding its efficiency, road pricing reform remains a controversial topic that many policymakers are loath to debate, and the public strongly resists. Nevertheless, as traditional sources of road funding decline and the costs of maintaining road infrastructure continue to rise, some form of reform will be necessary. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper revisits the foundations of the debate and presents an in-depth analysis of public attitudes towards the need for road funding reform, specifically examining the acceptability of a simple road user charge (cents per kilometre), independent of specific pricing levels or policy design features. We segment respondents into five distinct clusters based on their underlying support for, or resistance to, reform, and further contextualise these segments by exploring their perceptions of a road user charge. Overall, we identify that the time to discuss reform is now, as there is growing recognition that funding change will be required. We provide recommendations on how to navigate these initial discussions, particularly as our analysis reveals potentially hidden ulterior motivations that may ultimately shape how reform proposals are received and, in turn, their viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"200 ","pages":"Article 104646"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ready for road pricing reform? Identifying segments of support in Australia and uncovering (Hidden) attitudes\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J. Beck, Michiel C.J. Bliemer, James Bushell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite decades of research and broad consensus in the academic literature regarding its efficiency, road pricing reform remains a controversial topic that many policymakers are loath to debate, and the public strongly resists. Nevertheless, as traditional sources of road funding decline and the costs of maintaining road infrastructure continue to rise, some form of reform will be necessary. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper revisits the foundations of the debate and presents an in-depth analysis of public attitudes towards the need for road funding reform, specifically examining the acceptability of a simple road user charge (cents per kilometre), independent of specific pricing levels or policy design features. We segment respondents into five distinct clusters based on their underlying support for, or resistance to, reform, and further contextualise these segments by exploring their perceptions of a road user charge. Overall, we identify that the time to discuss reform is now, as there is growing recognition that funding change will be required. We provide recommendations on how to navigate these initial discussions, particularly as our analysis reveals potentially hidden ulterior motivations that may ultimately shape how reform proposals are received and, in turn, their viability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"200 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002745\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002745","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ready for road pricing reform? Identifying segments of support in Australia and uncovering (Hidden) attitudes
Despite decades of research and broad consensus in the academic literature regarding its efficiency, road pricing reform remains a controversial topic that many policymakers are loath to debate, and the public strongly resists. Nevertheless, as traditional sources of road funding decline and the costs of maintaining road infrastructure continue to rise, some form of reform will be necessary. Using a mixed-methods approach, this paper revisits the foundations of the debate and presents an in-depth analysis of public attitudes towards the need for road funding reform, specifically examining the acceptability of a simple road user charge (cents per kilometre), independent of specific pricing levels or policy design features. We segment respondents into five distinct clusters based on their underlying support for, or resistance to, reform, and further contextualise these segments by exploring their perceptions of a road user charge. Overall, we identify that the time to discuss reform is now, as there is growing recognition that funding change will be required. We provide recommendations on how to navigate these initial discussions, particularly as our analysis reveals potentially hidden ulterior motivations that may ultimately shape how reform proposals are received and, in turn, their viability.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.