Xu Geng , Huayun Liu , Lina Zhang , Honghao Li , Yang Fu
{"title":"公众认知如何影响邻避冲突中的抵抗?-对中国25例病例进行定性比较分析","authors":"Xu Geng , Huayun Liu , Lina Zhang , Honghao Li , Yang Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 106398"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How does public perception influence resistance in NIMBY conflicts? — A qualitative comparative analysis of 25 cases in China\",\"authors\":\"Xu Geng , Huayun Liu , Lina Zhang , Honghao Li , Yang Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cities\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006997\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125006997","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
How does public perception influence resistance in NIMBY conflicts? — A qualitative comparative analysis of 25 cases in China
With rapid urbanization and socio-economic development since China's reform and opening up, the construction of public facilities has improved residents' quality of life but also triggered a series of NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) conflicts. Although NIMBY movements often provide vital opportunities for residents to voice their concerns, this research specifically examines conditions under which these movements escalate into severe confrontations. Drawing on qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 25 NIMBY conflict cases in China, the study identifies high hazard perception, ineffective governmental responses, and low trust in government as necessary conditions for generating strong resistance behaviors. Three distinct pathways leading to intensified conflicts are further delineated: (1) Conflict of Interests and Trust Erosion, (2) Conflict of Interests and Environmental Concerns, and (3) Trust Breakdown and Environmental Disruption. These pathways highlight the interactive and configurational nature of conflict escalation. The findings offer empirical insights that can help policymakers effectively manage public perceptions and facilitate constructive governance responses, thereby reducing the risk of severe NIMBY confrontations.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.