英国城市发展中的健康考虑:干预措施的系统映射见解

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Pablo Newberry , Neil Carhart
{"title":"英国城市发展中的健康考虑:干预措施的系统映射见解","authors":"Pablo Newberry ,&nbsp;Neil Carhart","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article maps and explores the system influencing the consideration of health in UK urban development decision-making based on interviews with 132 decision-makers in public, private and third sector roles. It implements a novel approach to construct and aggregate multiple causal loop diagrams to synthesise the perspectives of different stakeholder groups in a single model. It illustrates how seven interventions targeting different parts of the system can influence feedback loops to drive change. Focusing on sub-models, the findings suggest that intervening to (1) change mindsets and (2) influence real estate investment practices of the private sector can shape pro-health attitudes, pro-health funding, and health-informed decisions, and (3) embedding a health valuation tool in national government can generate political support for health in policies, joined-up thinking and collective responsibility for health. Utilising health data in (4) transport strategies and (5) spatial planning, as well as (6) providing legal training, and (7) integrating lived experience in community engagement at a local and city-region level can enhance quantitative and qualitative health data in policies and decision-making while providing the capacity to legally defend those decisions. Overall, the causal loop diagram indicates that the interventions can reinforce the consideration of health in urban development decision-making without many factors resisting change. However, if health measures in urban development are perceived to limit profits rather than realise environmental, social and governance (ESG) value, then this acts as a balancing mechanism. The model can inform a systems-level evaluation by indicating the ripple effects and cumulative impact of interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 106403"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health consideration in UK urban development: Systems mapping insights for interventions\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Newberry ,&nbsp;Neil Carhart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article maps and explores the system influencing the consideration of health in UK urban development decision-making based on interviews with 132 decision-makers in public, private and third sector roles. It implements a novel approach to construct and aggregate multiple causal loop diagrams to synthesise the perspectives of different stakeholder groups in a single model. It illustrates how seven interventions targeting different parts of the system can influence feedback loops to drive change. Focusing on sub-models, the findings suggest that intervening to (1) change mindsets and (2) influence real estate investment practices of the private sector can shape pro-health attitudes, pro-health funding, and health-informed decisions, and (3) embedding a health valuation tool in national government can generate political support for health in policies, joined-up thinking and collective responsibility for health. Utilising health data in (4) transport strategies and (5) spatial planning, as well as (6) providing legal training, and (7) integrating lived experience in community engagement at a local and city-region level can enhance quantitative and qualitative health data in policies and decision-making while providing the capacity to legally defend those decisions. Overall, the causal loop diagram indicates that the interventions can reinforce the consideration of health in urban development decision-making without many factors resisting change. However, if health measures in urban development are perceived to limit profits rather than realise environmental, social and governance (ESG) value, then this acts as a balancing mechanism. The model can inform a systems-level evaluation by indicating the ripple effects and cumulative impact of interventions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125007048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125007048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过对132名公共、私营和第三部门决策者的访谈,绘制并探讨了影响英国城市发展决策中健康考虑的系统。它实现了一种新的方法来构建和聚合多个因果循环图,以在单个模型中综合不同利益相关者群体的观点。它说明了针对系统不同部分的七种干预措施如何影响反馈循环以推动变革。重点关注子模型,研究结果表明,通过干预(1)改变观念,(2)影响私营部门的房地产投资实践,可以塑造有利于健康的态度、有利于健康的资金和健康知情的决策;(3)在国家政府中嵌入健康评估工具,可以在政策、联合思维和集体健康责任方面产生对健康的政治支持。在(4)运输战略和(5)空间规划中利用卫生数据,以及(6)提供法律培训,(7)在地方和城市区域一级的社区参与中整合生活经验,可以加强政策和决策中的定量和定性卫生数据,同时提供从法律上为这些决策辩护的能力。总体而言,因果循环图表明,干预措施可以加强对城市发展决策中健康的考虑,而没有许多因素抵制变化。然而,如果城市发展中的健康措施被认为是限制利润,而不是实现环境、社会和治理(ESG)价值,那么这就成为一种平衡机制。该模型可以通过指出干预措施的连锁反应和累积影响,为系统级评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health consideration in UK urban development: Systems mapping insights for interventions
This article maps and explores the system influencing the consideration of health in UK urban development decision-making based on interviews with 132 decision-makers in public, private and third sector roles. It implements a novel approach to construct and aggregate multiple causal loop diagrams to synthesise the perspectives of different stakeholder groups in a single model. It illustrates how seven interventions targeting different parts of the system can influence feedback loops to drive change. Focusing on sub-models, the findings suggest that intervening to (1) change mindsets and (2) influence real estate investment practices of the private sector can shape pro-health attitudes, pro-health funding, and health-informed decisions, and (3) embedding a health valuation tool in national government can generate political support for health in policies, joined-up thinking and collective responsibility for health. Utilising health data in (4) transport strategies and (5) spatial planning, as well as (6) providing legal training, and (7) integrating lived experience in community engagement at a local and city-region level can enhance quantitative and qualitative health data in policies and decision-making while providing the capacity to legally defend those decisions. Overall, the causal loop diagram indicates that the interventions can reinforce the consideration of health in urban development decision-making without many factors resisting change. However, if health measures in urban development are perceived to limit profits rather than realise environmental, social and governance (ESG) value, then this acts as a balancing mechanism. The model can inform a systems-level evaluation by indicating the ripple effects and cumulative impact of interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信