公众认知如何影响邻避冲突中的抵抗?-对中国25例病例进行定性比较分析

IF 6.6 1区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Xu Geng , Huayun Liu , Lina Zhang , Honghao Li , Yang Fu
{"title":"公众认知如何影响邻避冲突中的抵抗?-对中国25例病例进行定性比较分析","authors":"Xu Geng ,&nbsp;Huayun Liu ,&nbsp;Lina Zhang ,&nbsp;Honghao Li ,&nbsp;Yang Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 106398"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does public perception influence resistance in NIMBY conflicts? — A qualitative comparative analysis of 25 cases in China\",\"authors\":\"Xu Geng ,&nbsp;Huayun Liu ,&nbsp;Lina Zhang ,&nbsp;Honghao Li ,&nbsp;Yang Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006997\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改革开放以来,随着城市化和社会经济的快速发展,公共设施的建设在提高居民生活质量的同时,也引发了一系列邻避冲突。虽然邻避运动经常为居民提供表达他们关切的重要机会,但本研究特别考察了这些运动升级为严重对抗的条件。本研究通过对中国25个邻避冲突案例的定性比较分析(QCA),确定了高危害认知、政府反应无效和对政府的低信任是产生强烈抵抗行为的必要条件。进一步划分了导致冲突加剧的三种不同途径:(1)利益冲突与信任侵蚀;(2)利益冲突与环境关注;(3)信任崩溃与环境破坏。这些途径突出了冲突升级的互动性和配置性。研究结果提供了实证见解,可以帮助决策者有效地管理公众看法,促进建设性的治理对策,从而降低严重邻避对抗的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How does public perception influence resistance in NIMBY conflicts? — A qualitative comparative analysis of 25 cases in China
With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cities
Cities URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.00%
发文量
517
期刊介绍: Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信